Republican Congressman Is Unaware There Is No Surgeon General To Address Ebola

Posted by | October 24, 2014 08:00 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Top Stories


One would think Republicans are aware that they blocked President Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, due to a backlash from the National Rifle Association.  But, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) says Ron Klain is “off to a bad start” in his new role as the president’s Ebola response coordinator, and that the U.S. Surgeon General should be the one leading the effort, the Huffington Post reports.

Except America has not had a surgeon general for more than a year.

“Why not have the surgeon general head this up?” Chaffetz asked.”I think that’s a very legitimate question. At least you have somebody who has a medical background whose been confirmed by the United States Senate.”

“It begs the question, what does the surgeon general do?” he added. “Why aren’t we empowering that person?”

Actually, blocking Murthy’s nomination all came down to this tweet:

Which resulted in this:

“Simply put, confirmation of Dr. Murthy is a prescription for disaster for America’s gun owners,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s legislative arm, wrote to Senate leaders in February.

And that’s why we don’t have a surgeon general. America’s biggest gun rights lobbyist decided against him. It “begs the question” as to why Chaffetz doesn’t direct his anger toward the NRA.  I think that’s a “very legitimate question” and one we already know the answer to.

Chaffetz later explained to The Huffington Post that he was not saying that the surgeon general, which doesn’t exist, should be in charge of the Ebola response, but rather that the Office of the Surgeon General should be.

“Well I do know there’s an acting surgeon general, I understand that. The surgeon general is also an office. It’s the Office of the Surgeon General. I know there’s some confusion there, but I don’t think I was confused,” Chaffetz said.

“I question why we would have a person that was put forward as a czar, when you do have an acting surgeon general,” he continued. “The point is the person the president has appointed doesn’t feel prepared to come before Congress.”

Well, perhaps Dr. Murthy would have, but he’s not the Surgeon General because our elected officials are licking the NRA’s boots. And that makes, “Tired of politicians playing politics w/ guns, putting lives at risk b/c they’re scared of NRA. Guns are a health care issue” true.

Chaffetz, in lockstep with his Republican colleagues, has blasted the President for not doing enough to secure the embassy in Benghazi, Libya, but he previously voted to cut funding for U.S. embassy security. He was probably unaware of that, too.

H/T: @ComgenKDT with thanks. 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland

44 responses to Republican Congressman Is Unaware There Is No Surgeon General To Address Ebola

  1. Bunya October 24th, 2014 at 14:13

    Does this really surprise anybody? This is the same party that embarrassed the country by putting imbeciles like Ronald Reagan and Dubya in the White House, and impeaching a president over a BJ. Republicans saying and doing stupid shit is just par for the course.

  2. Bunya October 24th, 2014 at 14:13

    Does this really surprise anybody? This is the same party that embarrassed the country by putting imbeciles like Ronald Reagan and Dubya in the White House, and impeaching a president over a BJ. Republicans saying and doing stupid shit is just par for the course.

  3. majii October 24th, 2014 at 20:53

    “”Simply put, confirmation of Dr. Murthy is a prescription for disaster
    for America’s gun owners,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s
    legislative arm, wrote to Senate leaders in February.”

    What????? Since when has a U.S. Surgeon General been able to circumvent Congress and impose his/her will onto the American people? This is an empty-ass and weak excuse meant to excuse Senate GOPTPers’ actions in blocking Dr. Murthy’s nomination and reduce the heat they’re taking for us not having a SG when Ebola has shown up in the U.S., and Cox knows it. This sh*t doesn’t even make sense, and only those who don’t know how new gun laws are enacted would believe this BS.

  4. majii October 24th, 2014 at 20:53

    “”Simply put, confirmation of Dr. Murthy is a prescription for disaster
    for America’s gun owners,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s
    legislative arm, wrote to Senate leaders in February.”

    What????? Since when has a U.S. Surgeon General been able to circumvent Congress and impose his/her will onto the American people? This is an empty-ass and weak excuse meant to excuse Senate GOPTPers’ actions in blocking Dr. Murthy’s nomination and reduce the heat they’re taking for us not having a SG when Ebola has shown up in the U.S., and Cox knows it. This sh*t doesn’t even make sense, and only those who don’t know how new gun laws are enacted would believe this BS.

  5. allison1050 October 25th, 2014 at 05:19

    And this is some of the so called best that the repoo’s can come up with? The party is doomed. lol

  6. allison1050 October 25th, 2014 at 05:19

    And this is some of the so called best that the repoo’s can come up with? The party is doomed. lol

1 2

Leave a Reply