Jared Taylor: Trump Best Hope For White People

Posted by | September 1, 2015 09:30 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Radio Interviews


American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor explained to me on radio why he believes Donald Trump is the best hope for white people. White people, he says just “want to be left alone” to live among their own. He says he’s not a white supremacist and that East Asians are more intelligent than whites.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

68 responses to Jared Taylor: Trump Best Hope For White People

  1. Obewon September 1st, 2015 at 09:39

    Xebophobe Jared Taylor: Trump best white hope for Republiklans.
    Next up: Nutty birther Ben Carson chooses indentured GOP servitude.

    • mcalleyboy September 2nd, 2015 at 21:10

      That works if you think White people are the only racists, I feel if lived overseas for years, this would never have been posted because in reality it’s nonsense, it’s time you protect the American race and stop race baiting. Americans are far from racist and minority and immigrant’s are protected by advocacy groups, good luck finding yourself an advocacy group overseas or a citizen that gives a hoot about you.

      So pick any race and without a doubt they are racist, bigots and they don’t want to blend in, they also won’t hire you, they’d rather hire their own, you are about to become a dinosaur with that thinking.

      • Obewon September 2nd, 2015 at 21:17

        Delusional-disorder Paranoid example e.g. “it’s time you protect the American race” Blah-blah blah.

        And aren’t you the clown who posted ‘Trump will bring class back to the White House.’ Convicted racist Trump is the furthest thing from ‘classy’ in most Hispanics, legacy minorities and most any other likely voters mind.

  2. Suzanne McFly September 1st, 2015 at 09:43

    More proof showing why rumpster should never be elected.

    • The Original Just Me September 1st, 2015 at 10:21

      I’m beginning to think Both Parties have a Rumpster.

      • Suzanne McFly September 1st, 2015 at 11:52

        Who is the rumpster on the left?

        • The Original Just Me September 1st, 2015 at 12:30

          I may be wrong, ( Did I say that ? ) but I’m starting to see a lot of similarities between Trump’s campaign style and Sander’s campaign style. Both are giving Ideal type promises and are pushing hard to attract the easily enthused populace. I’m not talking about subject matter but rather campaign tactics. They are both, also, starting to bad mouth the same people on both sides to gain enthusiasm for themselves. I just see a lot of similarities in their campaigns tactics and progress.

          • Suzanne McFly September 1st, 2015 at 12:40

            Ok, you are referring to appeal strategies not policy. I will agree with that, I just thought you were saying we have someone with a similar personality disorder as rumpster does. I feel much better now :)

            • The Original Just Me September 1st, 2015 at 12:54

              Yes, I guess it is kind of hard to explain but that is what I was getting at. Their policies are Oil and Water. I like Bernie but I think he is just a little over the top on some things. Too much enthusiasm I guess. I’m kind of a quiet, bashful, sort of guy. And that is a campaign promise.

              • Suzanne McFly September 1st, 2015 at 13:00

                I don’t get that bashful vibe from you, but if that is what your going with it’s okay with me lol.

          • Robert Kennedy September 1st, 2015 at 20:45

            But Sanders never lies and Trump almost never tell the truth. Also doing what Sanders espouses would lead to recovery and following Trump’s agenda would be Bush on steroids.

            • The Original Just Me September 2nd, 2015 at 00:27

              I did cover that but I will word it differently. I am not comparing their policies or their personalities. I am only comparing their Campaign style and methods. There are a lot of similarities in both campaigns on these basis.

  3. allison1050 September 1st, 2015 at 09:50

    Okay, so this racist pig has clarified for everyone that he’s certainly not a reader of history of any time period or country.

    • rg9rts September 1st, 2015 at 10:04

      Wrong….the Official Gopee History as WE Remember It…Texas edition 2014

      • allison1050 September 1st, 2015 at 10:07

        Hiee! What cha been doing with yourself? Have you started canning yet?

      • allison1050 September 1st, 2015 at 10:11

        lol

      • The Original Just Me September 1st, 2015 at 10:18

        as WE “Rewrote” it.

    • The Original Just Me September 1st, 2015 at 10:19

      He took history classes in Texas Public schools.

      • allison1050 September 1st, 2015 at 10:22

        You must be right!

        • The Original Just Me September 1st, 2015 at 12:35

          Please don’t call me Right. I am Independent. Therefore I may be correct but I prefer not to be RIGHT. Just having my usual fun. Good Morning.

  4. whatthe46 September 1st, 2015 at 09:55

    and they breed.

    • rg9rts September 1st, 2015 at 10:01

      Cept for that guy in Alabama that has a real thing for shep

      • rg9rts September 1st, 2015 at 10:02

        LOL got ya at work…go ahead keep a straight face

  5. rg9rts September 1st, 2015 at 10:02

    The loon calls

  6. mrbigstuff September 1st, 2015 at 10:26

    The Republican base has found there man House Negro Carson thought he would get the support

  7. Carla Akins September 1st, 2015 at 11:58

    Oh, good grief. My hope is that one day these people will realize how they appear to the rest of the world.

  8. jybarz September 1st, 2015 at 15:30

    ‘Apartheid’ comes to mind when he said white people just want to be left alone.
    He’s probably right that Trump-et is the great white hope because he’s going to build a great wall, like nobody can build as good as he can, along the borders to stop colored people (brown, black, green) from entering the country and kick out millions of them as well.

  9. John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 15:31

    I find it funny here that none of the criticism of Mr. Taylor involves anything more than personal insults. You’d think that if what he said truly as wrong as some of the commenters seem to think, that at least one of you would be able present an actual argument purporting to show how and why he’s wrong.

    • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 17:15

      We are a country born of immigrants of all races and ethnicities, being the best for white supremacists is against everything our country is and will remain to be…multi-colored and beautiful.

      • John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 18:00

        1) Once again, neither you nor anyone else has presented so much as a single argument purporting to show how something Mr. Taylor said was wrong.

        2) I have no idea what “being the best for white supremacists is against everything our country” actually means. I also don’t see anyone here advocating such an utterly vague idea. Thus, not only do I fail to understand the meaning of what you said, but also fail to understand the relevance.

        • arc99 September 1st, 2015 at 18:40

          Jared Taylor has not spoken to every single white person in this country. I doubt if he has spoken with a plurality of white people.

          The same can be said for me.

          So how in the world do you propose we “prove” this statement to be wrong… White people, he says just “want to be left alone” to live among their own.

          That is his OPINION and it does not describe any white person I know. When someone presents his offensive OPINION as a fact, the only appropriate response is another OPINION.

          EDIT: I would add that I know several white people who are strong supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders. So clearly, those Sanders supporters do not think Trump is the best hope for white people.

          • John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 20:11

            Someone could be “the best hope” for a certain population in spite of the fact that some fraction of that population openly disliked him and in spite of the fact that he or she hadn’t spoken to every single member of that population. These notions are not inconsistent.

            For instance, many people believe (with some reason) that FDR was the best hope for Americans to get out of the great depression. I suspect almost no one who believes this is under any illusions that FDR spoke with every single American, or, that all Americans supported the policies FDR had enacted at the time (they did not).

            “So how in the world do you propose we “prove” this statement to be
            wrong… White people, he says just “want to be left alone” to live
            among their own.”….”That is his OPINION and it does not describe any white person I know.”

            I’m glad you asked this actually. This idea can be tested by seeing whether or not White people (when left to their own devices), tend to have little to no racial preferences in their own personal lives. By this I mean in terms of: the neighborhoods Whites choose to live in, who they like being around and who they choose to befriend, who they marry, who they’d be willing sacrifice for, and how they respond to increased racial diversity in the areas in which they live and work.

            A large number of studies (a small fraction of which I can link you if you’re curious), have consistently shown that when a formerly White neighborhood increasingly becomes non-White, that White people overwhelmingly tend to leave that neighborhood. Even a seemingly minuscule change from a formerly all White neighborhood transitioning to a 92% white neighborhood, on average, can be enough to produce significant levels of White flight.

            The totality of evidence points to the conclusion that Whites generally prefer to be with and to live next to people like themselves. When this condition isn’t met, and when they have the means, Whites tend to leave “diverse” area in favor of other areas with higher concentrations of White people. Whites are not exceptional in this regard either. When historically Black neighborhoods become increasingly Hispanic, Blacks in the area tend to flee in favor of moving to other places with higher concentrations of Black people. Members of all other racial groups exhibit this very same tendency. Members of all racial groups (on average) tend to prefer being with their own kind and they tend to flee from racial diversity when they able to so do.

            In addition, Whites are far more likely to be friends with other whites, to marry other whites, to form relationships with other Whites, to exhibit altruistic tendencies towards other whites, than would ever be expected under assumption that Whites had no racial preference for their own kind. The evidence, in fact, supports the idea that Whites really do prefer people like themselves, so much so that they tend to avoid people who aren’t in many facets of life.

            Once again, this preference for similarity is not a characteristic that is unique to White people in any way. Blacks tend to exhibit the same sorts of tendencies towards other Blacks, Hispanics towards other Hispanics, and Asians towards other Asians.

            Large representative studies have concluded that holding other relevant variables constant, that racial diversity destroys trust of neighbors, trust of members of one’s own race, and trust of members of other races, and that it generally reduces just about every kind of social capital you can think of.

            In saying that Whites want to be left alone to be with people like themselves, Mr. Taylor isn’t expressing a sentiment White people often talk about. Nor is he expressing sentiments many Whites consciously think about. However, his statement largely describes the reality how most Whites actually feel and behave in the real-world when left to their own devices (even if many wouldn’t willingly admit this reality to themselves).

            “I would add that I know several white people who are strong supporters
            of Sen. Bernie Sanders. So clearly, those Sanders supporters do not
            think Trump is the best hope for white people.

            True, but someone could be the best hope for someone even if that person dissented. For instance, suppose a doctor almost nobody had heard of was on the verge of inventing a simple pill that immediately cured all cancer. He could be “the best hope for cancer being cured” even though nobody had heard of him. Similarly, even if nearly everyone thought the doctor was a crank… if his eventual discovery panned out, he could still be (in some sense) “the best hope for cancer patients.”

            • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 20:55

              black people are deviant, pathological and dissapated.

              color of crime…a booklet, based on bias and lies used by all white supremacists to claim superiority.

              when blacks are left alone, all civilization disappears

              david duke and jamie kelso…klan leader and stormfront leader always invited to his meeting and conferences to speak.

              writes for VDARe

              speaks at the racist national policy institute

              now fck off loser

              • arc99 September 1st, 2015 at 20:58

                thank you for the reminder as to how full of sh*t this guy is….

                • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 21:05

                  Went right to his siteand SPLC

            • arc99 September 1st, 2015 at 20:56

              The bottom line is that all of this is still Taylor’s opinion.

              You chastise the participants in this forum for failure to accomplish what is not possible, e.g. prove that someone’s OPINION is wrong.

              Taylor’s opinion is no more correct or incorrect than the opinion of the Sanders supporters. And it certainly does not describe anything happening in my household or my extended family. I am black. My wife is white, and in my OPINION, Taylor is full of sh*t.

            • Pablo September 2nd, 2015 at 02:26

              As a racialist, he should knew that not all people from Latin America are of negroid descent, or are mixed for that matter, there are many Whites in South America. Funnily enough, in the past, people from Latin Europe (e.g. Italians) were not considered White either in the United States.

              Why are some people referred to as immigrants while others, expats when many expats have no intention of going back to their country of origin. I’ve been told that Indian people are now being referred to as expats, while living in some Western nations, thanks to India’s recent developments in the field of technology, not a while ago there was no chance they’d be granted such privilege.

              I know of people from Eastern Europe being referred as immigrants (term often associated with non-Whites), while working in wealthier countries than their own. The race argument may well be a rhetorical strategy to steer away from the real economical motivations when it comes to immigration.

              • John Jensen September 2nd, 2015 at 04:31

                At no point in the video above did I hear Mr. Taylor claim or directly imply that all people from Latin America are either mixed or of African descent.

                Also, as far as the alleged distinction between immigrants and expats… perhaps this is due to my own ignorance, but I fail to see

                the relevance these statements have with regard to what JT said in the video or to what is being sensibly discussed here.

                The race argument is a rhetorical strategy to steer the public away from the real economical motivations.

                1) What race argument?

                2) Presumably whichever racial argument you’re referring to must be one espoused by Mr. Taylor. If that’s the case, then you appear to be suggesting that JT is deliberately being dishonest in the sense that that he allegedly “knows” the real economic motivations that compel people to behave in a certain way, yet uses sophistry and rhetoric to steer people away from the truth. If that’s a fair characterization of your claim, then that’s a bold claim; that would require a lot of evidence to justify. Yet I don’t see that you’ve provided any.

        • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 19:17

          white supremacist talk and bigotry is wrong

          • John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 20:29

            You realize that insinuating that someone happens to be immoral isn’t actually an argument, right? I’m hoping there is more to your thought process than mere name-calling.

            • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 20:38

              fact.

              • John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 20:52

                Then please, dazzle me with clear thinking and a well reasoned argument.

                • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 20:59

                  shut up and look further down the thread you inbred racist.

            • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 20:47

              facts, new century white supremacist blog and his even filthier magazine. Go back to your klan

        • William September 1st, 2015 at 20:27

          Once again, neither you nor anyone else has presented so much as a single argument purporting to show how something Mr. Taylor said was right

          • John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 20:40

            1) Actually I did just that in my comment to arc99.

            2) Prior to that comment, I made no claims one way or the other about the rightness or wrongness of anything Mr. Taylor had said. Since the burden of proof is always on the person making a claim, it follows that I had no burden of proof to meet until I actually made a claim about what JT said.

            3) I’m not accusing you of this, but I happen to think that if a person happens to argue controversial position on the kind of issue that can be settled with rational arguments, that its especially juvenile if his or her detractors are unable to offer a counterargument, and instead resort to mere name-calling, mockery, and other shaming tactics.

            • William September 1st, 2015 at 20:57

              Actually, you’re simply a troll trying to illicit a response by spewing your racist crap.
              The very fact that you could support a 4 times bankrupt circus clown for president completely negates any shred of credibility you think you have.
              and BTW. I didn’t resort to name calling, but as long as you mentioned it. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5ad4d21ca03eba6571b4ee408344698c98a70a17d314412d941f7001e2a83dcd.jpg

              • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 21:00

                Most of what he said came straight from the taylor website and magazine

                • William September 1st, 2015 at 21:10

                  I hate cut and paste racists almost as much as I hate Illinois Nazis. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f1ca6d265e46ea3076037ad0acc11534751b590f844980ddb43b1519f52258be.jpg

                • John Jensen September 2nd, 2015 at 00:39

                  No, what I said actually comes from peer reviewed journal articles and large academic studies. Furthermore, whether or not there is content on JT’s website that happens to agree with anything I’ve said is totally irrelevant. This is because even if Mr. Taylor’s website was sole source for all the claims I’ve made (it isn’t even one of them), it is nevertheless true that a claims origin has absolutely nothing to do with its truth value.

                  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/genetic-fallacy?q=Genetic+Fallacy

                  Now, If you want me to provide citations/links to many of the claims I’ve made on white flight, racial similarity preferences, etc., here you go:

                  http://www.econ.ucla.edu/lboustan/research_pdfs/research02_whiteflight.pdf

                  http://macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf

                  http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n%202005-1.pdf

                  http://tinyurl.com/pwgpgxv

                  “black people are deviant, pathological and dissapated

                  What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with topics at hand.

                  color of crime…a booklet, based on bias and lies used by all white supremacists to claim superiority.

                  1) We’re not talking about crime

                  2) We’re even not talking about other things JT has said on other occasions. Yet again you bring up material that is completely irrelevant to the conversation at hand

                  3) Simply proclaiming that a booklet or study (or whatever) is allegedly based on lies, and merely proclaiming that it has allegedly been used for nefarious purposes… isn’t even an argument. It’s an empty assertion.

                  4) You then go on say Went right to… [the] SPLC. If you actually know anything about the SPLC and/or how they do business, using them as an source to support a claim of “bias” is literally an epic case of the pot calling the kettle black.

                  when blacks are left alone, all civilization disappears

                  Once again, what is this claim and what does it have to do with the price of tea in China?

                  david duke and jamie kelso…klan leader and stormfront leader always invited to his meeting and conferences to speak…. writes for VDARe; speaks at the racist national policy institute

                  1) Setting aside the truth or falsity of your claim, what you’ve said here has absolutely nothing to do with that we’re talking about.

                  2) If I recall correctly, the Conferences Jared Taylor organizes are open to absolutely everyone who wants to attend as long as they follow certain rules of dress/conduct. Moreover, I believe David Duke has actually been banned from his conference for violating those rules.

                  3) To my knowledge neither David Duke nor Jamie Kelso have ever been specifically “invited” to a conference hosted by Jared Taylor, nor have either of them ever been speakers at the conference (as far as I know).

                  4) All of this is little more than the guilt by association fallacy. A claim is no more true and no less false simply because its author happens to have some degree of association with disreputable characters. This is true for you, this is true for me, and this is even true for Jared Taylor.

                  5) Calling the NPI and VDARE the r-word is yet another instance of name-calling used instead of an actual argument.

                  now fck off loser

                  If anyone’s a loser, its the person who uses guilt by association, name-calling, and shaming tactics to cover up her apparent inability to offer rational arguments in an intellectually honest fashion.

                  • tracey marie September 2nd, 2015 at 12:22

                    peer review, the klan reviewed the stormfront articles.

                    • John Jensen September 2nd, 2015 at 13:02

                      >Journal of Scandinavian Political Studies
                      >The Quarterly Journal of Economics
                      >Journal of Nations and Nationalism
                      >University of Chicago’s General Social Survey

                      Apparently the “Klan” is a lot more intellectual than I gave them credit for.

              • John Jensen September 1st, 2015 at 22:40

                For the record I wasn’t accusing you of name-calling.

                “The very fact that you could support a 4 times bankrupt circus clown for president completely negates any shred of credibility you think you have.”
                If you recall, at no point did I ever claim to support Donald Trump. On the contrary I merely argued that what JT said about Trump was not contradicted by the fact that not all White people happen to with him and given the fact that JT hasn’t spoken to all White people.

                Furthermore, the origin of a claim is wholly irrelevant to its truth value. I could support a schizophrenic homeless person coked out of his mind for president and the truth value literally everything I’ve ever said throughout my entire life would remain unchanged. To claim otherwise is to invariably commit the genetic fallacy.

            • tracey marie September 1st, 2015 at 20:59

              You lie, you posted his racist bs.

      • Publius Pompilius Quietus September 2nd, 2015 at 08:14

        An immigrant is a person who goes through the legalistic process of becoming a legal resident/citizen of a state that is not their own. The founders of the United States and their forefathers did no such thing. Indeed, the United States may only be considered a nation of immigrants in the sense that it absorbed immigrants through its history, but so does every other nation. And, until 1965, immigration policy guaranteed the maintenance of the historical white majority; and immigration fluctuated with economic conditions. Hence, the United States is not nor has ever been the dogmatic immigration nation that you have imagined. Moreover, Taylor’s racial views would be very common in the United States of any era before the 1950s. It is, instead, liberals who are out of sync with traditional American attitudes toward race relations.

  10. amersham46 September 1st, 2015 at 19:55

    well Trump would be best for the 1%ers

    • Robert Kennedy September 1st, 2015 at 20:42

      Those are the only ones for sure.

    • Publius Pompilius Quietus September 2nd, 2015 at 08:04

      Current immigration policy floods the labor market and hence makes it easier for corporations to reduce wages for workers. A consistent person who is concerned with corporate greed would oppose massive immigration because of its negative impact on the poor.

  11. Böcker September 2nd, 2015 at 08:15

    How sad that a white loser wants another “white loser” to be President. No thanks.

  12. Mstr Rick September 2nd, 2015 at 18:09

    Well done to Jared Taylor and Amren. Great publicity!

Leave a Reply