A first for Wired: a presidential endorsement
The Vanity Fair of tech goes editorially where it has not gone before:
… for all of its opinions and enthusiasms, WIRED has never made a practice of endorsing candidates for president of the United States. Through five election cycles we’ve written about politics and politicians and held them up against our ideals. But we’ve avoided telling you, our readers, who WIRED viewed as the best choice.
Today we will. WIRED sees only one person running for president who can do the job: Hillary Clinton.
Right now we see two possible futures welling up in the present. In one, society’s every decision is dominated by scarcity. Except for a few oligarchs, nobody has enough of anything. In that future, we build literal and figurative walls to keep out those who hope to acquire our stuff, while through guile or violence we try to acquire theirs.
In the other future, the one WIRED is rooting for, new rounds of innovation allow people to do more with less work—in a way that translates into abundance, broadly enjoyed. Governments and markets and entrepreneurs create the conditions that allow us to take effective collective action against climate change. The flashlight beam of science keeps turning up cool stuff in the corners of the universe. The grand social experiments of the 20th and early 21st centuries—the mass entry of women into the workforce, civil rights, LGBTQ rights—continue and give way to new ones that are just as necessary and unsettling and empowering to people who got left out of previous rounds. And the sustainably manufactured, genetically modified fake meat tastes really good too.
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
4 responses to A first for Wired: a presidential endorsement
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
crc3 August 19th, 2016 at 10:57
Nice!!
Red Mann August 19th, 2016 at 11:47
There you go, the Evil Agenda of the Left!!!111!!!
The Original Just Me August 19th, 2016 at 12:49
Nice isn’t it ?
anothertoothpick August 19th, 2016 at 14:57
The folks at Wired know that there is no future in conservatism.
In science or nature, nothing stays the same or moves backwards. (Make America Great Again).
Like it or not, we have to be progressive in order to survive.