White House Says Elizabeth Warren Trade Amendment Could Hurt Financial Reform
The Democratic proxy war between President Obama and the Warren wing continues to roil this week. Along with the lingering bitterness over ugly accusations of sexism, the White House continued to counter-attack on the substance of Warren’s positions on trade.
On Tuesday, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) followed up her “Broken Promises” trade report by releasing an amendment to the current Trade Promotion Authority legislation that she said would safeguard financial regulatory reform from attack by Republicans in future trade deals. “This President supports financial reform – but he cannot stop the next President from caving to the big banks in a future trade deal,” Warren said in a press release, adding “With European officials, Republicans, and giant banks on both sides of the Atlantic pushing hard to undermine financial regulation in the upcoming TTIP agreement, this amendment is the best way to ensure that future Presidents can’t use this fast track bill to undermine Dodd-Frank.”
When asked about the amendment, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told Bloomberg’s Justin Sink that the language proposed by Warren could make it easier to undermine Dodd-Frank…READ MORE
Copyright 2015 Liberaland
3 responses to White House Says Elizabeth Warren Trade Amendment Could Hurt Financial Reform
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
frambley1 May 20th, 2015 at 22:13
I hate it when Mom and Dad fight.
Senator Warren’s judgment carries alot of weight, but President Obama has been killing it lately on progressive causes. But Republican’s reach around to get this thing through can only be a bad sign for Mr Obama’s argument here.
greenfloyd May 21st, 2015 at 01:41
I just got her report so have not read it all yet. Her main concern seems to be lack of enforcement on things like child labor, working conditions, building unions in places like Colombia. I still have faith Obama would never promote a deal that did not address these important issues. Nonetheless we deserve a full and open debate on the issues; is “free trade” more important than “Fair Trade?”
fahvel May 21st, 2015 at 03:10
you have one very bright and perceptive person in Ms. Warren.