Supreme Court rejects abortion ban law

Posted by | January 25, 2016 13:39 | Filed under: Good News Politics


Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

Show Article

16 responses to Supreme Court rejects abortion ban law

  1. Carla Akins January 25th, 2016 at 13:44

    bout damn time

    • rg9rts January 25th, 2016 at 14:29

      CCCCCCCAAAAAAARRRRRRRLLLLLLAAAAA have to stay in practice

  2. tracey marie January 25th, 2016 at 14:08

    Stay away from womens rights, we have autonomy over our bodies just like men do.

  3. rg9rts January 25th, 2016 at 14:28

    Explain to me IF they KNEW that the law would be a failure do these so called penny pinching conservatives waste the courts , legislatures and everyone else in between time and money??? Are they like the morons in congress wasting their time on ACA repeal 50,000 times when they know it will be vetoed?

    • Mike January 25th, 2016 at 14:37

      It’s considered money well spent…

      • rg9rts January 25th, 2016 at 14:50

        The same could be said about condoms …..LOL

  4. Suzanne McFly January 25th, 2016 at 14:30

    It is good to see the judges don’t always decide according to politics, they are using facts and common sense.

    • rg9rts January 25th, 2016 at 14:32

      Gramps out yet?

      • Suzanne McFly January 25th, 2016 at 14:52

        No, I think we are at the point where he won’t make it out. He misses his dog so we are trying to strengthen him to go home for a visit, but he needs 24/7 care. Thanks for thinking of me :)

        • rg9rts January 26th, 2016 at 01:25

          Thats a tough one…keep me posted…

  5. Patty K. January 25th, 2016 at 17:45

    Why are cars w/ vanity plates ‘choose life’ driven by mostly old white men?

    • Bunya January 25th, 2016 at 21:01

      because old white men yearn for the good old days when they could beat their women to keep them in line. They miss the control, and forcing women to give birth is the only thing left for them to hold onto – and it’s slipping from their fingers real fast.

  6. mistlesuede January 25th, 2016 at 19:20

    So their state legislators think it’s fine to budget $400,000 of the tax payers money to this effort every year? It looks like the voters do not think “discovering the boundaries of Roe v Wade” is something they want to be paying for, no matter what their opinion of the law is.

  7. Snick1946 January 26th, 2016 at 12:00

    This hasn’t been a good past few months for the Lifers. This makes what, about a half dozen or so draconian state laws the court has tossed? The dipshits in state legislatures keep wasting their state’s funding by passing these atrocious laws that common sense alone should have told them would be tossed. They just keep going and going. Probably to appease their ‘base’.

    I might suggest- if you oppose abortion and think it is wrong, if you truly think life begins at conception then maybe a more constructive approach would be to stop being so damned confrontational, stop demonizing Planned Parenthood and work across the aisle to pass constructive legislation to simplify procedures on adoption, increase funding for assistance for single moms, that sort of thing. But then, that wouldn’t be as much fun, would it. Morons..

  8. David Ish January 26th, 2016 at 15:12

    Is this a clue of the the court think about the Texas Abortion case that will be heard March?

Leave a Reply