NY Times after meeting: ‘Alarming’ how ‘thinly thought-out’ his positions are

Posted by | November 23, 2016 17:11 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics

Some things were “good to hear,” but they were flip-flops from positions he had ten minutes earlier.

The New York Times editorial board posted an editorial last night reacting to their big meeting with Donald Trump, and while they listed some things that were “good to hear,” there were also certain “alarming” things that they’re concerned about.

They expressed encouragement over how he disavowed the white nationalists supporting him and how he moderated on climate change, writing, “If President-elect Trump moderates his views, and then crystallizes those views in policies that, as he put it, ‘save our country,’ we will commend him on growth in office.”

However, they still have serious concerns about his policies. Specifically, his unclear stances on some of them:

It was alarming to confront how thinly thought through many of the president-elect’s stances actually are. Consider climate change. Mr. Trump said that he valued clean air and water, but that he hadn’t decided if combating climate change was worth the expense. “I have a totally open mind,” he said, making a virtue of not knowing the issue…

We would applaud any sensible change of position, however arrived at. Mr. Trump’s apparent flexibility, combined with his lack of depth on policy, might be grounds to hope he will steer a wiser course than the one plotted by his campaign. But so far he is surrounding himself with officials eager to enact only the most extreme positions. His flexibility would be their springboard.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

10 responses to NY Times after meeting: ‘Alarming’ how ‘thinly thought-out’ his positions are

  1. amersham1046 November 23rd, 2016 at 18:23

    What does one expect from a new ‘part-time ‘ president

  2. Warman1138 November 23rd, 2016 at 18:44

    And the NY Times just figured this out when?

    • Suzanne McFly November 23rd, 2016 at 19:04

      Exactly, why wasn’t this story published last year?

      • Warman1138 November 23rd, 2016 at 19:39

        And TV news enabled him with coverage and ”e-mailed” HC for eternity.

        • Suzanne McFly November 23rd, 2016 at 21:33

          Kind of pathetic in multiple ways.

    • Obewon November 24th, 2016 at 00:39

      The Times was just tipped off by Donnies crack new HUD Secretary Ben Carson.

  3. Duke Woolworth November 23rd, 2016 at 19:47

    Some day they’ll discover that Trump’s basically a lazy, spoiled brat; has been forever. They’ve covered him for decades and haven’t tumbled to his laziness. Dumb.

  4. oldfart November 24th, 2016 at 01:16

    Oh c’mon…It’s gonna be great !!!
    He said so… :[

    • Pietro Psalm November 24th, 2016 at 06:16

      Now you said something funny as hell.

  5. William November 24th, 2016 at 01:24

    Watching Cheeto-Hitler break the hearts of the Goobers is kinda fun. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c44c722cc3b22b040bd284d1a23275aa7a4173af78cbcb93e5a4fd7df1b3c269.jpg

Leave a Reply