2-Year-Old Shot In The Head In What’s Described As An ‘Accident’
A two-year-old child was reportedly struck by gunfire inside a Delaware residence on Tuesday morning, according to police.
According to CBS Phily, the shooting happened at about 10:00 a.m. in a home at the Valley Run Apartments in Claymont, Delaware. Yahoo reports that the child was shot in the head and says the incident appears to be the result of a ‘”terrible accident.”
The child was transported to a children’s hospital and his or her condition is unknown at this time.
Because America is becoming so desensitized to this sort of shooting, no other information is available.
This is a gun safe:
This is a very inexpensive trigger lock, which can also be obtained from many police departments at no cost.
This is a happy baby who was not shot in the head.
Any questions?
H/T: @ComgenKDT
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Anomaly100
14 responses to 2-Year-Old Shot In The Head In What’s Described As An ‘Accident’
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
tracey marie September 30th, 2014 at 13:18
This is not an accident, period. An accident is when every precaution is taken and something bad happens, no precautions were taken. Charge the adults, it is about time for all these gun people to take personal responsibility for their inaction concerning safety and the deaths it cause
Carla Akins September 30th, 2014 at 13:18
You would honestly think that one or two of these stories would scare the living shit out parents and they would keep their firearms under lock and key. Since they aren’t, should they even be a gun owner?
tracey marie September 30th, 2014 at 13:21
They should not, they have proved they are neither intelligent or responsible
juicyfruityyy September 30th, 2014 at 13:40
They need to be held responsible. If there was no means to prevent the accident; they would have a case. However, there has always being ways to prevent such accidents. Therefore. they need to be held liable.
tracey marie September 30th, 2014 at 13:18
This is not an accident, period. An accident is when every precaution is taken and something bad happens, no precautions were taken. Charge the adults, it is about time for all these gun people to take personal responsibility for their inaction concerning safety and the deaths it cause
Carla Akins September 30th, 2014 at 13:18
You would honestly think that one or two of these stories would scare the living shit out parents and they would keep their firearms under lock and key. Since they aren’t, should they even be a gun owner?
tracey marie September 30th, 2014 at 13:21
They should not, they have proved they are neither intelligent or responsible
juicyfruityyy September 30th, 2014 at 13:40
They need to be held responsible. If there was no means to prevent the accident; they would have a case. However, there has always being ways to prevent such accidents. Therefore. they need to be held liable.
tiredoftea September 30th, 2014 at 13:55
“…the incident appears to be the result of a ”terrible accident.”, no, sorry it was anything but an accident. There should be jail time for whomever shot that baby.
Thank’s NRA for proving, again, and again, and again, that a home with a gun is a safe home! The children of our country salute you, at least the ones who survive gunshot wounds!
tiredoftea September 30th, 2014 at 13:55
“…the incident appears to be the result of a ”terrible accident.”, no, sorry it was anything but an accident. There should be jail time for whomever shot that baby.
Thank’s NRA for proving, again, and again, and again, that a home with a gun is a safe home! The children of our country salute you, at least the ones who survive gunshot wounds!
rat618 September 30th, 2014 at 14:34
As with the recent story of the baby being shot by hunters from across the street my only comment is that the injured was not a fetus so in the eyes of the Right “no harm no foul”.
rat618 September 30th, 2014 at 14:34
As with the recent story of the baby being shot by hunters from across the street my only comment is that the injured was not a fetus so in the eyes of the Right “no harm no foul”.
uzza September 30th, 2014 at 17:26
Just one question; Could that baby be any MOAR KYOOT?
uzza September 30th, 2014 at 17:26
Just one question; Could that baby be any MOAR KYOOT?