Images: Open Carry Activists In Texas Followed Ferguson Protesters Around

Posted by | November 27, 2014 13:15 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Top Stories

Republish
Reprint


What Ferguson protesters don’t need are Open Carry activists stomping their feet on the streets while fanning the flames, but they just had to have their “Look at me!” moment.

Governor-elect Greg Abbott said, “Texas as I understand it is one of only about 7 or so states in the United States of America that doesn’t have open carry.”

Without further ado, here they are, Abbott’s army of miscreants.

Come And Take It Texas, the gun rights group, decided to follow Ferguson protesters who were marching in Dallas.

This is what they think of the protesters, or as they call them, “ni**ers”.

Comments came in:

Three Open Carry activists arrived on the scene to hang outside of Dallas police headquarters, because the cops really need their help.

This picture was featured with the heading on Facebook, “Glad to see patriots out ready to prevent looters.”


This gosh darned patriot has his finger on the trigger, just waitin’ for any trouble that comes his way. His name is Shawn and he’s patrolling Galveston Island.

Adam calls this  his “Medium range zombie gun.”

This is Eric. He’ ‘s a bathroom warrior. You can never have too many of those.

 

More on the guys who followed protesters around.

Wait a second here. The guy on the left is Guy Potter. He went out with Kory Watkins (R-Fedora) recently to shoot up a female mannequin. Gosh, thank you for protecting us from inanimate objects with your inanimate object.

 

The guy next to Guy has a GoFundMe account set up to buy a plate carrier vest like this one:

 

It states, “Help two American patriots reach our goal to raise funds to purchase plate carriers, we are working hard in Texas to preserve the American way of life and help insure our children’s future is secured.”

The open carry advocates said they respected the marchers’ right to protest but decided to show up to protect private property. (I refer you back to the above screenshots where they compare black people to chimps.)

Watch:

Imagine if we went out on the streets with rifles during Tea Party protests under the guise of ensuring the safety of other people’s property. But, that would just be too crazy.

Big thanks for my friend out there for collecting the screen shots.

All images obtained via social media thereby making them fair use. 

 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100

120 responses to Images: Open Carry Activists In Texas Followed Ferguson Protesters Around

  1. Jeff Maanum November 28th, 2014 at 08:40

    The tiny penis club was out in force.

  2. Jeff Maanum November 28th, 2014 at 09:40

    The tiny penis club was out in force.

  3. fedupintx November 28th, 2014 at 11:18

    “Imagine if we went out on the streets with rifles during Tea Party protests under the guise of ensuring the safety of other people’s property. But, that would just be too crazy.” Yeah that would be crazy, because 1) the Tea Party protests have no history of violence, 2) you’d just be mistaken for another Tea Partier and 3) most of them are the ones concerned about protecting other people’s property in the first place, that’s why they formed.

    • OldLefty November 28th, 2014 at 11:37

      You mean those who call for 2nd amendment solutions?

      “Yeah that would be crazy, because 1) the Tea Party protests have no history of violence”

      1) Except for those who do.
      2) Neither do most of the citizens of Ferguson. That’s why the vast majority who were arrested were from outside.

      • Dwayne Hinton November 28th, 2014 at 21:09

        and EVERYONE is a responsible gun owner.

        until the day they aren’t. and that applies to folks hiding behind badges as well.

    • Dwayne Hinton November 28th, 2014 at 21:07

      just don’t lose a game… amirite?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Vancouver_Stanley_Cup_riot

  4. fedupintx November 28th, 2014 at 12:18

    “Imagine if we went out on the streets with rifles during Tea Party protests under the guise of ensuring the safety of other people’s property. But, that would just be too crazy.” Yeah that would be crazy, because 1) the Tea Party protests have no history of violence, 2) you’d just be mistaken for another Tea Partier and 3) most of them are the ones concerned about protecting other people’s property in the first place, that’s why they formed.

    • OldLefty November 28th, 2014 at 12:37

      You mean those who call for 2nd amendment solutions?

      “Yeah that would be crazy, because 1) the Tea Party protests have no history of violence”

      1) Except for those who do.
      2) Neither do most of the citizens of Ferguson. That’s why the vast majority who were arrested were from outside.

      • Dwayne Hinton November 28th, 2014 at 22:09

        and EVERYONE is a responsible gun owner.

        until the day they aren’t. and that applies to folks hiding behind badges as well.

    • Dwayne Hinton November 28th, 2014 at 22:07

      just don’t lose a game… amirite?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Vancouver_Stanley_Cup_riot

  5. wesleyangun November 28th, 2014 at 12:05

    Good to see open carry advocates policing the anarchists. Being citizens, they have fewer restrictions on legal use of force and knowing the disturbed psychological condition of most anarchists, the presence of lawfully owned firearms had to be a deterrent to bad behavior. We could stand more of this when anarchists or “sovereign citizens” (actually they are two side of the same coin) take to the streets.

  6. tracey marie November 28th, 2014 at 12:05

    that is great

    • Kaakstorm November 30th, 2014 at 05:49

      I’m very sorry to see the folks on the other side of the spectrum starting to sound just like you people, filled with hate and animosity. I hope it keeps you warm at night.

  7. wesleyangun November 28th, 2014 at 13:05

    Good to see open carry advocates policing the anarchists. Being citizens, they have fewer restrictions on legal use of force and knowing the disturbed psychological condition of most anarchists, the presence of lawfully owned firearms had to be a deterrent to bad behavior. We could stand more of this when anarchists or “sovereign citizens” (actually they are two side of the same coin) take to the streets.

  8. Robyn Ryan November 28th, 2014 at 13:27

    Can we bring back codpieces? They perform the same function, and are decorative, not destructive.

  9. Robyn Ryan November 28th, 2014 at 14:27

    Can we bring back codpieces? They perform the same function, and are decorative, not destructive.

  10. Carla Akins November 29th, 2014 at 04:40

    Well then of course, shoot to kill over how they where their pants.

  11. Mark Baland November 29th, 2014 at 06:12

    If these “patriots” really wanted to stand up to tyranny, they would patrol black neighborhoods and keep cops from shooting people. They are cowardly racists looking for a reason to kill.

    • Kaakstorm November 30th, 2014 at 06:10

      You are talking about a man who would put himself in harms way to protect strangers, I’ve seen him do it without the benefit of long arms. He doesn’t care who you are or where you come from. All of this hate and racism, it is internal and everyone is projecting it outward and it is one of the main reasons we cannot come together as a people and fix our nation together. There are certainly no shortage f agitators and provocateurs. We have been divided and we have been conquered and the only thing between “us” and “them” is our ability to resist and protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our property. Best of luck.

      • Anomaly 100 December 1st, 2014 at 06:04

        “You are talking about a man who would put himself in harms way to protect strangers.”

        We don’t know whoever you’re referring to. He’s a stranger in Ferguson. You expect people to believe you? It doesn’t work like that.

  12. Mark Baland November 29th, 2014 at 07:12

    If these “patriots” really wanted to stand up to tyranny, they would patrol black neighborhoods and keep cops from shooting people. They are cowardly racists looking for a reason to kill.

    • Kaakstorm November 30th, 2014 at 07:10

      You are talking about a man who would put himself in harms way to protect strangers, I’ve seen him do it without the benefit of long arms. He doesn’t care who you are or where you come from. All of this hate and racism, it is internal and everyone is projecting it outward and it is one of the main reasons we cannot come together as a people and fix our nation together. There are certainly no shortage f agitators and provocateurs. We have been divided and we have been conquered and the only thing between “us” and “them” is our ability to resist and protect ourselves, our loved ones, and our property. Best of luck.

      • Anomaly 100 December 1st, 2014 at 07:04

        “You are talking about a man who would put himself in harms way to protect strangers.”

        We don’t know whoever you’re referring to. He’s a stranger in Ferguson. You expect people to believe you? It doesn’t work like that.

  13. Charles Swann November 29th, 2014 at 08:00

    You know I get a little tired of rhetoric from folks saying we should not protect our neighbors businesses and homes but should go protect some community where the folks in the community think so little of it they will not help to do the same thing themselves. Sorry I just do not have pity for most of these communities. I have pity and compassion for the sensible persons lost within them. But for the majority in them I have a feeling of disgust. They want to complain and complain and walk around saying poor me poor him. Yet when it comes to cleaning up their communities of thugs and criminals none of them will step forward. “I did not see anything officer, nobody knows anything sir.” Does not breed anything but contempt for them and their ilk.

    • OldLefty November 29th, 2014 at 08:25

      You know I get a little tired of rhetoric from folks saying we should not protect our

      _______

      Nobody is saying that.
      They are saying that these dingbats are not the people who do it, and only add to the problem.

      I can only say again, I am glad that in MY affluent white suburb, these same “thugs” are considered “normal young and stupid” kids, whom the police protect from their youth and stupidity, as opposed to seeing them as the enemy.

  14. Charles Swann November 29th, 2014 at 09:00

    You know I get a little tired of rhetoric from folks saying we should not protect our neighbors businesses and homes but should go protect some community where the folks in the community think so little of it they will not help to do the same thing themselves. Sorry I just do not have pity for most of these communities. I have pity and compassion for the sensible persons lost within them. But for the majority in them I have a feeling of disgust. They want to complain and complain and walk around saying poor me poor him. Yet when it comes to cleaning up their communities of thugs and criminals none of them will step forward. “I did not see anything officer, nobody knows anything sir.” Does not breed anything but contempt for them and their ilk.

    • OldLefty November 29th, 2014 at 09:25

      You know I get a little tired of rhetoric from folks saying we should not protect our

      _______

      Nobody is saying that.
      They are saying that these dingbats are not the people who do it, and only add to the problem.

      I can only say again, I am glad that in MY affluent white suburb, these same “thugs” are considered “normal young and stupid” kids, whom the police protect from their youth and stupidity, as opposed to seeing them as the enemy.

  15. Valno November 29th, 2014 at 17:09

    Good for them they protected their city and brought 18 cop cars and a swat team. You know there is something wrong when more cops are sent to deal with 2nd amendment supporters than looters.

  16. Valno November 29th, 2014 at 18:09

    Good for them they protected their city and brought 18 cop cars and a swat team. You know there is something wrong when more cops are sent to deal with 2nd amendment supporters than looters.

  17. Kaakstorm November 30th, 2014 at 05:48

    Takes one to know one, I’ll bet you voted for O**** twice didn’t you?

  18. lib1 December 1st, 2014 at 06:14

    These fools aren’t patriots at all. If they were they would SUPPORT the protesters in their grievance against the government rather than follow them around with rifles. This is one reason among many why I don’t support these “patriot” groups as there is a racial animus present in said groups. When whites march with armed rifles and engage in stand-offs with the Feds, it’s seen as “heroic and patriotic.” When unarmed blacks protest in the streets we’re “savage chimps.” It’s disgusting beyond words.

  19. lib1 December 1st, 2014 at 07:14

    These fools aren’t patriots at all. If they were they would SUPPORT the protesters in their grievance against the government rather than follow them around with rifles. This is one reason among many why I don’t support these “patriot” groups as there is a racial animus present in said groups. When whites march with armed rifles and engage in stand-offs with the Feds, it’s seen as “heroic and patriotic.” When unarmed blacks protest in the streets we’re “savage chimps.” It’s disgusting beyond words.

1 2

Leave a Reply