Mayor: A Gang Of Armed White Men Will Be Standing Along Parade Route, Do Not Be Alarmed
Open Carry activists would have us believe that people are not afraid of guns while they strut into family friendly establishments with military-style weapons strapped to their backs.
Via Your Houston News:
The Fair Parade committee approved this group’s application. They have agreed not to carry any firearms in the parade; however there may be members of the group along the parade route displaying rifles, shotguns and black powder pistols in open holsters, which is legal in TX.
This information is being released in the interest of Public Safety so that citizens attending the parade will not be alarmed if they sec non-uniformed individuals carrying weapons.
[sic]
So a press release was issued so that the public will not be “alarmed” when they see an armed gang of white guys standing along the parade route displaying their long guns. Open Carry Texas and other groups have been marching in parades lately as a form of self-promotion, which they no doubt will call ‘exercising their Second Amendment rights.”
What these groups are trying to do is desensitize the population so that witnessing their tactics will eventually not be an issue with residents in neighborhoods they invade. Because their rights trump yours. Because they are just that f*cking special. Because sometimes intimidation works and they will push the boundaries.
Because they don’t care what you think, if you’re uncomfortable or if your children are frightened.
Big thanks to my friend out there for sending me the link.
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100
mea_mark October 11th, 2014 at 17:13
If they are not in a designated area along the route I could avoid, I wouldn’t go or take children.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:22
Any more, I’d just avoid crowds, period. Especially if there is booze available.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:44
Booze and firearms? What could possibly go wrong?
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 23:23
Time-honored American party staples. I’m surprised that there was no gunfire at the Palin family brawl. Alaska is big on guns, and there are basically no restrictions on them.
mea_mark October 11th, 2014 at 17:13
If they are not in a designated area along the route I could avoid, I wouldn’t go or take children.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:22
Any more, I’d just avoid crowds, period. Especially if there is booze available.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:44
Booze and firearms? What could possibly go wrong?
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 23:23
Time-honored American party staples. I’m surprised that there was no gunfire at the Palin family brawl. Alaska is big on guns, and there are basically no restrictions on them.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 17:14
and no one should be alarmed when one of them just happens to be bi-polar or a paranoid schiziod. this is the best opportunity to allow someone of ill will to exact their want, to just shoot the fk out of people. pigs in a blanket.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:21
I’d make a wild guess that roughly half of them would not pass a background check.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 21:58
you’re being generous.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:15
You’re probably right. And my gawd–don’t they feel just a little bit silly?
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 22:44
why? they are operating with only a few brain cells between the lot of them.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:59
True that–they probably think that they look really cool–just like their favorite video game. If they think at all, they may be wondering why all the sexy babes (in their imagination) aren’t flocking to them…
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 17:14
and no one should be alarmed when one of them just happens to be bi-polar or a paranoid schiziod. this is the best opportunity to allow someone of ill will to exact their want, to just shoot the fk out of people. pigs in a blanket.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:21
I’d make a wild guess that roughly half of them would not pass a background check.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 21:58
you’re being generous.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:15
You’re probably right. And my gawd–don’t they feel just a little bit silly?
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 22:44
why? they are operating with only a few brain cells between the lot of them.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:59
True that–they probably think that they look really cool–just like their favorite video game. If they think at all, they may be wondering why all the sexy babes (in their imagination) aren’t flocking to them…
Jones October 11th, 2014 at 17:18
Terrific opportunity for a terrorist.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 17:30
and you can trust their weapons WILL be loaded.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:19
I wonder what they’ll do it the black open carry group shows up.
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 20:52
pee their pants and call the cops
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:23
I can hear the Monty Python knights yelling “Run away! Run away!” in the background…
cargosquid October 12th, 2014 at 17:46
What will you do if a black group shows up?
M D Reese October 12th, 2014 at 17:48
Huh? Read about it, I guess…
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 01:32
That is exactly what we would do.
Or we would stand beside them.
M D Reese October 13th, 2014 at 17:52
Where I live there are about 20 black people and there are no open carry groups of any race, so I won’t be seeing it happen here. So I’ll just have to read about it.
Jones October 11th, 2014 at 17:18
Terrific opportunity for a terrorist.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 17:30
and you can trust their weapons WILL be loaded.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:19
I wonder what they’ll do if the black open carry group shows up.
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 20:52
pee their pants and call the cops
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:23
I can hear the Monty Python knights yelling “Run away! Run away!” in the background…
cargosquid October 12th, 2014 at 17:46
What will you do if a black group shows up?
M D Reese October 12th, 2014 at 17:48
Huh? Read about it, I guess…
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 01:32
That is exactly what we would do.
Or we would stand beside them.
M D Reese October 13th, 2014 at 17:52
Where I live there are about 20 black people and there are no open carry groups of any race, so I won’t be seeing it happen here. So I’ll just have to read about it.
tiredoftea October 11th, 2014 at 17:27
Parents, don’t let your kids hold their hot dogs and cotton candy unattended!
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 17:31
any parent with an ounce of sense would not attend period.
tiredoftea October 11th, 2014 at 17:36
It’s Texas! Sense is hardly ever seen there. With full apologies to mea_mark!
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 17:42
and me
tiredoftea October 11th, 2014 at 17:43
Oh, OK, you too!
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 17:45
:) :) :)
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:02
What ever ya do…
Don’t drink the water in Texas…
It seems to be tainted with crazy..:)
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:18
I’ll bet you can set it on fire, too.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:18
…or make any sudden movements…
tiredoftea October 11th, 2014 at 17:27
Parents, don’t let your kids hold their hot dogs and cotton candy unattended!
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 17:31
any parent with an ounce of sense would not attend period.
tiredoftea October 11th, 2014 at 17:36
It’s Texas! Sense is hardly ever seen there. With full apologies to mea_mark!
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 17:42
and me
tiredoftea October 11th, 2014 at 17:43
Oh, OK, you too!
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 17:45
:) :) :)
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:02
What ever ya do…
Don’t drink the water in Texas…
It seems to be tainted with crazy..:)
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:18
I’ll bet you can set it on fire, too.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:18
…or make any sudden movements…
uzza October 11th, 2014 at 17:49
When you have to send out advance notices to people that you aren’t going to kill them, you just might be doing something wrong.
Anomaly 100 October 11th, 2014 at 18:06
This ^,
cargosquid October 12th, 2014 at 17:44
You send out advance notice because there are hoplophobes like the gun control bigots out there that like to SWAT innocent people.
uzza October 11th, 2014 at 17:49
When you have to send out advance notices to people that you aren’t going to kill them, you just might be doing something wrong.
Anomaly 100 October 11th, 2014 at 18:06
This ^,
cargosquid October 12th, 2014 at 17:44
You send out advance notice because there are hoplophobes like the gun control bigots out there that like to SWAT innocent people.
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:00
I hope no one is alarmed if Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army also openly carries their weapons in a display of support for “second amendment” rights and open carry laws in Texas…
Something tells me that an anti-ISIL militia, (the Mahdi Army) would not be welcome in Texas..(armed or other wise)..
Whats the difference between these “white Texan Christian militia” and the “Mahadi Army” in Iraq?.
They seem to be cut out of the same cloth.
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:15
Nothing to see here..
These good old boys are just protecting your “right to bare arms”
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/03/28/basra460.jpg
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 18:21
especially if they are American citizens. if its good for the goose….
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:00
I hope no one is alarmed if Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army also openly carries their weapons in a display of support for “second amendment” rights and open carry laws in Texas…
Something tells me that an anti-ISIL militia, (the Mahdi Army) would not be welcome in Texas..(armed or other wise)..
Whats the difference between these “white Texan Christian militia” and the “Mahadi Army” in Iraq?.
They seem to be cut out of the same cloth.
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:15
Nothing to see here..
These good old boys are just protecting your “right to bare arms”
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/03/28/basra460.jpg
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 18:21
especially if they are American citizens. if its good for the goose….
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:09
I dont understand what it is that compels people to openly brandish assault style rifles or any fire arms in public..
We have all seen the videos of those in other countries with AK-47’s and even RPG’s walking the streets and even emptying 30 round magizines in to he air in “celebration”..
Is this the kind on nation we want to become?..
Or are we already there?
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:41
Winchester wants that. Every shot fired into the air is money in their pocket.
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:38
The NRA is the main lobby group for arms manufacturers. The more guns sales the better the NRA likes it.
StoneyCurtisll October 11th, 2014 at 18:09
I dont understand what it is that compels people to openly brandish assault style rifles or any fire arms in public..
We have all seen the videos of those in other countries with AK-47’s and even RPG’s walking the streets and even emptying 30 round magizines in to he air in “celebration”..
Is this the kind on nation we want to become?..
Or are we already there?
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:41
Winchester wants that. Every shot fired into the air is money in their pocket.
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:38
The NRA is the main lobby group for arms manufacturers. The more guns sales the better the NRA likes it.
Guy Lauten October 11th, 2014 at 18:25
more from the SPGC
Guy Lauten October 11th, 2014 at 18:25
more from the SPGC
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:17
They’re just like the christian uber alles crowd–gotta shove it down your throat whenever possible.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:53
Nice job comparing Christians to Nazis. Smooth.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:56
When the shoe fits. They really can’t see the similarities.
r_dale October 11th, 2014 at 22:59
I compare them to ISIS. The only difference is the beards.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:04
I’m not a Christian, but I’ll stand by their side any day of the week fighting the Islamists. Also, don’t call them ISIS, try daesh instead.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:38
christians are fighting against Americans everyday. only difference is they are not beheading anyone. if you don’t agree with their beliefs (they are your biggest hypocrites by the way) they will protest your funeral, protest your lifestyle, send threatening messages to harm your family. my ass. oh and threaten to murder people crossing the border and let’s not forget, burning crosses, or claiming the jews are going to hell. well along with everyone else but them.
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:36
The Nazis were for the most part christians. Hitler was a good Catholic.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 20:17
They’re just like the christian uber alles crowd–gotta shove it down your throat whenever possible.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:53
Nice job comparing Christians to Nazis. Smooth.
M D Reese October 11th, 2014 at 22:56
When the shoe fits. They really can’t see the similarities.
r_dale October 11th, 2014 at 22:59
I compare them to ISIS. The only difference is the beards.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:04
I’m not a Christian, but I’ll stand by their side any day of the week fighting the Islamists. Also, don’t call them ISIS, try daesh instead.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:38
christians are fighting against Americans everyday. only difference is they are not beheading anyone. if you don’t agree with their beliefs (they are your biggest hypocrites by the way) they will protest your funeral, protest your lifestyle, send threatening messages to harm your family. my ass. oh and threaten to murder people crossing the border and let’s not forget, burning crosses, or claiming the jews are going to hell. well along with everyone else but them.
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:36
The Nazis were for the most part christians. Hitler was a good Catholic.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 21:24
Boo, hoo, hooo :-* pwease mommy, make the bwig bwad man with the big bwad gwun go away!
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 21:29
Frightening children and intimidating adults is amusing to you?
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 21:34
No, snivelling adults who cause their children to grow up to be the same, amuses me.
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 21:38
So you’re offering some great insight. Really valuable stuff, you must be a rocket scientist.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 21:41
Actually, I do have a degree in Aerospace Engineering!
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 21:45
Hmm, you must have attended a top notch school to be able to express yourself in such a compassionate and intelligent manner. Perhaps you could offer something of value to the debate or move on to a site more appreciative of your skills.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 23:10
Does Sesame Street have a comment forum?
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 22:24
liar. i would think an engineer would have some form of intellect (i could be wrong) but, why would you want to divuldge that information when you’re sounding like a flippin’ jackass. oh wait, because josephking isn’t your real name so no one can post your stupid comment on facebook for your fellow co-workers to see you’ve got some mental health issues.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:45
I don’t have Facebook, joker. I actually have principals and utilize capitalism to keep money from organization I don’t agree with. Why would you want to support Zuckerberg when he want to bring in millions of high skill workers with H1 visas, pay them crap, and take jobs from Americans?
Next…
p.s., I do not lie about my degree. Unlike, others we know to have blatantly lied…hint, hint, I lost my insurance plan
Obewon October 11th, 2014 at 23:18
How did you loose your “insurance plan” You failed a drug test? Why did your Insurer dump you? Preexisting exclusion? Nope! Lifetime care cap? Nope!
3/5/14 Obama Administration Extends “Keep Your Plan” Health Insurance Transition Policy for Two More Years to 2017. http://www.healthcarereformdigest.com/obama-administration-extends-keep-plan-health-insurance-transition-policy-two-years
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:22
Awesome, I’m so glad that we have a President who can unilaterally change settled law. Much better to have that, than to use those pesky methods put forth by the out of date Constitution.
Obewon October 11th, 2014 at 23:31
“Why did your Insurer dump you? “?!?!?! You didn’t know 300 repub amendments & Bills were included in ‘2010’s HC reform law reducing Federal Deficits $1.5T’-CBO? (ACA was paid for upon signing 3/21/14. The 27 M HC.Gov & State exchange buyers are primarily why CBO proves the ACA today saves more & costs less:)
Similarly you cried when GWB changed & delayed his “unfunded $500B” Medicare Part D Rollout for 6 Mos+’becuase of the Jewish holiday’?- True! You can’t make up GOP’s ‘We’ve got to stop being the party of of stupid shit’-Jindal
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:47
I’m a libertarian, not a republican. Sorry, to disappoint you.
Obewon October 11th, 2014 at 23:54
No you’re not! You vote Repub because there are only GOP & DEMS in the the House with just 2 Senate Indy’s in the Senate who both caucus with Dems Sen (I-VT) Sanders & Sen. (I-ME) Angus King!
You didn’t know? e.g. So? “Why did your Insurer dump you?” Teabagging in the Dr’s reception area?
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:35
Every ‘Libertarian’ I’ve heard or read about seems to agree with the Republican agenda right down the line.
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:33
Maybe it’s because the Administrative arm of the government has the authority, via the Constitution, to administer said law. The chief of the Administrative arm of the government is the President and he and his staff have thought enough about the people and the problems of implementation that they delayed the transition for a while. The phoney claims by critics notwithstanding.
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 01:30
This post is just on the aspect of administering the law as written. Some of the delays in implementation are/were perfectly w/in the POTUS’s domain. However, several delays weren’t(even though they had good ’cause’ as you noted) because of how the law was written… the dates there had ‘must be implemented’ and therefore any delay must be granted via a vote by congress and signed as law by POTUS as an amendment to the law changing the dates. POTUS did circumvent the law.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 01:35
If true then how come Issa’s ’50 weeks of hearings per year = “0 Indictments”‘? D’oh!
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 01:48
The one has absolutely nothing to do w/the other.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 02:01
Issa=0 indictments because POTUS Obama Broke no laws vs your false “optnion” “any delay must be granted via a vote by congress and signed as law by POTUS as an amendment to the law changing the dates. POTUS did circumvent the law.”-Full of crap.
Who was dim enough to tell you that? Your Fantasy News Channel via some Limbaugh puppet? GWB’s Medicare Part D delays were?
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 02:32
Just curious, why did you post, as a reply, a bunch of unrelated ramblings?
However, the language used in the 2 laws are different. Not to mention votes on the floor pertaining to Med B… contact the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) for details.
Oh yea, not to mention that many of the dems did their best to derail it…. seems like both sides do it too…
:)
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 02:45
Your false “claims” are always debunked. You remain debunked and a complete fool e.g.
A) There is 00.00% proof of your claim ‘Obama broke the law’-by delaying the ACA implementation.
~Likewise~
B) GWB’s Medicare Part D delays were what? And nobody said Medicare Part D delays were ‘breaking the law’ Felony? Impeachable?
Your elevator doesn’t go all the way to the top!
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 03:51
“Your false “claims” are always debunked”
Sure they are, that’s why you ramble and throw out kiddy insults instead of stay on topic, eh?
And aren’t you the one who wouldn’t accept a simple wager a few months ago or so? I remember you now.
“A) There is 00.00% proof of your claim ‘Obama’s Administration broke the law’-by delaying the “Administration” of the ACA implementation.”
The proof is in the language nut case, and we’ll let the courts decide, it is in court as we type.
“B) GWB’s “Medicare Part D” delays were what? And nobody said “Medicare Part D” delays were ‘breaking the law’ Or a Felony? Or Impeachable?”
Again with the rambling and not making sense. YOU compared the two, I said they were different.
“Your elevator doesn’t go all the way to the top! “pertaining to Med B”-WTF? “contact the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) for details”-Lol SoA: “Excuse Me I’d like to ask you a few questions”
Afraid of the answer you’d get, eh?
And have a nice day.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 04:14
Did you get the update above preemptively debunking your delusions? E. G. Updated “When Medicare Part D faced early troubles, many blue states came to its rescue.”-PolitiFact http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/nov/13/steve-israel/medicare-part-d-and-obamacare-health-care-gov/
“The GOP says Obama’s decision to postpone implementing the “employer mandate” stomps all over the Constitution. It doesn’t, and here’s why (SoA’s sources are full of crap)” http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/delaying-parts-of-obamacare-blatantly-illegal-or-routine-adjustment/277873/
As for ‘your wager’? That was the stupidest & dumbest bet ever offered with 0% likely acceptance by me, or any other LL’er. It took you days just to figure out you were denied a bet days earlier! Lol!
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 04:25
“with 0% likely acceptance by me”
Because you knew you’d lose and that’s why it took you days to come right out and say no bet.
BTW, when you get old enough to get your driver’s license, you’ll find life gets better and you won’t be as petty and bitter as you are now. With more of a social life then just posting on the family computer or where your mother gives you rides to, you’ll find adult behavior(such as civility, coherent paragraphs and such) is so much better.
Have a nice day.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 04:30
You offered nothing in your bet that would interest anyone on LL. Stick with betting mis/uninformed Limbots and faux news GOP TV junkies and impress yourself!
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 04:45
Have a nice day.
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 02:01
That was a nice puff piece that merely repeated the administrations justifications.
This piece is especially nice: The Administration has not postponed the employer mandate out of policy opposition to the ACA, nor to the specific provision itself. Thus, it’s misleading
to characterize the action as a “refusal to enforce.”
It is most definitely a refusal to enforce because the administration is opposed to the effects of the implementation. THAT is why it is illegal. Nowhere did the article provide any constitutional authority to change a law.
Obewon October 13th, 2014 at 02:21
If laws were broken then how come Issa’s 50 weeks of hearings per year = Zero Indictments? A: Issa is damaged goods that’s why GOP had to replace him as chairman.
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 02:55
Because Issa is busy with the other scandals. And the DOJ is blocking him.
Obewon October 13th, 2014 at 04:39
And as -you know every GOP congressional and Senate investigation proved the same thing that each Inspector General report concluded ‘No laws were broken by the Obama Admin.’
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 01:56
The authority to administer the law is not the authority to CHANGE the law. It must be administered as written and passed.
Try again.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:19
joker? haven’t been called that ever. lol
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 01:11
Of course “L” and TP are ruses for embarrassed GOP: “Official Facebook Page of United States Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)”-No Bibletarian mention. Senator Rand Paul | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/SenatorRandPaul
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:40
And I own a gun. And I’m a Liberal. And I think these open-carry douchelords are trying way too hard to over-compensate for their ‘shortcomings.’ And by ‘shortcomings’ I mean their micro-penises. There’s no other sane explanation for why they do what they do….
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:48
Wow, you people have some serious phallic fixations.
I agree that they are idiots, but to want to cower under the bed at the news of them being at the parade is laughable.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 23:02
Hey, we’re not the ones carrying around giant iron dicks strapped to our backs, pretending to be all manly, thinking we’re hot stuff because everyone is staring at us, and hiding like cowards behind the Second Amendment. These moronic children don’t frighten us. But the psychopaths among them do. One of these days one of them will snap, and bloody carnage will ensue. As a ‘rocket scientist’ (with terrible grammar and sentence structure), I’m sure you can understand that. Or maybe you’re just an idiot, too. Hard to tell here…..
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:05
Thanks for making my point, I love you!
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:16
why don’t you respond to my post above regarding your idiotic post about children.
DesertFox-1A October 21st, 2014 at 21:22
No, it just meant that I if I attended the parade I would have to wear my Kevlar body armor, just in case someone made one of them upset and he threw a temper tantrum. When I was your age, there was no need for everybody to want to parade around carrying their phallic symbols and act all macho. And as to the phallic fixation, only those of you who think they need to act like that has that problem. No thanks, I will defend myself if you please, and not rely on someone who would p–s their pants if someone pulled a gun on them.
Those who think that they need to walk around with a long gun on their shoulder is more a danger to the 2nd Amendment right to own a firearm than any liberal politician ever will be. As they will cause such a alarm that the repeal of the 2nd Amendment would pass without any effort. You endanger my right to own and fire my weapons more than any other thing in this country,
//s// A Proud Honorable Disabled American Veteran, 1970-1994, Combat 1919, A Liberal Owner of Firearms.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 21:54
wacko’s with guns appears to be what amazes you.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:02
Funny thing is, if people could actually think and not just react emotionally, they should be much more afraid of these people http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2808548/posts
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 22:08
“Texas ‘Sovereign Citizen’ Totally Loses His Sh*t, Sets Up Police Ambush, Opens Fire” i just read this article. now do you see why people have valid reasons to react? there will be police officers at these “events” and if some nut case wants to put on a front that he’s protesting for the same reasons, when in fact its his chance to “take out” the police/govt., i don’t find that a reason not to be afraid. get a grip.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:42
You know a Sovereign Citizen who has no respect for the US Constitution and a open carry proponent, couldn’t be more opposite right?
Next…
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:15
you obviously didn’t read my post properly. i said, put on a front. and he’s still a wacko with a gun, no my bad, an AK-47. next yourself.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:19
Hitler was a wacko with a gun too, let’s bring him into the conversation too. I’m sure it’s relevant somehow.
whatthe46 October 12th, 2014 at 00:15
listen. one more time. re-read my post about 5 times straight, then you just might catch my drift. if not, then its because your ignorance is bliss. who am i to fk that up.
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 22:16
what a funny little brietbart troll you are. You have a habit of whining and sounding like an inbred loser then whine when people call you out. poor little loser
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:40
WTF are you talking about? Where did I get called out?
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 22:18
Because Occupy is open carrying loaded weapons?
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:40
No, just raping and stealing.
OldLefty October 12th, 2014 at 08:39
No, just raping and stealing.
_______
That has pretty much been debunked.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/15/1065161/-Debunking-Breitbart-s-Occupy-Rape-List#
You can debunk it as “Daily Kos”, (while citing Free Republic) but one only has to look at THEIR sources.
Plus, much of it was stuff like THIS photo (used alone) from ‘The Blaze’, to show Occupy’s violence.
I dug around for the source of the photo and found it was from something else BEFORE Occupy.;
http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Aftermath-of-killing-by-officer-leaves-Oakland-1731044.php#photo-1288987
Not to mention ; Report: NYPD steers drunks to Occupy Wall Street Those found drinking in city parks are told by officers to “take it to Zuccotti,” the Daily News reports
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/report_nypd_steers_drunks_to_occupy_wall_street/
Anomaly 100 October 12th, 2014 at 15:08
Sorry, I had to delete his tweet. Free Republic links are not allowed.
Anomaly 100 October 12th, 2014 at 15:08
Sorry, I had to delete his tweet. Free Republic links are not allowed.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 21:50
don’t you think those students, from columbine to today, would be frightened by the sight of some unknown persons walking around with those guns for no reason what-so-ever? hell, you don’t have to be a parent who was affected by those murders of children to be afraid.
ExPFCWintergreen October 11th, 2014 at 22:27
Since they can’t stand around with their smaller-than-average-sized penises hanging out of their drawers, this is next best thing for them. Open Carry = public masturbation
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:39
You should be overjoyed by their small penises. What better to a liberal than an emasculated man, right? There are no difference in sexes, all people should act like women.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:54
Why do you hate women? Were you beaten up by girls as a child?
That would certainly explain a lot.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:55
At least you didn’t call me a racist, just the fallback claim sexist. I give you props!
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 23:08
Nice dodge. So you WERE beaten up by girls as a child. Which explains your misogyny today. I have no idea if you’re a racist or not. Although, based on your post, I’m guessing you’ve had to defend yourself from that particular accusation before. If the shoe fits……..
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:10
Mentioning sex doesn’t make one sexist, no matter how much you want it to.
Shades October 12th, 2014 at 08:23
“Mentioning” sex isn’t how it works. Maybe you’d find out if you weren’t so preoccupied with guns.
ExPFCWintergreen October 11th, 2014 at 23:49
Spoken like someone who knows an awful lot about small penises. You poor thing. (Pssst, don’t look now, Rambo, but that AR-15 ain’t making it look any bigger, much as you might enjoy wiggling it while you admire yourself posing with your rifle in the mirror.)
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 01:51
Funny how gun control bigots are worried about our penises.
I admit that I’m compensating. Mine cannot project small bits of metal at 1500 fps and hit a target accurately at 25 yard. And I am truly tired of having to defend myself by waiting for any perp to come within 3 feet so that I can club him down with it.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 21:24
Boo, hoo, hooo :-* pwease mommy, make the bwig bwad man with the big bwad gwun go away!
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 21:29
Frightening children and intimidating adults is amusing to you?
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 21:34
No, snivelling adults who cause their children to grow up to be the same, amuses me.
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 21:38
So you’re offering some great insight. Really valuable stuff, you must be a rocket scientist.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 21:41
Actually, I do have a degree in Aerospace Engineering!
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 21:45
Hmm, you must have attended a top notch school to be able to express yourself in such a compassionate and intelligent manner. Perhaps you could offer something of value to the debate or move on to a site more appreciative of your skills.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 23:10
Does Sesame Street have a comment forum?
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 22:24
liar. i would think an engineer would have some form of intellect (i could be wrong) but, why would you want to divuldge that information when you’re sounding like a flippin’ jackass. oh wait, because josephking isn’t your real name so no one can post your stupid comment on facebook for your fellow co-workers to see you’ve got some mental health issues.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:45
I don’t have Facebook, joker. I actually have principals and utilize capitalism to keep money from organization I don’t agree with. Why would you want to support Zuckerberg when he want to bring in millions of high skill workers with H1 visas, pay them crap, and take jobs from Americans?
Next…
p.s., I do not lie about my degree. Unlike, others we know to have blatantly lied…hint, hint, I lost my insurance plan
Obewon October 11th, 2014 at 23:18
How did you loose your “insurance plan” You failed a drug test? Why did your Insurer dump you? Preexisting exclusion? Nope! Lifetime care cap? Nope!
3/5/14 Obama Administration Extends “Keep Your Plan” Health Insurance Transition Policy for Two More Years to 2017. http://www.healthcarereformdigest.com/obama-administration-extends-keep-plan-health-insurance-transition-policy-two-years
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:22
Awesome, I’m so glad that we have a President who can unilaterally change settled law. Much better to have that, than to use those pesky methods put forth by the out of date Constitution.
Obewon October 11th, 2014 at 23:31
1. “Why did your Insurer dump you? “?!?!?!
2. You didn’t know 300 repub amendments & Bills were included in ‘2010’s HC reform law reducing Federal Deficits $1.5T’-CBO? (ACA was paid for upon signing 3/21/14. The 27 M HC.Gov & State exchange buyers are primarily why CBO proves the ACA today saves more & costs less:) http://acasignups.net/
3. Similarly you cried when GWB changed & delayed his “unfunded $500 B” Medicare Part D Rollout for 6 Mos+’because of the Jewish holiday’ And then the Medicare-D Website didn’t work for EONS?- True! You can’t make up GOP’s ‘We’ve got to stop being the party of of stupid shit’-Jindal
So? “Why did your Insurer dump you? “?!?!?! Blow Me Down! Another troll lie busted!
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:47
I’m a libertarian, not a republican. Sorry, to disappoint you.
Obewon October 11th, 2014 at 23:54
No you’re not! You vote Repub because there are only GOP & DEMS in the the House, with just 2 Senate Indy’s who both caucus with Dems. Sen (I-VT) Sanders & Sen. (I-ME) Angus King!
You didn’t know there are no elected Libertarians?
And again: “Why did your Insurer dump you?” You were caught teabagging in the Dr’s reception area? Most like you are also too ashamed to admit they vote Republiklan, just like you do!
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:35
Every ‘Libertarian’ I’ve heard or read about seems to agree with the Republican agenda right down the line.
Dwendt44 October 12th, 2014 at 00:33
Maybe it’s because the Administrative arm of the government has the authority, via the Constitution, to administer said law. The chief of the Administrative arm of the government is the President and he and his staff have thought enough about the people and the problems of implementation that they delayed the transition for a while. The phoney claims by critics notwithstanding.
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 01:30
This post is just on the aspect of administering the law as written. Some of the delays in implementation are/were perfectly w/in the POTUS’s domain. However, several delays weren’t(even though they had good ’cause’ as you noted) because of how the law was written… the dates there had ‘must be implemented’ and therefore any delay must be granted via a vote by congress and signed as law by POTUS as an amendment to the law changing the dates. POTUS did circumvent the law.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 01:35
If true then how come Issa’s ’50 weeks of hearings per year = “0 Indictments”‘? D’oh!
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 01:48
The one has absolutely nothing to do w/the other.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 02:01
Issa=0 indictments because POTUS Obama Broke no laws vs your false ‘optnion’ SoA>”any delay must be granted via a vote by congress and signed as law by POTUS as an amendment to the law changing the dates. POTUS did circumvent the law.”-is full of crap.
1. Who was dim enough to tell you that? A? Your Fantasy News Channel via some Limbaugh puppet? 2. GWB’s Medicare Part D delays were what? 3. And nobody said Medicare Part D delays were ‘breaking the law’ 4. Or a Felony? 5. Or Impeachable? ->See both sides are not the same ‘they did it too!’-SOA. 6. When did Dems say GWB’s Medicare D delays were illegal?
Updated “When Medicare Part D faced early troubles, many blue states came to its rescue.”-PolitiFact http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/nov/13/steve-israel/medicare-part-d-and-obamacare-health-care-gov/ “The GOP says Obama’s decision to postpone implementing the “employer mandate” stomps all over the Constitution. It doesn’t, and here’s why (SoA’s sources are full of crap)” http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/delaying-parts-of-obamacare-blatantly-illegal-or-routine-adjustment/277873/
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 02:32
Just curious, why did you post, as a reply, a bunch of unrelated ramblings?
However, the language used in the 2 laws are different. Not to mention votes on the floor pertaining to Med B… contact the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) for details.
Oh yea, not to mention that many of the dems did their best to derail it…. seems like both sides do it too…
:)
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 02:45
Your false “claims” are always debunked. Where do you get ‘your news’ that ‘you claim’ is correct? Your sources remain debunked as complete fools e.g. A) There is 00.00% proof of your claim ‘Obama’s Administration broke the law’-by delaying the “Administration” of the ACA implementation.
~Likewise~ B) GWB’s “Medicare Part D” delays were what? And nobody said “Medicare Part D” delays were ‘breaking the law’ Or a Felony? Or Impeachable?
Your elevator doesn’t go all the way to the top! “pertaining to Med B”-WTF? “contact the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) for details”-Lol SoA: “Excuse Me I’d like to ask you a few questions” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DrRE1LDY_U
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 03:51
“Your false “claims” are always debunked”
Sure they are, that’s why you ramble and throw out kiddy insults instead of stay on topic, eh?
And aren’t you the one who wouldn’t accept a simple wager a few months ago or so? I remember you now.
“A) There is 00.00% proof of your claim ‘Obama’s Administration broke the law’-by delaying the “Administration” of the ACA implementation.”
The proof is in the language nut case, and we’ll let the courts decide, it is in court as we type.
“B) GWB’s “Medicare Part D” delays were what? And nobody said “Medicare Part D” delays were ‘breaking the law’ Or a Felony? Or Impeachable?”
Again with the rambling and not making sense. YOU compared the two, I said they were different.
“Your elevator doesn’t go all the way to the top! “pertaining to Med B”-WTF? “contact the office of Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) for details”-Lol SoA: “Excuse Me I’d like to ask you a few questions”
Afraid of the answer you’d get, eh?
And have a nice day.
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 04:14
Did you get the update above preemptively debunking your delusions? E. G. Updated “When Medicare Part D faced early troubles, many blue states came to its rescue.”-PolitiFact http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/nov/13/steve-israel/medicare-part-d-and-obamacare-health-care-gov/
“The GOP says Obama’s decision to postpone implementing the “employer mandate” stomps all over the Constitution. It doesn’t, and here’s why (SoA’s sources are full of crap)” http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/delaying-parts-of-obamacare-blatantly-illegal-or-routine-adjustment/277873/
As for ‘your wager’? That was the stupidest & dumbest bet ever offered with 0% likely acceptance by me, or any other LL’er. It took you days just to figure out you were denied a bet days earlier! Lol!
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 04:30
You offered nothing in your bet that would interest anyone on LL. Stick with betting mis/uninformed Limbots and faux news GOP TV junkies to impress yourself!
Spirit of America October 12th, 2014 at 04:45
Have a nice day.
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 02:01
That was a nice puff piece that merely repeated the administrations justifications.
This piece is especially nice: The Administration has not postponed the employer mandate out of policy opposition to the ACA, nor to the specific provision itself. Thus, it’s misleading
to characterize the action as a “refusal to enforce.”
It is most definitely a refusal to enforce because the administration is opposed to the effects of the implementation. THAT is why it is illegal. Nowhere did the article provide any constitutional authority to change a law.
Obewon October 13th, 2014 at 02:21
If laws were broken then how come Issa’s 50 weeks of hearings per year = Zero Indictments? A: Issa is damaged goods that’s why GOP had to replace him as chairman.
You know every GOP congressional and Senate investigation proved the same thing that each Inspector General report concluded ‘No laws were broken by the Obama Admin.’
Here’s what corruption looks like: I Scooter Libbey outing Undercover CIA WMD program, FEC Felon Dinesh D’Souza, #2 DOJ Monica Goodling (resigned) and these 80+ GOP politicians, staffers charged, most were convicted, sentenced & imprisoned: Jack Abramoff | Michael Scanlon | Adam Kidan | Ben Waldman | Konstantinos “Gus” Boulis | Grover Norquist | Ralph Reed | Italia Federici | Rev. Louis P. Sheldon | David H. Safavian | J. Steven Griles | Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio) | Neil G. Volz | Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) | Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.) | Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) | Tony C. Rudy | Cabinett member Gail Norton resigned as Secretary of the Interior in March 2006- Before she could be investigated. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/custom/2005/12/23/CU2005122300939.html
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 02:55
Because Issa is busy with the other scandals. And the DOJ is blocking him.
Obewon October 13th, 2014 at 04:39
And as -you know every GOP congressional and Senate investigation proved the same thing that each Inspector General report concluded ‘No laws were broken by the Obama Admin.’
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 01:56
The authority to administer the law is not the authority to CHANGE the law. It must be administered as written and passed.
Try again.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:19
joker? haven’t been called that ever. lol
Obewon October 12th, 2014 at 01:11
Of course “L” and TP are ruses for embarrassed GOP: “Official Facebook Page of United States Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)”-No Bibletarian mention. Senator Rand Paul | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/SenatorRandPaul
Even ReaganBook.com is too embarrassed to associate with clowns, and redirects to FreedomBook.com A FakeBook.com for constitutional illiterates. ‘Freedom Book is an invite only community. Enter your email below if you have received an invitation’ from a biostitute. 3 Users. Woo-hoo! http://freedombook.com/user/browse/ Maybe it’s their misspelled lone poll? How many friends can you invite to join ReaganBook? (It’s FreedumBook Janet.)
June 10, 2014 by Janet Porter
100
5 http://freedombook.com/poll/
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:40
And I own a gun. And I’m a Liberal. And I think these open-carry douchelords are trying way too hard to over-compensate for their ‘shortcomings.’ And by ‘shortcomings’ I mean their micro-penises. There’s no other sane explanation for why they do what they do….
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:48
Wow, you people have some serious phallic fixations.
I agree that they are idiots, but to want to cower under the bed at the news of them being at the parade is laughable.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 23:02
Hey, we’re not the ones carrying around giant iron dicks strapped to our backs, pretending to be all manly, thinking we’re hot stuff because everyone is staring at us, and hiding like cowards behind the Second Amendment. These moronic children don’t frighten us. But the psychopaths among them do. One of these days one of them will snap, and bloody carnage will ensue. As a ‘rocket scientist’ (with terrible grammar and sentence structure), I’m sure you can understand that. Or maybe you’re just an idiot, too. Hard to tell here…..
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:05
Thanks for making my point, I love you!
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:16
why don’t you respond to my post above regarding your idiotic post about children.
Shelly Ann LPN(ret) October 21st, 2014 at 21:22
No, it just meant that I if I attended the parade I would have to wear my Kevlar body armor, just in case someone made one of them upset and he threw a temper tantrum. When I was your age, there was no need for everybody to want to parade around carrying their phallic symbols and act all macho. And as to the phallic fixation, only those of you who think they need to act like that has that problem. No thanks, I will defend myself if you please, and not rely on someone who would p–s their pants if someone pulled a gun on them.
Those who think that they need to walk around with a long gun on their shoulder is more a danger to the 2nd Amendment right to own a firearm than any liberal politician ever will be. As they will cause such a alarm that the repeal of the 2nd Amendment would pass without any effort. You endanger my right to own and fire my weapons more than any other thing in this country,
//s// A Proud Honorable Disabled American Veteran, 1970-1994, Combat 1919, A Liberal Owner of Firearms.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 21:54
wacko’s with guns appears to be what amazes you.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 22:08
“Texas ‘Sovereign Citizen’ Totally Loses His Sh*t, Sets Up Police Ambush, Opens Fire” i just read this article. now do you see why people have valid reasons to react? there will be police officers at these “events” and if some nut case wants to put on a front that he’s protesting for the same reasons, when in fact its his chance to “take out” the police/govt., i don’t find that a reason not to be afraid. get a grip.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:42
You know a Sovereign Citizen who has no respect for the US Constitution and a open carry proponent, couldn’t be more opposite right?
Next…
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 23:15
you obviously didn’t read my post properly. i said, put on a front. and he’s still a wacko with a gun, no my bad, an AK-47. next yourself.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:19
Hitler was a wacko with a gun too, let’s bring him into the conversation too. I’m sure it’s relevant somehow.
whatthe46 October 12th, 2014 at 00:15
listen. one more time. re-read my post about 5 times straight, then you just might catch my drift. if not, then its because your ignorance is bliss. who am i to fk that up.
tracey marie October 11th, 2014 at 22:16
what a funny little brietbart troll you are. You have a habit of whining and sounding like an inbred loser then whine when people call you out. poor little loser
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:40
WTF are you talking about? Where did I get called out?
Carla Akins October 11th, 2014 at 22:18
Because Occupy is open carrying loaded weapons?
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:40
No, just raping and stealing.
OldLefty October 12th, 2014 at 08:39
No, just raping and stealing.
_______
That has pretty much been debunked.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/15/1065161/-Debunking-Breitbart-s-Occupy-Rape-List#
You can debunk it as “Daily Kos”, (while citing Free Republic) but one only has to look at THEIR sources.
Plus, much of it was stuff like THIS photo (used alone) from ‘The Blaze’, to show Occupy’s violence.
I dug around for the source of the photo and found it was from something else BEFORE Occupy.;
http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Aftermath-of-killing-by-officer-leaves-Oakland-1731044.php#photo-1288987
Not to mention ; Report: NYPD steers drunks to Occupy Wall Street Those found drinking in city parks are told by officers to “take it to Zuccotti,” the Daily News reports
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/report_nypd_steers_drunks_to_occupy_wall_street/
Anomaly 100 October 12th, 2014 at 15:08
Sorry, I had to delete his tweet. Free Republic links are not allowed.
whatthe46 October 11th, 2014 at 21:50
don’t you think those students, from columbine to today, would be frightened by the sight of some unknown persons walking around with those guns for no reason what-so-ever? hell, you don’t have to be a parent who was affected by those murders of children to be afraid.
ExPFCWintergreen October 11th, 2014 at 22:27
Since they can’t stand around with their smaller-than-average-sized penises hanging out of their drawers, this is next best thing for them. Open Carry = public masturbation
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:39
You should be overjoyed by their small penises. What better to a liberal than an emasculated man, right? There are no difference in sexes, all people should act like women.
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 22:54
Why do you hate women? Were you beaten up by girls as a child?
That would certainly explain a lot.
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 22:55
At least you didn’t call me a racist, just the fallback claim sexist. I give you props!
searambler October 11th, 2014 at 23:08
Nice dodge. So you WERE beaten up by girls as a child. Which explains your misogyny today. I have no idea if you’re a racist or not. Although, based on your post, I’m guessing you’ve had to defend yourself from that particular accusation before. If the shoe fits……..
josephKing October 11th, 2014 at 23:10
Mentioning sex doesn’t make one sexist, no matter how much you want it to.
Shades October 12th, 2014 at 08:23
“Mentioning” sex isn’t how it works. Maybe you’d find out if you weren’t so preoccupied with guns.
ExPFCWintergreen October 11th, 2014 at 23:49
Spoken like someone who knows an awful lot about small penises. You poor thing. (Pssst, don’t look now, Rambo, but that AR-15 ain’t making it look any bigger, much as you might enjoy wiggling it while you admire yourself posing with your rifle in the mirror.)
cargosquid October 13th, 2014 at 01:51
Funny how gun control bigots are worried about our penises.
I admit that I’m compensating. Mine cannot project small bits of metal at 1500 fps and hit a target accurately at 25 yard. And I am truly tired of having to defend myself by waiting for any perp to come within 3 feet so that I can club him down with it.