White House Openly Mocks Darrell Issa’s Latest Dumbass Subpoena
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is at it again, although he never really seems to stop. Stripped of his Benghazi blankie by the House select committee, and having already exhausted every other branch of the Scandalabra™, Issa is on to a brand new investigation that has the White House openly mocking him.
The IRS scandal won’t pan out no matter how hard the media tries to get it to, and no one even remembers why there was something called an “AP scandal,” so Issa has now moved on to an investigation that even Alanis Morrissette could correctly identify the irony of, and the White House is rather amused. At Friday’s daily briefing, The Hill‘s Justin Sink followed up his LeBron James question by asking about Issa’s latest subpoena, but he prefaced it by saying “And then a little more seriously, I guess, Darrell Issa has subpoenaed Dave Simas to appear…”
Simas, whom you may remember from the Obamacare website-fixing dream team, was appointed to head the newly-formed Office of Political Strategy and Outreach in January.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest interjected, with a smirk,
“Yes, I’m not sure that’s very serious.”
Earnest followed that zinger with a few minutes of the congressional investigation boilerplate that he gets to use so often, promising cooperation without consenting to a legislative colonoscopy, and briefly explaining the problem with Issa’s probe.
“In responding to questions from reporters and from Congress, we’ve explained that the office operates in full compliance with the Hatch Act [which prohibits non-elected executive branch officials from engaging in partisan activity], and to date, there’s not even any suggestion let alone evidence that we’ve deviated from the requirements of the Hatch Act. In fact, the Office of Special Counsel recognized in its 2011 report the propriety of having an office in the White House to provide the President with information about the current political environment and political issues nationwide. So I’d encourage you to check out that report if you’re as interested in this topic as Darrell Issa apparently is.
We have provided substantial information to Congress and we’re going to continue to cooperate with Congress to demonstrate our continued compliance with the Hatch Act. And the fact is that there’s not really any evidence to indicate that there’s a reason for Mr. Simas to appear before Congress. But for years there have been efforts between members of Congress and the White House to resolve these kinds of differences and to allow the legislative branch to perform the necessary function of oversight. So we’re going to continue our dialogue with Congress and do our best to make sure that they’re getting the kind of information and answers that they need when it comes to this matter.
But again, I just want to remind you and everyone else who’s covering this that there’s not even a shred of evidence to indicate any cause for concern.”
Earnest’s little zinger, while highly amusing (mostly because of how completely nuts it will drive right-wingers), isn’t even the funny part. The funny part is…READ MORE
Click here for reuse options!Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Tommy Christopher
Tommy Christopher is The Daily Banter's White House Correspondent and Political Analyst. He's been a political reporter and liberal commentator since 2007, and has covered the White House since the beginning of the Obama administration, first for PoliticsDaily, and then for Mediaite. Christopher is a frequent guest on a variety of television, radio, and online programs, and was the villain in the documentaries The Audacity of Democracy and Hating Breitbart. He's also That Guy Who Live-Tweeted His Own Heart Attack, and the only person to have ever received public apologies from both Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.
linkeditin July 14th, 2014 at 11:48
Simplify the tax code, flat 25% for everyone, eliminate all non profit status including that for churches and stop all foreign aid. That will get us out of debt.
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 11:55
I like some of that — but is it germaine (or even Tito?) to this story?
Carla Akins July 14th, 2014 at 12:33
do you sometimes feel, so very alone out there on your twisted humor limb?
Billy Jackson July 14th, 2014 at 12:38
Ummmm…..Excuse me…….
Carla Akins July 14th, 2014 at 13:14
Hell Billy, you only feel at home on that limb. :-)
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 14:14
It’s a small world here in side my head. On the plus side, they all know me here.
Carla Akins July 14th, 2014 at 12:03
Flat tax punishes the poor, it’s not a fix.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 12:10
No fix is needed, going further into debt is a calculated strategy for success
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:27
You only want to go into debt as a government until the economy is going strong, then you pay off the debt when tax receipts are high from a strong economy. If Dubya hadn’t lowered taxes and went to war on a wild spending spree, when the good economy he inherited was strong and had kept the debt low we wouldn’t be in the mess we are still working are way out of today.
Dwendt44 July 14th, 2014 at 12:34
Corporate welfare and the rich hiding their incomes in tax havens is why we are running a deficit. Corporate taxes USED to provide over 1/3 of federal revenue, now it’s down to ~7%., the working class makes up the difference.
China’s tariff is 10 times what our tariff is on their stuff.
Fair trade anyone?
We need a ‘whole company’ tax system, but we’ll never get it due to lobbying and campaign contributions to most of congress.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:45
The GOP needs to get kicked out of congress so we can fix things. Never is a very long time, I am not nearly so pessimistic. It may not be fixed soon but progress is being made and the GOP should have minimal influence by 2017.
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 13:58
In actuality, the GOP only has 24-27% of the electorate. The key is maximizing turnout in every election, because 80-90% of the Republican party base will ALWAYS turn out in every election. In low turnout elections, that almost guarantees the Repubs will win, which is why turnout is that important. Increase turnout, and Republicans don’t win anything.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 12:45
So then we are aggressively paying down our debt as we speak with the strong economy and high tax receipts, right?
Saint_Augustine July 14th, 2014 at 12:48
No, tax receipts are down due to Republicans’ inability to understand the consequences of their obstruction of Obama’s agenda and their addiction to corporate cash that led them to give excessive tax breaks to corporations.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 13:05
have you bothered to check who Democrats accept checks from?
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 13:57
Yes, a majority of the Democratic donations are from trial lawyers and labor unions, a majority of the Republican money are from financial companies and big oil.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 14:11
And their influence is different how?
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 15:29
Moving the goalposts.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:25
Precisely, when big money is funneled to a candidate you agree with, the goalposts move.
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 16:32
False analogy.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:59
How is it a false analogy? Democrats accept money form big corporations, PACS, 1%er’s, etc. It’s just that somehow the money they gladly accept is pure and chaste.
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 17:29
Did I post that Democrats don’t take money from big corporations?
No, I didn’t, I posted a MAJORITY of the Democratic money comes from trial lawyers and labor unions, that is what matters the most. A majority of the Republican money comes from financial companies and big oil. Milt Shook breaks down this difference and then some more effectively than I can at this link:
http://pleasecutthecrap.com/think-both-parties-get-campaign-money-from-same-people-think-again/
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 17:51
So again I ask, is the influence of big money a problem? Or is it just a problem when it comes from sources that you don’t agree with?
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 18:35
Personally, I don’t find PACs spending money a big problem, because spending money doesn’t guarantee a win in an election. In the end, the candidate that gets the most votes wins. Although I do find the money = speech argument absurd.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:51
Not yet. We are getting close to the tipping point where we can though. That is assuming the republicans will let us. The GOPers like to go on wild spending sprees blowing up other countries with all the toys the MIC makes.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 13:04
you’ll get no argument form me on GOP spending sprees
Dwendt44 July 15th, 2014 at 00:29
Either the flat tax or the ‘fair’ tax (sales tax) scams are just a scheme to give the rich another huge tax break. Some states with 0% income tax have high sales taxes and relatively high property taxes. Great for the well off, not so much for the poor and working class.
Carla Akins July 15th, 2014 at 05:23
Exactly. Under Brownback, Kansas has been a mess with his tax experiment plan. Recently, they were floating the idea of raising sales tax to 23% percent to cover the deficiency. It did not receive a warm reception.
jasperjava July 14th, 2014 at 19:25
Foreign aid represents less than one percent of the budget. That’s not where cuts need to be.
Eliminating non-profits will destroy a sector of the economy that employs millions.
A 25% flat tax will hurt the working poor far more than it does the billionaires.
jasperjava July 14th, 2014 at 19:25
Foreign aid represents less than one percent of the budget. That’s not where cuts need to be.
Eliminating non-profits will destroy a sector of the economy that employs millions.
A 25% flat tax will hurt the working poor far more than it does the billionaires.
linkeditin July 14th, 2014 at 11:48
Simplify the tax code, flat 25% for everyone, eliminate all non profit status including that for churches and stop all foreign aid. That will get us out of debt.
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 11:55
I like some of that — but is it germaine (or even Tito?) to this story?
Carla Akins July 14th, 2014 at 12:33
do you sometimes feel, so very alone out there on your twisted humor limb?
Billy Jackson July 14th, 2014 at 12:38
Ummmm…..Excuse me…….
Carla Akins July 14th, 2014 at 13:14
Hell Billy, you only feel at home on that limb. :-)
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 14:14
It’s a small world here in side my head. On the plus side, they all know me here.
Carla Akins July 14th, 2014 at 12:03
Flat tax punishes the poor, it’s not a fix.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 12:10
No fix is needed, going further into debt is a calculated strategy for success
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:27
You only want to go into debt as a government until the economy is going strong, then you pay off the debt when tax receipts are high from a strong economy. If Dubya hadn’t lowered taxes and went to war on a wild spending spree, when the good economy he inherited was strong and had kept the debt low we wouldn’t be in the mess we are still working are way out of today.
Dwendt44 July 14th, 2014 at 12:34
Corporate welfare and the rich hiding their incomes in tax havens is why we are running a deficit. Corporate taxes USED to provide over 1/3 of federal revenue, now it’s down to ~7%., the working class makes up the difference.
China’s tariff is 10 times what our tariff is on their stuff.
Fair trade anyone?
We need a ‘whole company’ tax system, but we’ll never get it due to lobbying and campaign contributions to most of congress.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:45
The GOP needs to get kicked out of congress so we can fix things. Never is a very long time, I am not nearly so pessimistic. It may not be fixed soon but progress is being made and the GOP should have minimal influence by 2017.
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 13:58
In actuality, the GOP only has 24-27% of the electorate. The key is maximizing turnout in every election, because 80-90% of the Republican party base will ALWAYS turn out in every election. In low turnout elections, that almost guarantees the Repubs will win, which is why turnout is that important. Increase turnout, and Republicans don’t win anything.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 12:45
So then we are aggressively paying down our debt as we speak with the strong economy and high tax receipts, right?
Saint_Augustine July 14th, 2014 at 12:48
No, tax receipts are down due to Republicans’ inability to understand the consequences of their obstruction of Obama’s agenda and their addiction to corporate cash that led them to give excessive tax breaks to corporations.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 13:05
have you bothered to check who Democrats accept checks from?
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 13:57
Yes, a majority of the Democratic donations are from trial lawyers and labor unions, a majority of the Republican money is from financial companies and big oil.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 14:11
And their influence is different how?
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 15:29
Moving the goalposts.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:25
Precisely, when big money is funneled to a candidate you agree with, the goalposts move.
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 16:32
False analogy.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:59
How is it a false analogy? Democrats accept money form big corporations, PACS, 1%er’s, etc. It’s just that somehow the money they gladly accept is pure and chaste.
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 17:29
Did I post that Democrats don’t take money from big corporations?
No, I didn’t, I posted a MAJORITY of the Democratic money comes from trial lawyers and labor unions, that is what matters the most. A majority of the Republican money comes from financial companies and big oil. Milt Shook breaks down this difference and then some more effectively than I can at this link:
http://pleasecutthecrap.com/think-both-parties-get-campaign-money-from-same-people-think-again/
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 17:51
So again I ask, is the influence of big money a problem? Or is it just a problem when it comes from sources that you don’t agree with?
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 18:35
Personally, I don’t find PACs spending money a big problem, because spending money doesn’t guarantee a win in an election. In the end, the candidate that gets the most votes wins. Although I do find the money = speech argument absurd.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:51
Not yet. We are getting close to the tipping point where we can though. That is assuming the republicans will let us. The GOPers like to go on wild spending sprees blowing up other countries with all the toys the MIC makes.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 13:04
you’ll get no argument form me on GOP spending sprees
Dwendt44 July 15th, 2014 at 00:29
Either the flat tax or the ‘fair’ tax (sales tax) scams are just a scheme to give the rich another huge tax break. Some states with 0% income tax have high sales taxes and relatively high property taxes. Great for the well off, not so much for the poor and working class.
Carla Akins July 15th, 2014 at 05:23
Exactly. Under Brownback, Kansas has been a mess with his tax experiment plan. Recently, they were floating the idea of raising sales tax to 23% percent to cover the deficiency. It did not receive a warm reception.
jasperjava July 14th, 2014 at 19:25
Foreign aid represents less than one percent of the budget. That’s not where cuts need to be.
Eliminating non-profits will destroy a sector of the economy that employs millions.
A 25% flat tax will hurt the working poor far more than it does the billionaires.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 11:49
The only thing really in jeopardy is Dave Simas’ hard drive
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 12:09
I’m sure it’s overdue for a crash in 5… 4… 3…
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 11:49
The only thing really in jeopardy is Dave Simas’ hard drive
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 12:09
I’m sure it’s overdue for a crash in 5… 4… 3…
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 11:55
“But again, I just want to remind you and everyone else who’s covering this that there’s not even a shred of evidence to indicate any cause for concern.”
Not even a smidgen?
Budda July 14th, 2014 at 12:04
No, not even a smidgen.
Montag July 14th, 2014 at 12:07
About as un-smidgenny as you could get. I know you crave a scandal, bit nothing x nothing is always nothing.
Pilotshark July 14th, 2014 at 12:16
Something must be wrong with me and my brain —
if I’m so patently unrewarding.
But my dreams are for dreaming and best left that
way — and my zero to your power of ten equals
nothing at all.
one white duck on the wall by Jetro Tull
Montag July 14th, 2014 at 12:22
I love me some Tull!!!
Seen them at least 5 times.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:47
Stormwatch, one of my all time favorite albums.
Pilotshark July 14th, 2014 at 12:55
me also matter of fact i will be seeing them on sept. 13th at a nice amphitheater.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 13:11
Wow, I just looked at tour dates. They are playing near me on my birthday at Austin City Limits.
Robert Johnston July 14th, 2014 at 13:41
I still have “Original Masters”…on CASSETTE, yet!
Still play it a lot, as well.
One song reminds me of Daryl Issa…
“THICK AS A BRICK.”
–RKJ
ChrisVosburg July 14th, 2014 at 13:58
Nice to see a few fans here. First saw ’em when I went to see the Moody Blues in, what, ’67 I guess. Also on the bill, a coupla brit bands nobody’d ever heard of, Jethro Tull being one of them. Oh yes, the other was some guys calling themselves “Led Zeppelin.”
The Thick as a Brick tour remains the best show I’ve ever seen, hands down. They actually played the entirety, with extended solos and hijinks, and after about an hour and a half of playing nonstop like madmen, they finally wound it down to the final verse.
After the gobsmacked explosion of applause, Ian Anderson strode up to the mike and really brought down the house: “Thank you! For our second number,…”
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 14:02
Nope. Obama is squeaky clean, and none of the fake “scandals” the Republicans has exploited against him has resulted in revealing that he or his administration were complicit in any wrongdoing. When you even have House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte saying they aren’t drawing up Articles of Impeachment, along with Mr. Wrongest Pundit Kristol being a stopped clock and admitting the impeachment silliness is absurd, you have to concede reality, which is POTUS Obama is NOT corrupt, and the Republicans asserting he is are wasting our time and our taxpayer dollars.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 14:13
The White House has checked itself thoroughly and has found nothing to be concerned about, please move along, just be careful when stepping over the crashed hard drives and redacted files.
Obewon July 14th, 2014 at 15:15
Issa’s “0 indictments” after 50 weeks of hearings per year proves “He’s damaged goods. That’s why they had to replace him as chairman”-Leader Pelosi proves what “I am not a republican”-Jeff Allen couldn’t.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:28
Why does my not being a republican bother you so much? I have to admit having multiple rooms to choose from is a nice accommodation.
Obewon July 14th, 2014 at 19:22
Jeff Allen isn’t fooling anybody by enabling and voting for GOP.
Dwendt44 July 15th, 2014 at 00:25
could be your parroting of Republican (Tealaban) talking points.
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 15:27
Red herring.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:26
Straw man, see I can type words too.
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 16:30
Appeal to ridicule.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:56
It’s not a Red Herring so it’s open to ridicule.
Sko Hayes July 14th, 2014 at 20:43
The White House has been investigated by Darrell Issa’s committee since he was given the chairmanship.
Either you’re saying Darrell Issa’s investigations are complete fails (since he’s failed to prove any of the claims he makes about the WH being involved in every “scandal” he’s investigated), or you’re simply pretending that all those hearings never happened.
R.J. Carter July 14th, 2014 at 11:55
“But again, I just want to remind you and everyone else who’s covering this that there’s not even a shred of evidence to indicate any cause for concern.”
Not even a smidgen?
Budda July 14th, 2014 at 12:04
No, not even a smidgen.
Montag July 14th, 2014 at 12:07
About as un-smidgenny as you could get. I know you crave a scandal, bit nothing x nothing is always nothing.
Pilotshark July 14th, 2014 at 12:16
Something must be wrong with me and my brain —
if I’m so patently unrewarding.
But my dreams are for dreaming and best left that
way — and my zero to your power of ten equals
nothing at all.
one white duck on the wall by Jetro Tull
Montag July 14th, 2014 at 12:22
I love me some Tull!!!
Seen them at least 5 times.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 12:47
Stormwatch, one of my all time favorite albums.
Pilotshark July 14th, 2014 at 12:55
me also matter of fact i will be seeing them on sept. 13th at a nice amphitheater.
mea_mark July 14th, 2014 at 13:11
Wow, I just looked at tour dates. They are playing near me on my birthday at Austin City Limits.
Robert Keith Johnston July 14th, 2014 at 13:41
I still have “Original Masters”…on CASSETTE, yet!
Still play it a lot, as well.
One song reminds me of Daryl Issa…
“THICK AS A BRICK.”
–RKJ
ChrisVosburg July 14th, 2014 at 13:58
Nice to see a few fans here. First saw ’em when I went to see the Moody Blues in, what, ’67 I guess. Also on the bill, a coupla brit bands nobody’d ever heard of, Jethro Tull being one of them. Oh yes, the other was some guys calling themselves “Led Zeppelin.”
The Thick as a Brick tour remains the best show I’ve ever seen, hands down. They actually played the entirety, with extended solos and hijinks, and after about an hour and a half of playing nonstop like madmen, they finally wound it down to the final verse.
After the gobsmacked explosion of applause, Ian Anderson strode up to the mike and really brought down the house: “Thank you! For our second number,…”
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 14:02
Nope. Obama is squeaky clean, and none of the fake “scandals” the Republicans has exploited against him has resulted in revealing that he or his administration were complicit in any wrongdoing. When you even have House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte saying they aren’t drawing up Articles of Impeachment, along with Mr. Wrongest Pundit Kristol being a stopped clock and admitting the impeachment silliness is absurd, you have to concede reality, which is POTUS Obama is NOT corrupt, and the Republicans asserting he is are wasting our time and our taxpayer dollars.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 14:13
The White House has checked itself thoroughly and has found nothing to be concerned about, please move along, just be careful when stepping over the crashed hard drives and redacted files.
Obewon July 14th, 2014 at 15:15
Issa’s “0 indictments” after 50 weeks of hearings per year proves “He’s damaged goods. That’s why they had to replace him as chairman”-Leader Pelosi proves what “I am not a republican”-Jeff Allen couldn’t.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:28
Why does my not being a republican bother you so much? I have to admit having multiple rooms to choose from is a nice accommodation.
Obewon July 14th, 2014 at 19:22
Jeff Allen isn’t fooling anybody by enabling and voting for GOP.
Dwendt44 July 15th, 2014 at 00:25
could be your parroting of Republican (Tealaban) talking points.
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 15:27
Red herring.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:26
Straw man, see I can type words too.
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 16:30
Appeal to ridicule.
Jeff Allen July 14th, 2014 at 16:56
It’s not a Red Herring so it’s open to ridicule.
Sko Hayes July 14th, 2014 at 20:43
The White House has been investigated by Darrell Issa’s committee since he was given the chairmanship.
Either you’re saying Darrell Issa’s investigations are complete fails (since he’s failed to prove any of the claims he makes about the WH being involved in every “scandal” he’s investigated), or you’re simply pretending that all those hearings never happened.
labman57 July 14th, 2014 at 12:38
Issa and his GOP cronies would have fleshed out the details of each of the alleged scandals more thoroughly, however they ran out of “whole cloth”.
labman57 July 14th, 2014 at 12:38
Issa and his GOP cronies would have fleshed out the details of each of the alleged scandals more thoroughly, however they ran out of “whole cloth”.
Obewon July 14th, 2014 at 13:03
If only Michele Bachmann would chime in on the White House drones targeting Issa’s compound. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rep-michele-bachmann-completely-baffles-john-brennan-with-bizarre-questions-during-cia-hearing/
Obewon July 14th, 2014 at 13:03
If only Michele Bachmann would chime in on the White House drone capability targeting Issa’s compound. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rep-michele-bachmann-completely-baffles-john-brennan-with-bizarre-questions-during-cia-hearing/
NW10 July 14th, 2014 at 13:59
Why is anyone still paying attention to that car thief?
(((NW10,PATRIOT! ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ))) July 14th, 2014 at 13:59
Why is anyone still paying attention to that car thief?
Denise July 14th, 2014 at 14:04
what exactly is the latest subpoena for? it hard to keep track without a score card. issa is wasting tax payer money. I hope he looses his seat.
Denise July 14th, 2014 at 14:04
what exactly is the latest subpoena for? it hard to keep track without a score card. issa is wasting tax payer money. I hope he looses his seat.
Judgeforyourself37 July 14th, 2014 at 14:43
Issa, like Palin and Bachmann should be ignored and perhaps they would go away.
Judgeforyourself37 July 14th, 2014 at 14:43
Issa, like Palin and Bachmann should be ignored and perhaps they would go away.
Rixar13 McGinnis July 14th, 2014 at 15:11
Test Issa for Drugs, seriously.
Dwendt44 July 15th, 2014 at 00:22
Stupid doesn’t show up on drug tests.
Rixar13 McGinnis July 14th, 2014 at 15:11
Test Issa for Drugs, seriously.
Dwendt44 July 15th, 2014 at 00:22
Stupid doesn’t show up on drug tests.
Tim Coolio July 14th, 2014 at 17:51
Republicans are feeling low because the ACA and Benghazi have blown up in their faces, Issa tries to make them feel better by opening another investigation.
Tim Coolio July 14th, 2014 at 17:51
Republicans are feeling low because the ACA and Benghazi have blown up in their faces, Issa tries to make them feel better by opening another investigation.