NRA Supporters Launch Vicious, Misogynistic Twitter Attack On Gun Reform Leader
When Shannon Watts, the founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, was blocked by the NRA on Twitter yesterday, she tweeted it. It shall come as a surprise to no one ever that that was met with a slew of vicious misogynistic remarks by NRA supporters.
The mother of 5 frightens them that much. She’s a beautiful and intelligent woman, so naturally, she’s a threat.
It started with this tweet.
Naturally, that innocuous tweet became a platform to attack the Gun Sense advocate by NRA supporters. The hashtag #ImBlockedByShannonWatts started trending on Twitter.
The alleged human responsible for creating that hashtag is none other than Julie Golob, world shooting champion and author of the book “Shooting While Pregnant.” No, really.
So Ms. Watts is retweeting some vulgar responses to her one tweet.
Oh, this is such a winning strategy.
And this tweet by Katie Pavlich gave the onslaught some legs:
NRA supporters, I have some advice for you. If you want to appear to be female-friendly, don’t call a woman a “Bitch”, a “cunt”, “twat’ or tell her she needs to “get back in the kitchen.”
Include “bimbo” to the list of things not to call a woman.
Ms. Watts isn’t too worried about the vicious attack.
Bring it. Not scared. Won’t be bullied. Blocked by the #NRA @MomsDemand #gunsense pic.twitter.com/wsQATfcr2a
— Shannon (@shannonrwatts) December 27, 2014
Big thanks to my pal out there for collecting the tweets. You rock.
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 15:38
I can only wish Shannon Watts much success in her campaign to change the minds of those in congress to pass sensible legislation in regulating guns and the nra.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:10
common sense in a Republican dictated Congress?
not hardly, but thanks for the nice dream at nap time.
FrancisMcManus December 28th, 2014 at 11:27
Two things would make a big difference, expanded background checks that included on-line sales and expanded gun trafficking enforcement.
Scar December 29th, 2014 at 04:37
When I order from Buds, or any other retailer online, they will only ship to a licensed dealer. When the firearm arrives at the FFL, THEY run the background check on me before I can take possession of the firearm.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 16:38
I can only wish Shannon Watts much success in her campaign to change the minds of those in congress to pass sensible legislation in regulating guns and the nra.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:10
common sense in a Republican dictated Congress?
not hardly, but thanks for the nice dream at nap time.
FrancisMcManus December 28th, 2014 at 12:27
Two things would make a big difference, expanded background checks that included on-line sales and expanded gun trafficking enforcement.
Scar December 29th, 2014 at 05:37
When I order from Buds, or any other retailer online, they will only ship to a licensed dealer. When the firearm arrives at the FFL, THEY run the background check on me before I can take possession of the firearm.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 15:47
Ohhhh please. This woman and organization blocks anybody who has a different opinion. All you have to do is go onto any one of their pages and say anything that is pro-gun or offer a different opinion, and you are automatically blocked and your comment deleted.
There is no dialogue with them, and they will openly tell you that they have no intention of dialogue. So this is no surprise. And yes, I have been blocked also.
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 15:51
I remember the day I got blocked by some guy with E! He was railing on Phil Robertson and how people should be offended with A&E. I commented that it was akin to rationalists being offended by E! for having a show host who billed himself as a psychic.
Which was, of course, him.
So he called me an asshat, blocked me, and took a “victory” lap. :)
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 15:54
Well if you call her the words these fine patriots called her, then yes, you’ll be blocked.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 16:14
Nope, dont even call her words. Offer an alternate view, and you are blocked.
I have been hanging around here for a little while now. And you know I have had some “Less then Polite” comments thrown at me. And rarely do you ever see my temper flare up and retaliate in any vicious manner.
Run an experiment, create a profile, go to their facebook and or twitter and post something that is completely “PRO-GUN” and watch what happens. Dont say anything bad, just have a complete opposite opinion. You will see what I am talking about.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 16:47
With all due respect, I’ve seen some of your tweets about Ferguson. I’ve also seen your ‘love’ for Moms Demand here on LL comment threads. You are respectful here, but on Twitter, you can be divisive. So can I but I admit it:-)
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 17:57
Yes you can, And my tweets about ferguson was in regards to the losers who decided to loot and riot. Show me one tweet, where i said anything negative about anybody who choose to use their first amendment right to protest in a peaceful manner…
And as far as my tweets back to MOMS, yes, after I attempted to engage in dialogue and was told to go fuck off… So yes, Guilty as charged for some of them.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 18:04
When did Shannon Watts tell you to fuck off? I mean, I’m being hit by a gang of trolls right now over this, so if you want to trade hate-tweets, let’s do this thing:-)
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 18:24
no reason for you and me to exchange hate tweets. What I can tell you is, that most, not all who I attempted to engage in dialogue, were as nasty as any NRA troll. I can certainly go back and find them, but no reason.
As far as MOMS pages, again, any person who offers a different position or thought process, will be immediately be banned.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 18:34
Different thought process, like calling a woman a nasty cunt?
Charlie3 December 27th, 2014 at 20:18
Same thought process that makes someone call a black person a n***er. Same attitude. Same bigotry.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 20:38
And you use less colorful words for right wing conservatives ??
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 20:45
Sure I do, while cursing is an acceptable behavior for adults, the use of that particular word toward a women is an extraordinary insult and carries a clear intent of viciousness, subjugation and violence. I only respond “colorfully” to those that instigate it, generally by expressing themselves with a delightful stew of arrogance and ignorance.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 18:51
Different thought process, like calling a woman a nasty c*nt?
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 18:09
As an example:
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 18:22
Personally, that is uncalled for. We may disagree, but find a way to use your words.
Edited: I mistook this as something else at first, hence my original comment.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 18:44
Bwhaa! We may disagree but I got nothin’ but love for you. I would never talk to you like that.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 20:36
No, you would just remind me that I am always “WRONG” !!! =)
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 21:01
MOI?
Pistol-Packing December 28th, 2014 at 07:14
VOUS !!! =)
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 16:47
Ohhhh please. This woman and organization blocks anybody who has a different opinion. All you have to do is go onto any one of their pages and say anything that is pro-gun or offer a different opinion, and you are automatically blocked and your comment deleted.
There is no dialogue with them, and they will openly tell you that they have no intention of dialogue. So this is no surprise. And yes, I have been blocked also.
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 16:51
I remember the day I got blocked by some guy with E! He was railing on Phil Robertson and how people should be offended with A&E. I commented that it was akin to rationalists being offended by E! for having a show host who billed himself as a psychic.
Which was, of course, him.
So he called me an asshat, blocked me, and took a “victory” lap. :)
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 16:54
Well if you call her the words these fine patriots called her, then yes, you’ll be blocked.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 17:14
Nope, dont even call her words. Offer an alternate view, and you are blocked.
I have been hanging around here for a little while now. And you know I have had some “Less then Polite” comments thrown at me. And rarely do you ever see my temper flare up and retaliate in any vicious manner.
Run an experiment, create a profile, go to their facebook and or twitter and post something that is completely “PRO-GUN” and watch what happens. Dont say anything bad, just have a complete opposite opinion. You will see what I am talking about.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 17:47
With all due respect, I’ve seen some of your tweets about Ferguson. I’ve also seen your ‘love’ for Moms Demand here on LL comment threads. You are respectful here, but on Twitter, you can be divisive. So can I but I admit it:-)
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 18:57
Yes you can, And my tweets about ferguson was in regards to the losers who decided to loot and riot. Show me one tweet, where i said anything negative about anybody who choose to use their first amendment right to protest in a peaceful manner…
And as far as my tweets back to MOMS, yes, after I attempted to engage in dialogue and was told to go fuck off… So yes, Guilty as charged for some of them.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 19:04
When did Shannon Watts tell you to fuck off? I mean, I’m being hit by a gang of trolls right now over this, so if you want to trade hate-tweets, let’s do this thing:-)
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 19:24
no reason for you and me to exchange hate tweets. What I can tell you is, that most, not all who I attempted to engage in dialogue, were as nasty as any NRA troll. I can certainly go back and find them, but no reason.
As far as MOMS pages, again, any person who offers a different position or thought process, will be immediately be banned.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 19:34
Different thought process, like calling a woman a nasty cunt?
Charlie3 December 27th, 2014 at 21:18
Same thought process that makes someone call a black person a n***er. Same attitude. Same bigotry.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 21:38
And you use less colorful words for right wing conservatives ??
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 21:45
Sure I do, while cursing is an acceptable behavior for adults, the use of that particular word toward a women is an extraordinary insult and carries a clear intent of viciousness, subjugation and violence. I only respond “colorfully” to those that instigate it, generally by expressing themselves with a delightful stew of arrogance and ignorance.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 19:51
Different thought process, like calling a woman a nasty c*nt?
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 19:09
As an example:
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 19:22
Personally, that is uncalled for. We may disagree, but find a way to use your words.
Edited: I mistook this as something else at first, hence my original comment.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 19:44
Bwhaa! We may disagree but I got nothin’ but love for you. I would never talk to you like that.
Pistol-Packing December 27th, 2014 at 21:36
No, you would just remind me that I am always “WRONG” !!! =)
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 22:01
MOI?
Pistol-Packing December 28th, 2014 at 08:14
VOUS !!! =)
Larry K December 27th, 2014 at 15:56
The offensive language speaks volumes.
Larry K December 27th, 2014 at 16:56
The offensive language speaks volumes.
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 15:59
Gee, a Mom with no guns provokes such a horrible response from all those pistol packing patriots! It doesn’t take much, does it?
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 16:06
She does seem to just target Republicans, though. When she oopsy-accidentally targets a Democrat, she disappears her comments.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 16:11
Well I can’t explain why but I’ve been blocked from retweeting any of their tweets but I’m not going to go ballistic over it.
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 17:34
Gee, only righties can do that?
R.J. Carter December 28th, 2014 at 20:35
Nope. But both can (and should) be called on it when they make it obvious.
tiredoftea December 28th, 2014 at 20:38
Yeah, I can’t get too nuts about this stuff. It seems much ado about nothing.
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 16:59
Gee, a Mom with no guns provokes such a horrible response from all those pistol packing patriots! It doesn’t take much, does it?
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 17:06
She does seem to just target Republicans, though. When she oopsy-accidentally targets a Democrat, she disappears her comments.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 17:11
Well I can’t explain why but I’ve been blocked from retweeting any of their tweets but I’m not going to go ballistic over it.
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 18:34
Gee, only righties can do that?
R.J. Carter December 28th, 2014 at 21:35
Nope. But both can (and should) be called on it when they make it obvious.
tiredoftea December 28th, 2014 at 21:38
Yeah, I can’t get too nuts about this stuff. It seems much ado about nothing.
Sy Colepath December 27th, 2014 at 16:02
To all you gun rights nuts out there:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,…”
“well regulated”;…get it?
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 16:05
“security of a free State…” from whom?
Sy Colepath December 27th, 2014 at 16:20
Well, the Red Coats, of course. Don’t ya know?
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:02
I’m thinking they’ll probably sail up the Missouri in a secret and daring mission to seize Red Lodge Montana. They could set up base camp there and slowly expand out over the years, secretly disguised as Buffalo Hunters in Red Coats. Who could ever guess they were a secret invading Army until – oopsie! -too late.
Charlie3 December 27th, 2014 at 20:13
And protection from rebellious slaves who get uppity.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 16:42
It’s an amendment open to being amended……get it!
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 16:42
Stop revealing my novel plot devices before I finish writing it! Grr!
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 16:45
I have a feeling it won’t mean much as some people were surprised at the ending of the movie TITANIC.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:10
The big azz unsinkable boat sank! – right out there in the middle of the ocean!!! surprised the hell out of me, ’cause the movie was about the boat and the damn think sunk before the movie finished! (sounds like something Don Rickles would come up with on one of his ‘good’ days).
Hirightnow December 27th, 2014 at 17:48
“R.J. Carter” would be a swell name for the protagonist of an action series of trade paperbacks!
He could be Nick Carter‘s younger, more headstrong nephew!
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 16:47
No one is infringing upon your rights if we have background checks, get it?
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 16:50
No response from Donna, but check all the downvotes….ooohhh
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 17:07
She’s about to be banned for supporting Ms. Watts being called a “c*nt.”
I don’t know one Republican personally that would support this kind of talk.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:36
you’re not one for flashing money at Republicans are you?
Hirightnow December 27th, 2014 at 17:24
Wish us normal (Yes, I called myself “normal”) people could see those downvotes…:(
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:35
many lunatics from ages past considered themselves ‘normal’ – hell, I even heard a rumor years ago that Don Rickles use to have day dreams about being normal.
Hirightnow December 27th, 2014 at 17:44
That hockey puck? Gimme a break!
:)
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 17:51
I’d be offended if I was ever considered “normal” especially after seeing what passes as being normal really means.
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 17:59
Bwahaha. She just went thru and downvoted everyone else’s comment. Like we wouldn’t know who did it.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 18:03
Not anymore. I applied her ban retroactively, thus magically disappearing her down votes. Neener!
cogitoergodavesum December 28th, 2014 at 14:07
A retroactive ban? Is that like Double Secret Probation?
Carla Akins December 28th, 2014 at 14:37
Kinda. It removes all the users comments and history from the thread.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:04
evidently not.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:06
no ones saying you can’t be a member of a well regulated militia. Just that you cannot be legally armed in an UNREGULATED militia. NO infringement there.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 17:07
Just wondering, was the cop killer in Las Vegas part of that ‘well regulated militia’, or the one in Pa.or the one in NY last week?
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 17:31
That just mean showing up with their guns and camo clothes more or less on time for a meeting these days. Well, unless you’re OCT Kory, then it’s a snappy hipster hat, too.
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 17:32
Is not infringed, has never been infringed, get that?
Jason Costa December 27th, 2014 at 18:27
Well regulated meant well armed and trained. It has nothing to do with regulations on firearms themselves. There were NO regulations on firearms during those times.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 18:32
Well, they only fired one round, then had to be reloaded fairly slowly, they weren’t used by nuts to mow down dozens of people in a mall, school or theater. Sorry, the Framers didn’t know that guns would become weapons of mass death and the fetish objects of gun nuts in the future.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 18:38
Then I’ll pose the question to you…Just wondering, was the cop killer in Las Vegas part of that ‘well regulated militia’, or the one in Pa.or the one in NY last week?
A militia that is well regulated is one that has control of their members, not everyone can join and those that do are governed or REGULATED as to what they do, where they go and who they fight. It is not a group that comes and goes when they please and who they fight for and against.
Jason December 27th, 2014 at 21:07
Sorry I don’t control thug gang members, I thought you liberals were trying to handle those issues by waving rainbow flags and what not.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 21:12
Why bother commenting when it has nothing to do with the question?
Charlie3 December 27th, 2014 at 20:08
The well regulated militia they had in mind when they wrote the 2nd amendment was for the sole purposes of preventing or putting down any slave revolutions.
KABoink_after_wingnut_hacker December 28th, 2014 at 07:21
That is exactly correct!
And gun nuts conveniently forget that part of our history.
Sy Colepath December 27th, 2014 at 17:02
To all you gun rights nuts out there:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,…”
“well regulated”;…get it?
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 17:05
“security of a free State…” from whom?
Sy Colepath December 27th, 2014 at 17:20
Well, the Red Coats, of course. Don’t ya know?
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 19:02
I’m thinking they’ll probably sail up the Missouri in a secret and daring mission to seize Red Lodge Montana. They could set up base camp there and slowly expand out over the years, secretly disguised as Buffalo Hunters in Red Coats. Who could ever guess they were a secret invading Army until – oopsie! -too late.
Charlie3 December 27th, 2014 at 21:13
And protection from rebellious slaves who get uppity.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 17:42
It’s an amendment open to being amended……get it!
R.J. Carter December 27th, 2014 at 17:42
Stop revealing my novel plot devices before I finish writing it! Grr!
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 17:45
I have a feeling it won’t mean much as some people were surprised at the ending of the movie TITANIC.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 19:10
The big azz unsinkable boat sank! – right out there in the middle of the ocean!!! surprised the hell out of me, ’cause the movie was about the boat and the damn think sunk before the movie finished! (sounds like something Don Rickles would come up with on one of his ‘good’ days).
Hirightnow December 27th, 2014 at 18:48
“R.J. Carter” would be a swell name for the protagonist of an action series of trade paperbacks!
He could be Nick Carter‘s younger, more headstrong nephew!
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 17:47
No one is infringing upon your rights if we have background checks, get it?
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 17:50
No response from Donna, but check all the downvotes….ooohhh
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 18:07
She’s about to be banned for supporting Ms. Watts being called a “c*nt.”
I don’t know one Republican personally that would support this kind of talk.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:36
you’re not one for flashing money at Republicans are you?
Hirightnow December 27th, 2014 at 18:24
Wish us normal (Yes, I called myself “normal”) people could see those downvotes…:(
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:35
many lunatics from ages past considered themselves ‘normal’ – hell, I even heard a rumor years ago that Don Rickles use to have day dreams about being normal.
Hirightnow December 27th, 2014 at 18:44
That hockey puck? Gimme a break!
:)
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 18:51
I’d be offended if I was ever considered “normal” especially after seeing what passes as being normal really means.
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 18:59
Bwahaha. She just went thru and downvoted everyone else’s comment. Like we wouldn’t know who did it.
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 19:03
Not anymore. I applied her ban retroactively, thus magically disappearing her down votes. Neener!
cogitoergodavesum December 28th, 2014 at 15:07
A retroactive ban? Is that like Double Secret Probation?
Carla Akins December 28th, 2014 at 15:37
Kinda. It removes all the users comments and history from the thread.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:04
evidently not.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:06
no ones saying you can’t be a member of a well regulated militia. Just that you cannot be legally armed in an UNREGULATED militia. NO infringement there.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 18:07
Just wondering, was the cop killer in Las Vegas part of that ‘well regulated militia’, or the one in Pa.or the one in NY last week?
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 18:31
That just mean showing up with their guns and camo clothes more or less on time for a meeting these days. Well, unless you’re OCT Kory, then it’s a snappy hipster hat, too.
tiredoftea December 27th, 2014 at 18:32
Is not infringed, has never been infringed, get that?
Jason Costa December 27th, 2014 at 19:27
Well regulated meant well armed and trained. It has nothing to do with regulations on firearms themselves. There were NO regulations on firearms during those times.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 19:32
Well, they only fired one round, then had to be reloaded fairly slowly, they weren’t used by nuts to mow down dozens of people in a mall, school or theater. Sorry, the Framers didn’t know that guns would become weapons of mass death and the fetish objects of gun nuts in the future.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 19:38
Then I’ll pose the question to you…Just wondering, was the cop killer in Las Vegas part of that ‘well regulated militia’, or the one in Pa.or the one in NY last week?
A militia that is well regulated is one that has control of their members, not everyone can join and those that do are governed or REGULATED as to what they do, where they go and who they fight. It is not a group that comes and goes when they please and who they fight for and against.
Jason December 27th, 2014 at 22:07
Sorry I don’t control thug gang members, I thought you liberals were trying to handle those issues by waving rainbow flags and what not.
edmeyer_able December 27th, 2014 at 22:12
Why bother commenting when it has nothing to do with the question?
Charlie3 December 27th, 2014 at 21:08
The well regulated militia they had in mind when they wrote the 2nd amendment was for the sole purposes of preventing or putting down any slave revolutions.
KABoink_after_wingnut_hacker December 28th, 2014 at 08:21
That is exactly correct!
And gun nuts conveniently forget that part of our history.
tracey marie December 27th, 2014 at 16:19
gun nuts, they get disgusting when someone dares to say let’s talk about common sense solutions to all the gun deaths. Yet theses same nuts are all for voting restrictions.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:03
-and dictating the womb arrangement spaces of others.
tracey marie December 27th, 2014 at 17:19
gun nuts, they get disgusting when someone dares to say let’s talk about common sense solutions to all the gun deaths. Yet theses same nuts are all for voting restrictions.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:03
-and dictating the womb arrangement spaces of others.
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 16:56
Taste of her own medicine? Really? Do you have screen shots of her tweets calling people nasty names, threatening people? I’ll wait right here while you go get them.
william reed December 27th, 2014 at 18:30
Actually, there are hashtags dedicated to just that.
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 18:39
Hashtags dedicated to finding Watt’s inappropriate tweets? Please, feel free to provide me with an example.
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 17:56
Taste of her own medicine? Really? Do you have screen shots of her tweets calling people nasty names, threatening people? I’ll wait right here while you go get them.
william reed December 27th, 2014 at 19:30
Actually, there are hashtags dedicated to just that.
Carla Akins December 27th, 2014 at 19:39
Hashtags dedicated to finding Watt’s inappropriate tweets? Please, feel free to provide me with an example.
Obewon December 27th, 2014 at 16:59
GOP’s National Racist misogynists Association are scared teeny weenies with no cattle.
Obewon December 27th, 2014 at 17:59
GOP’s National Racist misogynists Association are scared teeny weenies with no cattle.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 17:01
to those IDIOT NAZIS who tempt US with the come and take them if you can-
OK.
– stay ready, ’cause spring storms are on the way.
granpa.usthai December 27th, 2014 at 18:01
to those IDIOT NAZIS who tempt US with the come and take them if you can-
OK.
– stay ready, ’cause spring storms are on the way.
Obewon December 27th, 2014 at 17:05
I’m guessing you have no idea ‘U.S. gun owners shoot 22-43 more friends & family than any intruder.’-FBI/CDC. And Darwinism is why U.S. gun owner households plummeted from 1970’s 50% to 30% in 2008. The 30% of U.S. Gun owner households commit 2/3 of all American Homicides. Gun nuts are killers.
william reed December 27th, 2014 at 18:30
Care to cite this? Because, thats clearly not true. There are approximately 150 million gun owners in this country. You’re talking LIKELIHOOD-thats like you’re 10x more likely to drown in a pool-if you have a pool. Right? Does that mean you WILL drown in a pool? Spinning numbers is for idiots. Sorry.
Red Mann December 27th, 2014 at 18:36
Those “numbers” represent actual dead people, people who died unnecessarily, leaving behind grieving family and friends, widows, widowers and orphans.
Obewon December 27th, 2014 at 19:59
You’ve got zip. 1/3 of USA’s households own guns today, but in-fact do commit 2/3+ of all U.S. homicides. That’s why 2/3 of American households aren’t gun owners, or paranoids to dim and afraid to call 911. Share of Homes With Guns 34% in 2012, Shows 4-Decade Decline from 1970’s 49%. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/us/rate-of-gun-ownership-is-down-survey-shows.html?pagewanted=all
Gun Deaths Every year in the U.S., an average of more than 100,000 people are shot.
Every day in the U.S., an average of 289 people are shot. Eighty-six of them die: 30 are murdered, 53 kill themselves, two die accidentally, and one is shot in a police intervention, the Brady Campaign reports. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/16/16547690-just-the-facts-gun-violence-in-america?lite White guys remain the most likely to shoot themselves.
Homicides by weapon:
Handguns comprised 72.5% of the firearms used in murder and non-negligent manslaughter incidents in 2011; 4.1% were with shotguns; 3.8% were with rifles; 18.5% were with unspecified firearms. 13.3% of homicides were done with knives or other cutting instruments. 5.8% of homicides were from the use of hands, fists, feet, etc. (source: FBI)
Anomaly 100 December 27th, 2014 at 17:05
Cite your source or go. Your choice. You’re a female and you support these people calling her a “c*nt”.
Just nasty.