Pat Robertson: ‘Love Affairs Between Men And Animals Absolutely Will Be Permitted’
I know I shouldn’t be surprised by anything televangelist Pat Robertson says, but I have to admit what he declared on his show today made me do a double and triple-take.
According to Robertson, now that the Supreme Court has legalized same-sex marriage in the United States, the next step will be for the high court to give the OK to sex between humans and animals, and, eventually, between adults and children.
Yeah, he really said that.
Here’s the first part of what Reverend Pat’s said Tuesday on his show:
You watch what’s going to happen now. They’ve just said abortion is a constitutional right, they have said homosexuality is a constitutional right, they’ve said now homosexual marriage is a constitutional right. Watch what happens, love affairs between men and animals are going to be absolutely permitted. Polygamy, without question, is going to be permitted. And it will be called a right….READ MORE at LiberalAmerica.org
Copyright 2015 Liberaland
By: Andrew Bradford
Andrew Bradford is an author, academic, and political activist who lives in Atlanta. He is a Senior Writer for Liberal America and also has his own blog at deepleftfield.info
188 responses to Pat Robertson: ‘Love Affairs Between Men And Animals Absolutely Will Be Permitted’
« Previous 1 2Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 21:14
They grow a whole lot of these in the ghettos. Democrats just don’t want to discuss it.
tracey marie July 21st, 2015 at 21:27
cactis may grow in the ghetto, but pri*cks grow at brietbart
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 21:31
You seem blind to the cacti you are growing.
tiredoftea July 21st, 2015 at 21:16
“…love affairs between men and animals are going to be absolutely permitted. Polygamy, without question, is going to be permitted”, says Uncle Nutty, longingly.
tiredoftea July 21st, 2015 at 21:16
You are an idiot.
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 21:23
Socrates would agree. He said the same thing about himself. BTW.. You don’t seem ready to discuss. Am I wrong?
tiredoftea July 21st, 2015 at 23:01
Get over yourself. BTW, I’m only stating an observable fact.
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 23:22
Fact? You are ignorant of what a fact is.
fahvel July 22nd, 2015 at 05:13
sorry dumbo, you lose – tired is sooooo correct.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 22:59
Sorry, could not decipher your sentence.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 23:12
hadn’t noticed losing. Do you have some measure or standard?
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 23:11
What fact have you observed? You didn’t state one.
Bunya July 22nd, 2015 at 14:31
In my opinion, this is a government subsidies issue. The reason incest is prohibited is because their offspring have a greater chance of suffering significant congenital defects, thereby placing more burden on the taxpayer to support them. And polygamists may not be able to support all the children conceived by all the wives, thereby forcing them to collect government subsidies – placing another burden on the taxpayer.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 16:13
I agree on your cost idea. Only thing is.. we are talking people’s “rights”. Mother daughter marriages and Father son marriages would of course not cost any more for welfare than it does now. Lots of things could be done to mitigate birth defects, including pre-birth check-ups and of course councelling etc etc. Welfare does cost a lot of taxpayer’s monies, asking/ requiring people on welfare to work has worked in the past to reduced dependency by 50% and more. Thank you for your comments.
Bunya July 22nd, 2015 at 16:55
Personally, if consenting adults want to have more than one wife or want to marry their sisters, I have no problem with it – as long as polygamists know the state will not support all their wives and children, and those into incest have themselves sterilized.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 20:11
I dare-say you will eventually get your wish for polygamy and incest. Where you will fail is with either of your suggestions.. welfare payments will not be affected negatively due to liberal pressure groups and Democrat politicians seeking to grow the welfare state. Incestuous relationships will never be sterilized as you wished. Same liberal and leftist interest groups that will seek polygamy will never allow that. Neither would most conservatives for Constitutional reasons as well as religious and traditional reasons.
Bunya July 23rd, 2015 at 09:49
I didn’t say I wished for polygamy and incest to become legal. I said I didn’t care. And if you’re religion dictates same sex marriage is a “sin”, then take it up with your priest/pastor/preacher/rabbi, etc, because another thing I pretty much don’t care about is what your god says.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 22:58
Thank you thank you. You have no problem with it. A lot of hate has come my way for suggesting the same idea. Evidently you can get away with saying this. I get hell and then some for the very same proposition.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 23:09
So you will not support polygamy marriage if welfare benefits are granted. Will leftists and Democrats likely agree with this idea?
Bunya July 22nd, 2015 at 17:02
Also, equal rights is a good thing, considering it doesn’t become a burden on others. For example, gay marriage is no problem because both people are usually self-sufficient, don’t rely on government subsidies, and are not an drain on society.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 21:03
Also Bunya.. thanks for the discourse. The hate and name calling I have received on this site from suggesting polygamy and adult incest as the next step in re-figuring marriage.. differs from the likes you received from some of the same people who evidently hate the very same idea when I suggest it.
Dwendt44 July 21st, 2015 at 21:38
Not that facts matter, but incest and polygamy have been outlawed for centuries. Very, very unlikely the Supremes will change that.
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 21:42
Gay marriage was too. Was illegal for millennia. It all depends on how the Supremes feel on a given day.
whatthe46 July 21st, 2015 at 22:40
20 countries have legalized gay marriages. just so you know.
tiredoftea July 21st, 2015 at 23:00
Not that it matters to the reality challenged!
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 23:27
Amen to that. Reality and truth matter.
Dancquill July 21st, 2015 at 23:26
All countries outlaw polygamy and incest. Excepting some Muslim countries. Just so you know, there are many more challenges ahead.
whatthe46 July 21st, 2015 at 23:30
so incest being outlawed in the states means what exactly? that it isn’t happening? guess you’ve never heard of sister wives (although not legally married) or utah. lazy ass men with countless “wives” and countless children all living off welfare.
fahvel July 22nd, 2015 at 05:12
you are rather dumb and ill-informed – do you dance with a quill?
Dwendt44 July 22nd, 2015 at 01:47
But only recently. It was unConstitutional, so it’s now legal. Equal protection mean anything to you?
The laws against polygamy and incest are there for completely different reasons.
Dancquill July 22nd, 2015 at 10:12
But you haven’t offered any reasons why equal protection under the law does not apply to polygamists and adult incest marriage. Do you even care about equal protection under the law?
Tommie July 22nd, 2015 at 00:16
People are going overboard with these insane comments!
mcalleyboy July 22nd, 2015 at 00:27
Not really it’s an issue and has been an issue, not only phisically but financially. How many people give up on humans and when they die they leave their fortunes to animals, now that’s insane.
Tommie July 22nd, 2015 at 01:59
That is true, but i was thinking he was thinking marriage but maybe not! Your point stands!
fahvel July 22nd, 2015 at 05:10
damn, three dogs, one frog and two women – should make a progressive happy – Robertson is a pathetic slug trail and, except for amusement?, should be eliminated from the known universe and sent to his deity.
Elliot J. Stamler July 22nd, 2015 at 21:26
YES….If Robertson says so its gotta be true…Pat gets messages, dreams, visions, phone calls from GOD! Listen all your readers of Liberaland, you gotta STOP this bestiality. There’s only one way to do it. SEND MONEY TO PAT. LOTS OF MONEY. SEND IT. NOW!!!!
P.S. These men will be having sex with MALE animals – oh lord, it’s even worse…gay bestiality!!!!!!! Huckabee, Santorum..save us, save us.
Allison Renée Alworth July 22nd, 2015 at 21:33
Envious, Pat?
John_St_John July 22nd, 2015 at 23:58
And he can’t wait to partake of his favorite poodle. Would have to be a tea cup poodle to accommodate him I am speculating.
Bunya July 23rd, 2015 at 09:52
“So you will not support polygamy marriage if welfare benefits…”
No, I won’t, because their marriage will most likely impact me personally. I don’t care what anybody does, as long as it doesn’t affect me.
liber8tor . July 23rd, 2015 at 10:41
‘Ol Pat has kept sheep for years. Never sells any wool or anything…..
Snick1946 July 23rd, 2015 at 10:51
Well now we know how Pat came to be..
liberalMD July 26th, 2015 at 06:34
I know many people with household pets who have a warm personal attachment
or love of their pet. I am almost certain none of them are fornicating
with their pet.
Pat, we’ve discussed this before….get back on your medications. And
you must take them every day.