Medicare: Mend It, Don’t End It
The gut reaction by many on the left is to protect Medicare from negotiations on the deficit and debt ceiling. The problem is that Medicare is in trouble in the near future and will require some changes. This is not because it is a ponzi scheme, as described by Governor Perry, but rather because of the demographic changes in U.S. society and because of the rising cost of medical care. One of the best progressive arguments for changes to Medicare was written by DemFromCT (read the whole piece)
The bottom line is that there will have to be adjustments made to Medicare (and easier, but necessary, adjustments made to Social Security.) That’s simply not debatable. Therefore, the political question isn’t why Medicare and Social Security are on the table, it’s whom do we trust to do it in a way that preserves the programs and protects the elderly?
This frames the choice in 2012 much more clearly. Assuming the dysfunctional House GOP prevents a Medicare solution in 2011-2012, do we want a president dedicated to preserving Social Security and Medicare or one who calls them a ponzi scheme?
Click here for reuse options!Copyright 2011 Liberaland
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.