Audio: KKK Is Very Upset Anonymous Revealed Their Names, ‘The Klan Is Watching You’
The KKK is mad after Anonymous retaliated in a big way by taking their hoods off and exposing them for the world to see. My pal Tiffany Willis posted the story on Liberal America, after we posted it here and it’s getting a lot of attention.
You see, the Klan wants to provoke violence against the protesters in Ferguson and Anonymous is having none of that.
Tiff taped the call and uploaded it to YouTube.
“This message is for Tiffany,” the man’s voice can be heard saying. “The Klan is watching you.”
“We don’t like what we’re seeing.”
The voice on the phone says, “You need to stop this immediately.”
Watch:
Is Tiffany worried? Of course not. She told me that she’s “not nervous but will follow the proper channels and report it to the FBI and police.”
Why didn’t they call me since the story originated here? Because there aren’t any Anomaly100s in the phone book, hello! But if they want my address, it’s: 123 Main Street, Any Town, Anyplace, USA! USA!
Keep it up Anonymous. The Klan is getting antsy because you’ve ruffled their pointy little hoods.
Use the #OpKKK and #HoodsOff hashtags and also show Tiffany some love here. You can follow Tiff on Twitter here.
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100
Eric Mc Cullough November 17th, 2014 at 17:59
Ok compare that to over 5.2 million. We are good!
Scott Sellers November 17th, 2014 at 19:36
Let’s see em show up to ferguson…
voldkoff November 17th, 2014 at 21:14
yep, that way we can watch both spectrums of racist duke it out!
Jordan Weimer November 17th, 2014 at 22:00
Dude, get fucked. Communism isn’t going to take over if we stop racism in the police force in Ferguson. You talk about “both spectrum of racists” as though that’s a thing. It’s the classic racist calling people who fight against racism racist. It’s the “I’m rubber, you’re glue” defense. Seriously, get fucked. You’re racist. We’re all racist. It’s not that you’re racist that matters, it’s that you do something to minimize the effect of it on other people. That’s what matters. If you’re against what you call “Pink- Stalinist” protestors, you’re on the side that is perpetuating racism. You deal with that, but don’t act like your stance is some how as equally virtuous as the people protesting this crap.
voldkoff November 17th, 2014 at 23:38
@jordanweimer:disqus Jordan, your display of servitude escapes you there comrade. I do apologize for the lack of political sensitivity by referring to you as a “Pinko -Stalinsist”…If I’m not mistaking you academia types prefer “Trotsky Sympathizer”, since it theory based, right their comrade? The only side that is perpetuating racism,looting and violence is the ferguson pinko’s. regardless what they programmed you to believe the end never justifies the means.
voldkoff November 17th, 2014 at 23:40
The irony of this, is that I don’t support the tactics.
Jordan Weimer November 18th, 2014 at 00:50
Listen, I told you to get fucked from the bottom of my heart. I really believe you should get fucked. I could have said nothing to you, and most people would probably agree that’s the best thing to do when talking to a person on the internet. But, here’s the thing, I know you’re a person and I profoundly want there to be fewer people who post comments like the one you posted. And, the only way to do that is to write to you. I want you to know that your argument is ridiculous and needs to get fucked. I use harsh words because it’s good to take a strong stance on bullshit arguments. And, I aimed it at you because, well, you are the owner of that doozie of an argument and you need to know it’s ridiculous and abhorrent. And, most importantly, I aimed it at you because I know that being misinformed is a simple enough condition to solve, if a person is ready to accept new ideas. I aimed it at you because I have faith that ideas can travel between people because we’re all equally intelligent. We just have different education contexts. Your context seems to have taught you that liberals are communists, and while some of them are, that is a misconception. I am liberal and very proud to say that Communism was a terrible system of government and our Republican Democracy was vastly superior to any country in the twentieth century. Now the twenty first century there are some countries that might be better to live in from an economic stand point, but the US is my home and I’d rather live no place else. I might not have enough nationalistic pride for some conservatives, but I’m an American that likes capitalism and my country. What I don’t like is that in places like Ferguson racism still exists on an institutional level. And, I don’t like when I find people minimizing the arguments of the protesters and attacking the idea that racism needs to end by calling the virtuous racists. I’ve seen this happen again and again in comment sections and it’s epidemic. In your case, you talked about “both spectrum of racism” and also called the protesters “pinko Stalanists” or “Trotsky sympthizers”, and in so doing you cast stones at the protesters. You attacked them as people by framing what they stood for as racist and communist. And, that’s something these people should not be called. They are not communists and even if some of them are that’s irrelevant and doesn’t mean that if you side with them on this issue that you have become a communist. And, They may be racist. As I said before, we are all racist. But, that doesn’t matter when they’re doing something to end our natural racist biases influencing the way institutions are run in Ferguson. Anyway, I sincerely hope that helps you understand why I told you to get fucked. And, if it’s any consolation, get fucked when interpreted literally isn’t such a bad thing. Get fucked.
MartinK November 18th, 2014 at 03:14
By “academia types” do you mean “people smarter than myself?”
allison1050 November 18th, 2014 at 08:52
If you have to ask (I want to hope in jest) then yes.
tracey marie November 18th, 2014 at 07:48
I do like your style
allison1050 November 18th, 2014 at 08:51
Welcome to Disqus Jordan!
voldkoff November 18th, 2014 at 18:36
Jordan, What about justice for Dillion Taylor, the unarmed kid who was shot by a cop a few days after mike brown was shot? both equally as tragic. does one deserve justice and not the other. both of them shot by cops and both were unarmed. as matter of fact Dillion Taylor had his back turned to the cop the whole time. or does it not fit your narrative because Dillion was a white and the cop was black? not accusing you of anything just asking? or maybe you never even heard about it . and if you haven’t why not??
your previously profanity laced, diatribe of statements didn’t win you any logic points.
point A) yes the national communist party is here stirring up the hornets nest. .inclusive of other malcontent mobs. (kkkblack panthers)
Point B) the officer didn’t not shoot MB because of his shade of pigment.
Point C). I do agree what anonymous did to the kkk. and it was spot on. however, they should also be as vigilant with the black panthers assuming its not selective stances of racism to fit a particular narrative. which is quite evident in the corporate media arena these days. being in st.louis im previewed to some tidbits that maybe you outsiders are not receiving through your state sponsored propaganda via: nbc, abc, cbs, cnn, huffington post and so forth. the masses have failed to see they have all been misled. when all this hit the fan originally it was about police brutality and the militarization and creeping federalization of the police force. than the media and communistprogressives (choose your label) hi jacked the message of the people and interjected racism where their was none to begin with. the politicians want us to be divided and fight amongst ourselves. my very original point was that it would be entertaining of both sides of the racist would wipe each other out. meaning the kkk and black panthers.
Phil J Malloy November 19th, 2014 at 12:30
well said. in that case we have a black cop shooting a white unarmed kid, which never makes the papers
vancall November 20th, 2014 at 01:06
I think the whole point is about gun happy, angry, violent police. Although the white cops seem to be especially focused on brutality against blacks, too many cops of all stripe are getting by with brutality against citizens of all colors. They are getting out of hand and until WE ALL stand together and call for some justice it will only get worse.
voldkoff November 20th, 2014 at 12:03
spot on van, 2 quick questions here, of which their are no right answers.. just looking for perspective.
1) how did the local police forces across the USA, become to be what they are now? their have always been bad apples but as a whole, they weren’t like this when I was a kid that’s for sure.
2) what would satisfactory justice look like?
Anomaly 100 November 18th, 2014 at 19:56
That was awesome.
slavicdiva November 18th, 2014 at 07:30
Pinko-Stalinist? Seriously?
Dude, the 1950’s called. They want their outdated language back. What’s next, 23-skidoo?
tracey marie November 18th, 2014 at 07:46
that was hilarious
RK Johnston November 18th, 2014 at 13:27
The Bee’s Knees? (“Bea’s Knees” is actually the song played at the start of every James Bond flick, btw)
We’re The Berries?
The Cat’s Pajamas?
Cheesit?
Oh, the fun you can have with anachronistic terms, hmm? :-)
–RKJ
voldkoff November 18th, 2014 at 18:12
You hipsters are so suave debonair, perhaps pinko is a little antiquated. Perhaps, the label “progressive” is more fitting? however, in practice they both achieve the same outcome.
slavicdiva November 18th, 2014 at 19:05
I’m even more amused that you think I’m a “hipster.” Too funny!
Anomaly 100 November 18th, 2014 at 19:55
Laughing!
Scott Sellers November 17th, 2014 at 20:36
Let’s see em show up to ferguson…
Jordan Weimer November 17th, 2014 at 23:00
Dude, get fucked. Communism isn’t going to take over if we stop racism in the police force in Ferguson. You talk about “both spectrum of racists” as though that’s a thing. It’s the classic racist calling people who fight against racism racist. It’s the “I’m rubber, you’re glue” defense. Seriously, get fucked. You’re racist. We’re all racist. It’s not that you’re racist that matters, it’s that you do something to minimize the effect of it on other people. That’s what matters. If you’re against what you call “Pink- Stalinist” protestors, you’re on the side that is perpetuating racism. You deal with that, but don’t act like your stance is some how as equally virtuous as the people protesting this crap.
slavicdiva November 18th, 2014 at 08:30
Pinko-Stalinist? Seriously?
Dude, the 1950’s called. They want their outdated language back. What’s next, 23-skidoo?
tracey marie November 18th, 2014 at 08:46
that was hilarious
RK Johnston November 18th, 2014 at 14:27
The Bee’s Knees? (“Bea’s Knees” is actually the song played at the start of every James Bond flick, btw)
We’re The Berries?
The Cat’s Pajamas?
Cheesit?
Oh, the fun you can have with anachronistic terms, hmm? :-)
–RKJ
voldkoff November 18th, 2014 at 19:12
You hipsters are so suave debonair, perhaps pinko is a little antiquated. Perhaps, the label “progressive” is more fitting? however, in practice they both achieve the same outcome.
slavicdiva November 18th, 2014 at 20:05
I’m even more amused that you think I’m a “hipster.” Too funny!
Anomaly 100 November 18th, 2014 at 20:55
Laughing!
Dorothy Nadeau November 17th, 2014 at 21:45
The KKK is very much active & has never been inactive since it’s founding in 1865, if you truly believe what you say it seems your head is buried in the sand in order to avoid some evil truths! & FYI the KKK consists 100% of RADICAL EXTREMIST RIGHT WINGERS!!!
Steven Sigmon November 18th, 2014 at 13:02
false KKK are all Democrats. I thought everybody knew that.
mea_mark November 18th, 2014 at 13:08
I don’t know what to say without being mean and insulting, so I will just say goodbye and don’t comeback.
Guest November 18th, 2014 at 14:17
The KKK were democrats until LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act. Then they became Republicans for what we can assume was a totally random reason.
MartinK November 17th, 2014 at 23:17
Not very intimidating when they end with “PLEASE… stop this.”
MartinK November 18th, 2014 at 00:17
Not very intimidating when they end with “PLEASE… stop this.”
voldkoff November 18th, 2014 at 00:40
The irony of this, is that I don’t support the tactics.
Jordan Weimer November 18th, 2014 at 01:50
Listen, I told you to get fucked from the bottom of my heart. I really believe you should get fucked. I could have said nothing to you, and most people would probably agree that’s the best thing to do when talking to a person on the internet. But, here’s the thing, I know you’re a person and I profoundly want there to be fewer people who post comments like the one you posted. And, the only way to do that is to write to you. I want you to know that your argument is ridiculous and needs to get fucked. I use harsh words because it’s good to take a strong stance on bullshit arguments. And, I aimed it at you because, well, you are the owner of that doozie of an argument and you need to know it’s ridiculous and abhorrent. And, most importantly, I aimed it at you because I know that being misinformed is a simple enough condition to solve, if a person is ready to accept new ideas. I aimed it at you because I have faith that ideas can travel between people because we’re all equally intelligent. We just have different education contexts. Your context seems to have taught you that liberals are communists, and while some of them are, that is a misconception. I am liberal and very proud to say that Communism was a terrible system of government and our Republican Democracy was vastly superior to any country in the twentieth century. Now the twenty first century there are some countries that might be better to live in from an economic stand point, but the US is my home and I’d rather live no place else. I might not have enough nationalistic pride for some conservatives, but I’m an American that likes capitalism and my country. What I don’t like is that in places like Ferguson racism still exists on an institutional level. And, I don’t like when I find people minimizing the arguments of the protesters and attacking the idea that racism needs to end by calling the virtuous racists. I’ve seen this happen again and again in comment sections and it’s epidemic. In your case, you talked about “both spectrum of racism” and also called the protesters “pinko Stalanists” or “Trotsky sympthizers”, and in so doing you cast stones at the protesters. You attacked them as people by framing what they stood for as racist and communist. And, that’s something these people should not be called. They are not communists and even if some of them are that’s irrelevant and doesn’t mean that if you side with them on this issue that you have become a communist. And, They may be racist. As I said before, we are all racist. But, that doesn’t matter when they’re doing something to end our natural racist biases influencing the way institutions are run in Ferguson. Anyway, I sincerely hope that helps you understand why I told you to get fucked. And, if it’s any consolation, get fucked when interpreted literally isn’t such a bad thing. Get fucked.
MartinK November 18th, 2014 at 04:14
By “academia types” do you mean “people smarter than myself?”
allison1050 November 18th, 2014 at 09:52
If you have to ask (I perfer to hope in jest) then yes.
tracey marie November 18th, 2014 at 08:48
I do like your style
allison1050 November 18th, 2014 at 09:51
Welcome to Disqus Jordan!
voldkoff November 18th, 2014 at 19:36
Jordan, What about justice for Dillion Taylor, the unarmed kid who was shot by a cop a few days after mike brown was shot? both equally as tragic. does one deserve justice and not the other. both of them shot by cops and both were unarmed. as matter of fact Dillion Taylor had his back turned to the cop the whole time. or does it not fit your narrative because Dillion was a white and the cop was black? not accusing you of anything just asking? or maybe you never even heard about it . and if you haven’t why not??
your previously profanity laced, diatribe of statements didn’t win you any logic points.
point A) yes the national communist party is here stirring up the hornets nest. .inclusive of other malcontent mobs. (kkkblack panthers)
Point B) the officer didn’t not shoot MB because of his shade of pigment.
Point C). I do agree what anonymous did to the kkk. and it was spot on. however, they should also be as vigilant with the black panthers assuming its not selective stances of racism to fit a particular narrative. which is quite evident in the corporate media arena these days. being in st.louis im previewed to some tidbits that maybe you outsiders are not receiving through your state sponsored propaganda via: nbc, abc, cbs, cnn, huffington post and so forth. the masses have failed to see they have all been misled. when all this hit the fan originally it was about police brutality and the militarization and creeping federalization of the police force. than the media and communistprogressives (choose your label) hi jacked the message of the people and interjected racism where their was none to begin with. the politicians want us to be divided and fight amongst ourselves. my very original point was that it would be entertaining of both sides of the racist would wipe each other out. meaning the kkk and black panthers.
Guest November 18th, 2014 at 22:26
No it wouldn’t be entertaining if there was a horrible massacre you deluded psycho. Fuck “get fucked”. Get help.
voldkoff November 19th, 2014 at 14:30
what do you call a failed comedian who resorts to name calling because the facts don’t fit his ideology…hmm
Guest November 19th, 2014 at 16:54
Haha. Don’t you know that comedian and failure are synonymous… that means both words have the same meaning.
Phil J Malloy November 19th, 2014 at 13:30
well said. in that case we have a black cop shooting a white unarmed kid, which never makes the papers
vancall November 20th, 2014 at 02:06
I think the whole point is about gun happy, angry, violent police. Although the white cops seem to be especially focused on brutality against blacks, too many cops of all stripe are getting by with brutality against citizens of all colors. They are getting out of hand and until WE ALL stand together and call for some justice it will only get worse.
voldkoff November 20th, 2014 at 13:03
spot on van, 2 quick questions here, of which their are no right answers.. just looking for perspective.
1) how did the local police forces across the USA, become to be what they are now? their have always been bad apples but as a whole, they weren’t like this when I was a kid that’s for sure.
2) what would satisfactory justice look like?
Anomaly 100 November 18th, 2014 at 20:56
That was awesome.
jericho November 18th, 2014 at 10:56
I hope Tiffany is armed.
colleen2 November 19th, 2014 at 15:12
Most of us are not the cowardly, vicious racists who vote Republican. We don’t look for a gun to suck on when we are threatened by scum.
jericho November 19th, 2014 at 15:14
Excuse me? I’d rather be armed and not need it than need it and not have it. Especially if I went up against KKK asswipes.
jericho November 18th, 2014 at 11:56
I hope Tiffany is armed.
colleen2 November 19th, 2014 at 16:12
Most of us are not the cowardly, vicious racists who vote Republican. We don’t look for a gun to suck on when we are threatened by scum.
jericho November 19th, 2014 at 16:14
Excuse me? I’d rather be armed and not need it than need it and not have it. Especially if I went up against KKK asswipes.
cvryder2000 November 18th, 2014 at 11:17
Oooooh, I’m sure Anonymous is just shaking in their boots. NOT.
cvryder2000 November 18th, 2014 at 12:17
Oooooh, I’m sure Anonymous is just shaking in their boots. NOT.
Steven Sigmon November 18th, 2014 at 11:59
The good part about all this is that it will finally reveal that the KKK are Democrats. Nice work Anon!
arc99 November 18th, 2014 at 12:20
True 100 years ago in 1914, most of the KKK were registered Democrats.
Anyone who thinks the same is true in 2014 is an idiot.
Max T. Furr November 18th, 2014 at 14:04
It isn’t about Democrats and Republicans. It’s about conservatives and liberals/progressives.
You are correct in that 100 years ago members of the KKK were Democrats, but the Democratic Party, especially in the South, was CONSERVATIVE (Southern Democrats = Dixiecrats).
After the Civil Rights Acts, many of them left the Democratic Party, formed their own party, but then defected to the Republican party to join the neoconservatives who had been schooled in Leo Strauss’ political philosophy that advances a Machiavellian “ends justifies the means,” a Nietzschean “the will to power should be our primary motivating force,” and Ayn Rand’s Objectivism that says one’s actions are rational only when one’s self-interest benefits over the interests of others.
Virtually the entire Republican Party, as well as the Tea Party, are conservatives. The Democratic Party has moderate conservatives, liberals, and progressives. The liberals and the progressives cannot be, and have never been, found in the ranks of the KKK.
Phil J Malloy November 19th, 2014 at 12:28
you are leaving out the libertarians which sadly are forced to vote with the Rs, they are in no way related to the KKK
on the other hand, the democrats had a klan leader as a senator until his death a few years ago (robert byrd)
long story short, there are racists all over the spectrum, and of all different nationalities
Max T. Furr November 19th, 2014 at 12:51
Byrd apologized for his past. He changed his attitude rather than defect and keep his racism. And, besides that, Byrd was never a liberal or progressive, he was a conservative all the way.
As I said, “It isn’t about Democrats and Republicans. It’s about conservatives and liberals/progressives.”
You are correct that I did not mention libertarians, who possess some liberal views. I was speaking only of Liberals/progressives and conservatives. Libertarians are often a mixture of both.
And, I am well aware of racists in other countries/cultures, but that is not what this blog is about.
Phil J Malloy November 19th, 2014 at 13:58
So he apologized publicly I doubt he changed his beliefs, once a racist always a racist
I was referring to america as well when I said of all different nationalities.
al sharpton for example is a black racist
alex jones seems to be a racist against jews and blacks
There are others but those 2 stand out to me right about now
Max T. Furr November 19th, 2014 at 15:01
“once a racist always a racist”
False. I was raised to be a fundamentalist Christian and a racist. I evolved while in college, seeing that blacks wanted essentially what all other thinking Americans want, a living wage, financial security, and freedom under the Constitution.
I rejected not only racism, but religion as well, because I discovered that religion was not a uniting force, but a force for division–for exclusivity. The only value that can be rightfully called a uniting force is empathy.
I’m not sure where you get the idea that Al Sharpton is a racist, especially against blacks, but I do not know Alex Jones at all.
Regardless, I think that it is quite probable that the ranks of the KKK are made up of mostly conservative republicans. But, whatever they are, you will not find a liberal or a progressive in the KKK. By definition, they are open to diversity in society and in religion, and believe that given the same nurturing environment and education, blacks can excel on an even par with whites. The nurturing environment is the key.
jasperjava November 24th, 2014 at 03:10
In 2008 Robert Byrd enthusiastically endorsed a mixed-race Black man to be the next President of the United States.
You’re nothing but a one-track-mind bigot.
Phil J Malloy November 24th, 2014 at 08:02
lol. you dont realize that without the name calling, you actually would have had a point. but since you resort to name calling you just look like the one with the one track mind
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 08:28
Not true. the use of insults, profanity, satire, humor and venomous words do not, necessarily, invalidate a factual argument.
For instance, if I say, “The sun is yellow, asshole,” does that change the color of the sun? No.
Someone presented evidence to you that your argument was invalid. Instead of dealing with THAT, you focused on the insult and made that the problem with his argument.
YOU are the one avoiding the argument and you are also the one whose panties are in a bunch about being called a name.
You aren’t in school. This is not Debate 101. This is not done by the Marquis de Queensberry Rules.
Now, be willing to put up your Dukes and do something of substance or get the Hell out and leave the fight to the Big Dogs.
Carla Akins November 24th, 2014 at 09:31
Although technically your point is correct, here at Alan.com we prefer readers engage in a more civil discourse. Please do so, or you will not be welcome back.
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 09:46
You act as if I care what you think of what I said. I don’t. Your opinion, matters not. Ban me if you will, but know that it is YOU who are bending the rules and censoring free speech, not me.
I have not used profanity or bad words to insult anyone. I merely asked if the woman in question was thick, which, by her post is not an entirely unreasonable question to ask.
That is all I have done. So sue me. The French have a saying, “Faire d’une mouche, d’un elephant” which, literally translated, means, “To make of a flea an elephant,” and that is what you have done here.
Indeed, with your post, you imply that I have been less than civil, when, indeed, since I was the one initially attacked for the alleged crime of saying that Anonymous was Racist (which, indeed, I did NOT say) I have been entirely civil in my posts.
Usually, when someone says something like, “Technically, you are correct,” that means that they are saying, “In effect, even if you are correct, if we don’t like what you say, we are going to ban you.”
That’s something I’d expect from the Reichministry of Propaganda and Faux News, not from a Liberal leaning blog site.
So, ban me if you want. I don’t really care, Carla. There are plenty of other Liberal sites that aren’t so “sensitive” to forceful words that may border on the impolite, but never cross the line into uncivilized discourse. I have not called anyone names, merely posed a hypothetical situation.
If you or anyone else took it as such, well, I can’t help you.
Perhaps I am not the one who needs a thicker skin?
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 10:29
Oh, and by the way, how is it that, though I have not used profanity or said anything untrue, or engaged in character assassination, someone else on this blog has gotten away with using uncivil language and insulting behaviors, yet you single ME out for censure?
Methinks thou should look elsewhere in the comments to where the actual profanity is being used by certain people and that doesn’t include me.
Carla Akins November 24th, 2014 at 11:37
This is a private website, you have no “free speech”. You do have terms of service. I was simply trying to direct the conversation in a positive direction but hey – if you wish to be a douchebag, fine with me.
DesertSun59 November 20th, 2014 at 10:02
The Democratic Party has exactly one progressive/liberal. Her name is Elizabeth Warren.
One.
Exactly one.
99.999% of the Dem Party is right of center.
Max T. Furr November 20th, 2014 at 13:00
I tend to disagree. Certainly Warren is by far the most daring and outspoken (would make an excellent VP and eventually, President), but I would add Jim McDermott and John Conyers as well as Bernie Sanders, Elijah Commings, and a few others.
Ananon Locke November 19th, 2014 at 08:44
…
Steven Sigmon November 18th, 2014 at 12:59
The good part about all this is that it will finally reveal that the KKK are Democrats. Nice work Anon!
arc99 November 18th, 2014 at 13:20
True 100 years ago in 1914, most of the KKK were registered Democrats.
Anyone who thinks the same is true in 2014 is an idiot.
HobbesianWorld November 18th, 2014 at 15:04
It isn’t about Democrats and Republicans. It’s about conservatives and liberals/progressives.
You are correct in that 100 years ago members of the KKK were Democrats, but the Democratic Party, especially in the South, was CONSERVATIVE (Southern Democrats = Dixiecrats).
After the Civil Rights Acts, many of them left the Democratic Party, formed their own party, but then defected to the Republican party to join the neoconservatives who had been schooled in Leo Strauss’ political philosophy that advances a Machiavellian “ends justifies the means,” a Nietzschean “the will to power should be our primary motivating force,” and Ayn Rand’s Objectivism that says one’s actions are rational only when one’s self-interest benefits over the interests of others.
Virtually the entire Republican Party, as well as the Tea Party, are conservatives. The Democratic Party has moderate conservatives, liberals, and progressives. The liberals and the progressives cannot be, and have never been, found in the ranks of the KKK.
Phil J Malloy November 19th, 2014 at 13:28
you are leaving out the libertarians which sadly are forced to vote with the Rs, they are in no way related to the KKK
on the other hand, the democrats had a klan leader as a senator until his death a few years ago (robert byrd)
long story short, there are racists all over the spectrum, and of all different nationalities
HobbesianWorld November 19th, 2014 at 13:51
Byrd apologized for his past. He changed his attitude rather than defect and keep his racism. And, besides that, Byrd was never a liberal or progressive, he was a conservative all the way.
As I said, “It isn’t about Democrats and Republicans. It’s about conservatives and liberals/progressives.”
You are correct that I did not mention libertarians, who possess some liberal views. I was speaking only of Liberals/progressives and conservatives. Libertarians are often a mixture of both.
And, I am well aware of racists in other countries/cultures, but that is not what this blog is about.
Phil J Malloy November 19th, 2014 at 14:58
So he apologized publicly I doubt he changed his beliefs, once a racist always a racist
I was referring to america as well when I said of all different nationalities.
al sharpton for example is a black racist
alex jones seems to be a racist against jews and blacks
There are others but those 2 stand out to me right about now
HobbesianWorld November 19th, 2014 at 16:01
“once a racist always a racist”
False. I was raised to be a fundamentalist Christian and a racist. I evolved while in college, seeing that blacks wanted essentially what all other thinking Americans want, a living wage, financial security, and freedom under the Constitution.
I rejected not only racism, but religion as well, because I discovered that religion was not a uniting force, but a force for division–for exclusivity. The only value that can be rightfully called a uniting force is empathy.
I’m not sure where you get the idea that Al Sharpton is a racist, especially against blacks, but I do not know Alex Jones at all.
Regardless, I think that it is quite probable that the ranks of the KKK are made up of mostly conservative republicans. But, whatever they are, you will not find a liberal or a progressive in the KKK. By definition, they are open to diversity in society and in religion, and believe that given the same nurturing environment and education, blacks can excel on an even par with whites. The nurturing environment is the key.
jasperjava November 24th, 2014 at 04:10
In 2008 Robert Byrd enthusiastically endorsed a mixed-race Black man to be the next President of the United States.
You’re nothing but a one-track-mind bigot.
Phil J Malloy November 24th, 2014 at 09:02
lol. you dont realize that without the name calling, you actually would have had a point. but since you resort to name calling you just look like the one with the one track mind
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 09:28
Not true. the use of insults, profanity, satire, humor and venomous words do not, necessarily, invalidate a factual argument.
For instance, if I say, “The sun is yellow, asshole,” does that change the color of the sun? No.
Someone presented evidence to you that your argument was invalid. Instead of dealing with THAT, you focused on the insult and made that the problem with his argument.
YOU are the one avoiding the argument and you are also the one whose panties are in a bunch about being called a name.
You aren’t in school. This is not Debate 101. This is not done by the Marquis de Queensberry Rules.
Now, be willing to put up your Dukes and do something of substance or get the Hell out and leave the fight to the Big Dogs.
Carla Akins November 24th, 2014 at 10:31
Although technically your point is correct, here at Alan.com we prefer readers engage in a more civil discourse. Please do so, or you will not be welcome back.
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 10:46
You act as if I care what you think of what I said. I don’t. Your opinion, matters not. Ban me if you will, but know that it is YOU who are bending the rules and censoring free speech, not me.
I have not used profanity or bad words to insult anyone. I merely asked if the woman in question was thick, which, by her post is not an entirely unreasonable question to ask.
That is all I have done. So sue me. The French have a saying, “Faire d’une mouche, d’un elephant” which, literally translated, means, “To make of a flea an elephant,” and that is what you have done here.
Indeed, with your post, you imply that I have been less than civil, when, indeed, since I was the one initially attacked for the alleged crime of saying that Anonymous was Racist (which, indeed, I did NOT say) I have been entirely civil in my posts.
Usually, when someone says something like, “Technically, you are correct,” that means that they are saying, “In effect, even if you are correct, if we don’t like what you say, we are going to ban you.”
That’s something I’d expect from the Reichministry of Propaganda and Faux News, not from a Liberal leaning blog site.
So, ban me if you want. I don’t really care, Carla. There are plenty of other Liberal sites that aren’t so “sensitive” to forceful words that may border on the impolite, but never cross the line into uncivilized discourse. I have not called anyone names, merely posed a hypothetical situation.
If you or anyone else took it as such, well, I can’t help you.
Perhaps I am not the one who needs a thicker skin?
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 11:29
Oh, and by the way, how is it that, though I have not used profanity or said anything untrue, or engaged in character assassination, someone else on this blog has gotten away with using uncivil language and insulting behaviors, yet you single ME out for censure?
Methinks thou should look elsewhere in the comments to where the actual profanity is being used by certain people and that doesn’t include me.
Carla Akins November 24th, 2014 at 12:37
This is a private website, you have no “free speech”. You do have terms of service. I was simply trying to direct the conversation in a positive direction but hey – if you wish to be a douchebag, fine with me.
DesertSun59 November 20th, 2014 at 11:02
The Democratic Party has exactly one progressive/liberal. Her name is Elizabeth Warren.
One.
Exactly one.
99.999% of the Dem Party is right of center.
HobbesianWorld November 20th, 2014 at 14:00
I tend to disagree. Certainly Warren is by far the most daring and outspoken (would make an excellent VP and eventually, President), but I would add Jim McDermott and John Conyers as well as Bernie Sanders, Elijah Commings, and a few others.
Ananon Locke November 19th, 2014 at 09:44
…
RK Johnston November 18th, 2014 at 13:36
The fight is on, KKK…and it’s too late to back out now!
“We’ll beat you to submission,
so you might as well surrender!
You’re gonna learn your lesson,
‘cos there ain’t nobody here to defend…ya!”
–From “Delivering The Goods” by Judas Priest.
–RKJ
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 07:07
A much more appropo Judas Priest reference, considering it is Anonymous we are talking about here…
“Up here in space, I’m looking down on you
My lasers trace everything you do
You think you’ve private lives, think nothing of the kind
There is no true escape, I’m watching all the time
I’m made of metal, my circuits gleam
I am perpetual, I keep the country clean!
I’m electric, electric spy
I’m protective electric eye
Always in focus, you can’t feel my stare
I zoom into you, you don’t know I’m there
I take a pride in probing all your secret moves
My tearless retina takes pictures that can prove
I’m made of metal, my circuits gleam
I am perpetual, I keep the country clean
I’m electric, electric spy
I’m protective electric eye
Electric eye, in the sky
They feel the stare, so always there
There’s nothing you can do about it
Develop and expose, I feed upon your every thought
And so my power grows
I’m made of metal, my circuits gleam
I am perpetual, I keep the country clean
I’m electric, electric spy
I’m protecting electric eye
I’m electric, electric spy, I’m protecting
Protective, detective, Electric Eye”
RK Johnston November 24th, 2014 at 15:11
Love it!
–RKJ
RK Johnston November 18th, 2014 at 14:36
The fight is on, KKK…and it’s too late to back out now!
“We’ll beat you to submission,
so you might as well surrender!
You’re gonna learn your lesson,
‘cos there ain’t nobody here to defend…ya!”
–From “Delivering The Goods” by Judas Priest.
–RKJ
TheKaisho42 November 24th, 2014 at 08:07
A much more appropo Judas Priest reference, considering it is Anonymous we are talking about here…
“Up here in space, I’m looking down on you
My lasers trace everything you do
You think you’ve private lives, think nothing of the kind
There is no true escape, I’m watching all the time
I’m made of metal, my circuits gleam
I am perpetual, I keep the country clean!
I’m electric, electric spy
I’m protective electric eye
Always in focus, you can’t feel my stare
I zoom into you, you don’t know I’m there
I take a pride in probing all your secret moves
My tearless retina takes pictures that can prove
I’m made of metal, my circuits gleam
I am perpetual, I keep the country clean
I’m electric, electric spy
I’m protective electric eye
Electric eye, in the sky
They feel the stare, so always there
There’s nothing you can do about it
Develop and expose, I feed upon your every thought
And so my power grows
I’m made of metal, my circuits gleam
I am perpetual, I keep the country clean
I’m electric, electric spy
I’m protecting electric eye
I’m electric, electric spy, I’m protecting
Protective, detective, Electric Eye”
RK Johnston November 24th, 2014 at 16:11
Love it!
–RKJ
Jason Waite November 18th, 2014 at 14:47
Not very spookie, but makes for a fun day. #AnonFamily
Jason Kuklinski November 20th, 2014 at 09:07
http://pastebin.com/dEhGJtJU
ALL KKK DOX’s,SSN and credit cards,addresses,family members, phone numbers
Jason Waite November 18th, 2014 at 15:47
Not very spookie, but makes for a fun day. #AnonFamily
Jason Kuklinski November 20th, 2014 at 10:07
http://pastebin.com/dEhGJtJU
ALL KKK DOX’s,SSN and credit cards,addresses,family members, phone numbers
Dunzie November 18th, 2014 at 14:56
Provoking violence? They said that if they loot or steal or burn establishments like these thugs have done in the past, they will be met with force this time. I don’t see the problem here.
Anomaly 100 November 18th, 2014 at 19:53
You don’t see a problem with the Klan policing a predominately black town?
Critical Blast November 18th, 2014 at 16:55
It’s the anonymous guys in the white hoods vs. the anonymous guys in the white faces!
2007bubbles November 18th, 2014 at 22:35
Anonymous is winning. Yes yes yes
joe barry November 19th, 2014 at 23:10
It would help if the president of that KKK chapter had half-a-brain and knew something about computers. The fact that members had all that information on the web – shows that they are loaded with morons.
Critical Blast November 18th, 2014 at 17:55
It’s the anonymous guys in the white hoods vs. the anonymous guys in the white faces!
2007bubbles November 18th, 2014 at 23:35
Anonymous is winning. Yes yes yes
joe barry November 20th, 2014 at 00:10
It would help if the president of that KKK chapter had half-a-brain and knew something about computers. The fact that members had all that information on the web – shows that they are loaded with morons.