3-Year-Old Fatally Shot In The Head, Because Tuesday
Authorities say a 3-year-old boy is dead after suffering a gunshot would to the head in a Simpsonville, South Carolina home. At this point, police have not confirmed whether the shooting was an accident or not.
The AP reports that Investigators say they have the handgun believed to be used in the shooting and they are not searching for a suspect.
Deputy Coroner Kent Dill said that it appears the child was shot in the head.
No charges have been filed and police are continuing their investigation.
According to authorities, the father died from cancer earlier this year.
Watch:
H/T: @ComgenKDT with thanks.
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100
56 responses to 3-Year-Old Fatally Shot In The Head, Because Tuesday
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
anothertoothpick December 16th, 2014 at 09:45
Another responsible gun owner?
crc3 December 16th, 2014 at 11:30
Hardly…
Carla Akins December 16th, 2014 at 12:37
At least one with 2nd amendment rights. Merica!
anothertoothpick December 16th, 2014 at 10:45
Another responsible gun owner?
crc3 December 16th, 2014 at 12:30
Hardly…
Carla Akins December 16th, 2014 at 13:37
At least one with 2nd amendment rights. Merica!
MIAtheistGal December 16th, 2014 at 09:57
When does it end? When do we say enough is enough? How many babies need to be shot and killed? How many more?
I just feel like screaming!
crc3 December 16th, 2014 at 11:30
It will never end if parents don’t do their jobs and lock their guns up and away from their children. Parents should also be held accountable for not properly parenting like in this case…
Carla Akins December 16th, 2014 at 12:40
We need to find a polarizing figure, like Candy Lightner that started MADD. Personally I’m not against gun ownership, but I do feel it needs to be responsible ownership – and I think you should have to prove it. I have to seriously question those gun owners that get their panties in such a wad over the “proving” part of it.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 12:44
Welllll, when your “Big Girl Panties” are this big !!!! Wadding becomes an issue.
Carla Akins December 17th, 2014 at 04:57
When I buy them in packs of 12, the UPS guy bitches about having to deliver the damn heavy box too.
Pistol-Packing December 17th, 2014 at 16:36
Hope you at least get a discount.
Carla Akins December 18th, 2014 at 04:49
Hells no. they charge you a premium for the size!
MIAtheistGal December 16th, 2014 at 13:32
I have no problem with responsible gun owners, either. Locking up your weapons and the ammunition is part of that. I cringe when I see open carry pictures and they’re doing so many wrong things with their guns, things that would prompt my dad to take someone’s gun away until they were resposibke enough to handle it. He did that more than once at deer camp, pissing a few guys off but safety is more important than hurt feelings.
Carla Akins December 17th, 2014 at 04:52
This ^^.
MIAtheistGal December 16th, 2014 at 10:57
When does it end? When do we say enough is enough? How many babies need to be shot and killed? How many more?
I just feel like screaming!
crc3 December 16th, 2014 at 12:30
It will never end if parents don’t do their jobs and lock their guns up and away from their children. Parents should also be held accountable for not properly parenting like in this case…
Carla Akins December 16th, 2014 at 13:40
We need to find a polarizing figure, like Candy Lightner that started MADD. Personally I’m not against gun ownership, but I do feel it needs to be responsible ownership – and I think you should have to prove it. I have to seriously question those gun owners that get their panties in such a wad over the “proving” part of it.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 13:44
Welllll, when your “Big Girl Panties” are this big !!!! Wadding becomes an issue.
Carla Akins December 17th, 2014 at 05:57
When I buy them in packs of 12, the UPS guy bitches about having to deliver the damn heavy box too.
Pistol-Packing December 17th, 2014 at 17:36
Hope you at least get a discount.
Carla Akins December 18th, 2014 at 05:49
Hells no. they charge you a premium for the size!
MIAtheistGal December 16th, 2014 at 14:32
I have no problem with responsible gun owners, either. Locking up your weapons and the ammunition is part of that. I cringe when I see open carry pictures and they’re doing so many wrong things with their guns, things that would prompt my dad to take someone’s gun away until they were resposibke enough to handle it. He did that more than once at deer camp, pissing a few guys off but safety is more important than hurt feelings.
Carla Akins December 17th, 2014 at 05:52
This ^^.
Larry Schmitt December 16th, 2014 at 11:25
I have a question for the NRA. How many children are “accidentally” killed by other methods in homes that don’t have firearms? How does this number compare with the number of children who are shot? And remember, guns don’t kill.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 12:49
It is avery interesting read if you actually care to.
http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2013/09/29/how_common_are_child_gun_accidents_666.html
Bunya December 16th, 2014 at 13:35
Motor vehicles are designed to get someone from one place to another.
Firearms are designed to kill, period.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 14:06
but you are failing to recognize drowning, which outnumbers them all (Except motor vehicles) as well as fire, suffocation, pedestrian, posion, land transport, natural environment, striking…
whatthe46 December 16th, 2014 at 14:21
often NOT preventable. this death WAS!
anothertoothpick December 16th, 2014 at 15:16
Ahhh yes, the never ending right wing nut job politics of changing the subject.
We are talking about guns here.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 16:35
my post was in response to this comment. so NO, it was not changing the subject or deflecting.
I have a question for the NRA. How many children are “accidentally” killed by other methods in homes that don’t have firearms? How does this number compare with the number of children who are shot? And remember, guns don’t kill.
Jones December 16th, 2014 at 19:12
“For kids ages 5 to 14, the mortality rate is 14 times higher (from gun accidents) in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states. For infants and toddlers, ages 0 to 4, the mortality rate is 17 times higher in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states.”
A few extra dead children is a small price to pay for unrestricted gun ownership, right?
rg9rts December 17th, 2014 at 04:27
One death is one too many no matter how pretty a picture the NRA paints
Larry Schmitt December 16th, 2014 at 12:25
I have a question for the NRA. How many children are “accidentally” killed by other methods in homes that don’t have firearms? How does this number compare with the number of children who are shot? And remember, guns don’t kill.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 13:49
It is avery interesting read if you actually care to.
http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2013/09/29/how_common_are_child_gun_accidents_666.html
Bunya December 16th, 2014 at 14:35
Motor vehicles are designed to get someone from one place to another.
Firearms are designed to kill, period.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 15:06
but you are failing to recognize drowning, which outnumbers them all (Except motor vehicles) as well as fire, suffocation, pedestrian, posion, land transport, natural environment, striking…
whatthe46 December 16th, 2014 at 15:21
often NOT preventable. this death WAS!
anothertoothpick December 16th, 2014 at 16:16
Ahhh yes, the never ending right wing nut job politics of changing the subject.
We are talking about guns here.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 17:35
my post was in response to this comment. so NO, it was not changing the subject or deflecting.
I have a question for the NRA. How many children are “accidentally” killed by other methods in homes that don’t have firearms? How does this number compare with the number of children who are shot? And remember, guns don’t kill.
Jones December 16th, 2014 at 20:12
“For kids ages 5 to 14, the mortality rate is 14 times higher (from gun accidents) in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states. For infants and toddlers, ages 0 to 4, the mortality rate is 17 times higher in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states.”
A few extra dead children is a small price to pay for unrestricted gun ownership, right?
rg9rts December 17th, 2014 at 05:27
One death is one too many no matter how pretty a picture the NRA paints
crc3 December 16th, 2014 at 11:27
When guns are kept out (not locked up) and children are around it equates to a potential tragedy. This looks like yet another case of bad parenting where the parent(s) failed to do their jobs and protect their kids…
crc3 December 16th, 2014 at 12:27
When guns are kept out (not locked up) and children are around it equates to a potential tragedy. This looks like yet another case of bad parenting where the parent(s) failed to do their jobs and protect their kids…
anothertoothpick December 16th, 2014 at 12:48
There are no responsible gun owners, only lucky ones.
Keeping a gun in your house is like keeping high explosives in your garage. It doesn’t matter how careful you are, all it takes is one unlucky slip-up to bring tragedy to your family or your neighbors. No matter how many precautions you take, you’re still creating a dangerous situation for the entire community by your actions. Keeping guns in your house is an inherently irresponsible thing to do.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 12:58
No it not….. SMH
whatthe46 December 16th, 2014 at 13:13
i’m sure this mother now thinks otherwise, as well as this great-grandmother: “MEMPHIS, TN (WMC) – A four-year-old was taken to Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital in non-critical condition after a 6-year-old shot her Sunday night, according to Memphis Police Department.” this 4yr old was shot in the face.
Jake December 16th, 2014 at 14:14
This is a complete load of crap. There is no logic to this what so ever. Responsibly stored firearms pose no threat to anyone. How is a gun, locked in safe going to kill a kid? In addition (and I’m sure you won’t agree), gun ownership deters crime and allows for self defense, thereby offering greater safety in said responsible gun owners house. I 100% guarantee this gun was not properly stored (probably stored loaded, within reach of the child, not locked up). Furthermore, this is illegal, whether charges are filed or not, they should be, this is criminal negligence. However, a properly secured firearm is not the least bit negligent.
jasperjava December 16th, 2014 at 19:05
I completely agree. Guns simply do not belong in the hands of untrained irresponsible citizens. The Second Amendment’s purpose was to set up citizen-militias. Anyone who wishes to own a firearm should have to sign a contract that they can be conscripted at a moment’s notice. They should have to undergo basic training, with refreshers every second year. They should be subject to rigorous psychological evaluations periodically. Extremists of all types would be banned, especially violent racist right-wingers.
They should have to undergo firearm safety and operation training. There should be heavy taxes on guns and ammunition, to discourage casual owners from purchasing deadly weapons they are not prepared to learn to use properly.
There are simply too many idiots who own guns. It’s an issue of public safety.
anothertoothpick December 16th, 2014 at 13:48
There are no responsible gun owners, only lucky ones.
Keeping a gun in your house is like keeping high explosives in your garage. It doesn’t matter how careful you are, all it takes is one unlucky slip-up to bring tragedy to your family or your neighbors. No matter how many precautions you take, you’re still creating a dangerous situation for the entire community by your actions. Keeping guns in your house is an inherently irresponsible thing to do.
Pistol-Packing December 16th, 2014 at 13:58
No it not….. SMH
whatthe46 December 16th, 2014 at 14:13
i’m sure this mother now thinks otherwise, as well as this great-grandmother: “MEMPHIS, TN (WMC) – A four-year-old was taken to Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital in non-critical condition after a 6-year-old shot her Sunday night, according to Memphis Police Department.” this 4yr old was shot in the face.
Jake December 16th, 2014 at 15:14
This is a complete load of crap. There is no logic to this what so ever. Responsibly stored firearms pose no threat to anyone. How is a gun, locked in safe going to kill a kid? In addition (and I’m sure you won’t agree), gun ownership deters crime and allows for self defense, thereby offering greater safety in said responsible gun owners house. I 100% guarantee this gun was not properly stored (probably stored loaded, within reach of the child, not locked up). Furthermore, this is illegal, whether charges are filed or not, they should be, this is criminal negligence. However, a properly secured firearm is not the least bit negligent.
jasperjava December 16th, 2014 at 20:05
I completely agree. Guns simply do not belong in the hands of untrained irresponsible citizens. The Second Amendment’s purpose was to set up citizen-militias. Anyone who wishes to own a firearm should have to sign a contract that they can be conscripted at a moment’s notice. They should have to undergo basic training, with refreshers every second year. They should be subject to rigorous psychological evaluations periodically. Extremists of all types would be banned, especially violent racist right-wingers.
They should have to undergo firearm safety and operation training. There should be heavy taxes on guns and ammunition, to discourage casual owners from purchasing deadly weapons they are not prepared to learn to use properly.
There are simply too many idiots who own guns. It’s an issue of public safety.
rg9rts December 17th, 2014 at 04:25
Last month we had 3 year old contestant in the NRA Shooter of the month award….Way to go people
rg9rts December 17th, 2014 at 05:25
Last month we had 3 year old contestant in the NRA Shooter of the month award….Way to go people