O.J. pal: He’ll confess to murders
A pal of O.J. Simpson, Ron Shipp, says he’s “in total torment” and will confess to murder.
Click here for reuse options!Shipp, a former police officer who testified at Simpson’s 1995 murder trial that he’d been a pal of O.J. for 26 years, says the Juice can only exorcise his demons by coming clean.
“The guy is in total torment today,” Shipp told us at the Los Angeles premiere of ESPN’s “O.J. Simpson: Made in America” docu-series. “Someone told me he is 300 pounds and he looks horrible. O.J. has always felt his appearance meant everything and now, deep down inside, he is starting to live with himself.”
Shipp says when Simpson gets sprung from the Nevada jail where he’s serving time for an unrelated armed robbery conviction — which could be as soon as next year — the Juice will let loose with the truth.
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
18 responses to O.J. pal: He’ll confess to murders
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
whatthe46 June 5th, 2016 at 19:54
no he won’t.
Mensa Member June 5th, 2016 at 20:08
It seems very unlikely. (Especially based on his weight!)
But what if he did?
Obviously, he can’t be retried for the murders. Could a creative prosecutor get him for something?
Jack E Raynbeau June 5th, 2016 at 20:45
There are other things he could be tried for but the statute of limitations is likely up.
One would be giving false information to a police officer if that is a crime in California.
whatthe46 June 5th, 2016 at 21:20
statute of limitations on that is clearly up.
Jack E Raynbeau June 5th, 2016 at 22:46
No doubt, but he said “creative prosecutor”. I’m creative when it comes to hot glass but that’s the best I can do in this situation.
Only the murder charge would be within the time limit. Maybe. I don’t know, civil rights violations?
whatthe46 June 5th, 2016 at 22:52
because this pos was found not guilty, he cannot be retried even if he confessed on national t.v. because of double jeopardy. the prosecutor gets one shot. as for the civil rights violation in a criminal matter, that would be a fed. this wasn’t considered a civil rights violation. with murder, there is no statute of limitations.
Mensa Member June 5th, 2016 at 22:52
I can’t think of anything, either. The whole thing is a travesty of justice.
Mike June 6th, 2016 at 08:33
Not sure how “creative” you’d have to be … Odds are good he’ll break the law again …rich people and celebrity types routinely get away where you or I would be charged. OJ just has to be OJ …
clemans June 6th, 2016 at 09:34
I think the family won a judgement for him causing harm, not sure he ever paid it, but I don’t think there is anything left they can get him for on the murder of the two people.
Unless he has aged to the point where he is calmed down, he might very well commit other crimes.
clemans June 6th, 2016 at 09:27
most of us know he is guilty in our minds, so I don’t care what he says or when he says it. If it means anything to the families then I hope he at least tells them the truth. I don’t have a need to hear from OJ ever again.
amongoose June 6th, 2016 at 10:17
Violation of federal civil rights was used in the civil rights fight when a local jury would not convict.
Mensa Member June 5th, 2016 at 23:06
Besides O.J. Simpson, of course, I most blame Mark Fuhrman for this travesty of justice.
When the lead detective blatantly lies under oath, it creates reasonable doubt.
I was the only white person I knew who would have voted to acquit.
whatthe46 June 5th, 2016 at 23:10
acquit because of the racist asshat?
Mike June 6th, 2016 at 08:26
Yea, OJ presented no race issue for me … There was never any reason to consider another suspect, OJ did it.
whatthe46 June 6th, 2016 at 08:36
thank you.
clemans June 6th, 2016 at 09:31
it had nothing to do with race for me, even though at the time I didn’t know there was no such thing as race. Furman and the glove gave reasonable doubt and once on a jury, you have to set your feelings aside and go with the facts. I have always believed he was guilty. But I would have voted to acquit because of the things I mentioned….I wouldn’t have liked it, and I believe that many in the jury let him off because he was black.
On one chat show at the time, some women said it was OJ’s right to make his wife behave…….then some said a white woman married to a black man, she got what she deserved……it was a horrible time and awful to hear all of the racist comments from every corner.
Mensa Member June 6th, 2016 at 09:28
Not how I would say it but, well, yeah.
It’s a good reason to not let racist hineytooks on your police force. When they shamelessly perjure themselves, it creates reasonable doubt.
clemans June 6th, 2016 at 09:24
I watched the trail, firmly believed OJ was guilty but I would have had to follow the letter of the law and not go with my “feelings” but what can be proven. Sadly, I would have had to vote to acquit as well. Furman and the glove were the problem for me. They should ahve known the glove would be out of shape due to all of the fluid from that much blood.
I am white too.