Pat Boone: Obama’s Birth Certificate Will Be Proven As Fake By September

Posted by | June 24, 2014 10:40 | Filed under: News Behaving Badly Politics Radio Interviews Top Stories


Legendary crooner Pat Boone appeared on my radio show Monday night and told me he had a “bombshell” to report. That “bombshell” was his belief that the birth certificate President Obama presented to the country after years of birther requests will be shown to be a fake. Boone said, “I’m not a birther…I’m a questioner.”

Boone: What I’m going to predict here is by September of this year, the major smoking gun, which is a high crime, not just a misdemeanor, but a high crime, that supposed copy of the birth certificate that is displayed on the White House website as we talk, by many experts has already proven not to be not a copy of anything, of something that perhaps doesn’t exist, which is an actual birth certificate, but it is a Photoshopped fraud created to look like what they wanted it to look like. And I say “they” because I don’t think it was the President himself but those around him. But experts who understand the techniques of these things, including a guy in my own office who knows how things are Photoshopped, and knows the telltale signs of things that have been pasted on to other documents or other things. It is obviously to anyone who knows that process is a fraud. It is not a copy of anything and that is a high crime.”

COLMES: Tell me how you know this.

BOONE: Well I’m talking to some people that they are trained detectives and investigators and I’ve been trying to get people in Congress to pay attention to these things and create. We should have to be us citizens saying, “Wait a minute, this thing doesn’t look real.”

COLMES: The State of Hawaii said this is a legitimate birth certificate

BOONE: There are trained investigators who are finding out, and I can’t divulge any more than I will make a prediction that by September of this year, it will be proven that that is not the case. And look, if there was a hospital in Hawaii, in which the President had been born, and they had a birth certificate to prove it, do you think there would be a plaque, something to indicate they’re proud.

COLMES: What I don’t understand is though Pat is two different Hawaiian publications within weeks of the birth of Barack Obama in 1961 there were notices, which are now on microfiche, you can find them, how can have appeared in Hawaiian newspapers within weeks of his birth, how did that happen?
BOONE: Well, the things that appeared in the paper were juts blanket announcements of his birth but they didn’t name a hospital or a birth certificate.

BOONE: For instance, just as an example, what if he was born in Mombasa? To a woman who could not get on the plane because she was too close to birth and after she delivered the baby she came to Honolulu because she wanted him to be known as an American citizen. What if her mother was working in the documents department?

COLMES: You believe he was not born in the United States?

BOONE: All I can tell you is I was in Mombasa just after he was elected and everybody there said, “You know you’re President was born here.” I brought home a T-shirt that said “Birthplace of the President of the United States.” Either the whole nation was fooled or there was something else going on.

COLMES: You also used the phrase “High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” So are you suggesting that with this revelation were it to occur as your predicting that it would be an impeachable offense?

BOONE: Look, I’m not a constitutional law expert so all I’m saying is I’m not going to try to draw, you know, either a judgment or a verdict. But I’m saying there are facts, smoking guns on the table that a Congressional committee ought to at least if nothing else settle all the doubt and the allegations that have been made and show substantive proof. But if this thing is a fraud if is a Photoshopped fraud, then there has to be some kind of reason for that.

BOONE: I’m not a birther

COLMES: But it sounds like it Pat, you know that based on what you’re saying?

BOONE: I’m a questioner

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Alan

Alan Colmes is the publisher of Liberaland.

410 responses to Pat Boone: Obama’s Birth Certificate Will Be Proven As Fake By September

  1. Linda June 25th, 2014 at 12:30

    If he’s a questioner maybe he should ask himself how on earth he can believe such bs. There are people who would pay $$$$$$ to have verifiable proof that the president’s birth certificate is fake. It’s been six years. Wise up, bigot.

  2. Elliot J. Stamler June 25th, 2014 at 12:58

    Who cares what this washed-up has-been who’s been blabbering the radical religious right baloney for 25+ years says or thinks?

  3. Elliot J. Stamler June 25th, 2014 at 12:58

    Who cares what this washed-up has-been who’s been blabbering the radical religious right baloney for 25+ years says or thinks?

  4. William Carr June 25th, 2014 at 15:32

    Actually, no, Pat: you’re a Birther.

    You ignore the Hawaiian State authorities that verified BOTH Birth Certificates.

    Are you REALLY willing to blow your reputation on this delusion?

    Do you think the Republican Party didn’t rush somebody over to Hawaii to check this out in 2008 ?

    Why is the only explanation for how this could happen … Republican Incompetence?

    • PlacidAir June 26th, 2014 at 17:26

      His reputation has been “blown” for a long time.

  5. musikfanat22 June 25th, 2014 at 15:32

    I
    remember him laughing at a racist joke when he was traveling with some
    republican politicians a few years ago. a real babylonian…

  6. William Carr June 25th, 2014 at 15:32

    Actually, no, Pat: you’re a Birther.

    You ignore the Hawaiian State authorities that verified BOTH Birth Certificates.

    Are you REALLY willing to blow your reputation on this delusion?

    Do you think the Republican Party didn’t rush somebody over to Hawaii to check this out in 2008 ?

    Why is the only explanation for how this could happen … Republican Incompetence?

    • PlacidAir June 26th, 2014 at 17:26

      His reputation has been “blown” for a long time.

  7. musikfanat22 June 25th, 2014 at 15:32

    I
    remember him laughing at a racist joke when he was traveling with some
    republican politicians a few years ago. a real babylonian…

  8. Becky Kapust Lillicotch June 25th, 2014 at 15:54

    And to think that I used to like Pat Boone when I was a teen! What a creep he turned out to be!!

    • Jim Valley June 26th, 2014 at 08:40

      He made his money in the early days sanitizing hits by black artists and “whitening them up” so they would be palatable to his lily white audience. Now he is apparently a sad, washed-up right-wing fool, like Victoria Jackson, Ted Nugent, Dennis Miller, and all the rest of them.

      • Becky Kapust Lillicotch June 28th, 2014 at 08:23

        The songs I enjoyed hearing him sing were “Love Letters in the Sand” and “April Love” and other ballads in the days when he was known for wearing white buckskin shoes. I quit following his music after I got out of high school.

  9. Becky Kapust Lillicotch June 25th, 2014 at 15:54

    And to think that I used to like Pat Boone when I was a teen! What a creep he turned out to be!!

    • Jim Valley June 26th, 2014 at 08:40

      He made his money in the early days sanitizing hits by black artists and “whitening them up” so they would be palatable to his lily white audience. Now he is apparently a sad, washed-up right-wing fool, like Victoria Jackson, Ted Nugent, Dennis Miller, and all the rest of them.

      • Becky Kapust Lillicotch June 28th, 2014 at 08:23

        The songs I enjoyed hearing him sing were “Love Letters in the Sand” and “April Love” and other ballads in the days when he was known for wearing white buckskin shoes. I quit following his music after I got out of high school.

  10. Tony June 25th, 2014 at 19:12

    I think the copy they pulled off the web and looked at had some deliberate irregularities. Stuff to keep the idiots busy. I mean Really,,,,NSA, CIA, FBI…If they wanted an undetectable fake, they’d have one. The problems that are obvious to home Photoshopers are deliberate…it’s like a bunch of stupid dogs chasing a laser pointer! And ol Pats one of them.

    • William Carr June 26th, 2014 at 18:42

      If the CIA wanted to fake a Hawaiian birth certificate, I’m sure they have sixty year old paper, official seals, and the techniques to make an undetectable forgery.

      Why can’t the bobble-heads on the Right realize this? They think AMATEURS can pick up a mistake by the CIA ?

  11. Tony June 25th, 2014 at 19:12

    I think the copy they pulled off the web and looked at had some deliberate irregularities. Stuff to keep the idiots busy. I mean Really,,,,NSA, CIA, FBI…If they wanted an undetectable fake, they’d have one. The problems that are obvious to home Photoshopers are deliberate…it’s like a bunch of stupid dogs chasing a laser pointer! And ol Pats one of them.

    • William Carr June 26th, 2014 at 18:42

      If the CIA wanted to fake a Hawaiian birth certificate, I’m sure they have sixty year old paper, official seals, and the techniques to make an undetectable forgery.

      Why can’t the bobble-heads on the Right realize this? They think AMATEURS can pick up a mistake by the CIA ?

  12. craig7120 June 25th, 2014 at 19:32

    BOONE: “All I can tell you is I was in Mombasa just after he was elected and everybody there said, “You know you’re President was born here.” I brought home a T-shirt that said “Birthplace of the President of the United States.”

    Alan is such a decent guy.
    Me on the other hand, would of had little patience with this has been, believing in some stranger in Africa than accepting the word of state officials.
    Pat, Nigeria has several princes who need a few extra dollars to get to their rightful inheritance, you will be rewarded handsomely.
    Pit-t-ful

  13. craig7120 June 25th, 2014 at 19:32

    BOONE: “All I can tell you is I was in Mombasa just after he was elected and everybody there said, “You know you’re President was born here.” I brought home a T-shirt that said “Birthplace of the President of the United States.”

    Alan is such a decent guy.
    Me on the other hand, would of had little patience with this has been, believing in some stranger in Africa than accepting the word of state officials.
    Pat, Nigeria has several princes who need a few extra dollars to get to their rightful inheritance, you will be rewarded handsomely.
    Pit-t-ful

  14. Jim Valley June 26th, 2014 at 08:40

    This guy is as crazy as all the others.

  15. Jim Valley June 26th, 2014 at 08:40

    This guy is as crazy as all the others.

  16. Eric Meckes June 26th, 2014 at 11:13

    What’s so crazy is not that there are so many raving Koolaid drinking Obama-Loving crack sniffers, what’s totally crazy is that even when you put visible evidence in front of their face, they still REFUSE to acknowledge that AKA Barry Soetoro is a fraud of the highest order. Back when it became appearant that George Bush was breaking with the Constitution, even his Republican base turned against him because even though they hated to admit it, the evidence was clear, and much less clear than this evidence. That’s why Bush ended his reign in the sub 20% range. But the Liberals just can’t admit that Soetoro/Obama is a fraud no matter how much evidence is produced. I’m no birther and never have been, but I’ve been in computer graphics for many years and I can say with 100% certainty based on opening the document myself in illustrator that this supposed document was NEVER a real document at all, but a digitally created forgery. If it were a copy of a real 1961 Birth Certificate, it would be one single layer, you wouldn’t be able to lift and move the Signature Stamp and State Seal completely off the page as separate layers, it would be ink embedded in the original 1961 paper document. These two items are meant to authenticate the entire document. They didn’t even have photoshop or illustrator back in 1961. It wouldn’t be caused by scanning or an OCR because if you use your brain you would know that a COPY is just that, a single layered copy period. So you liberals keep on defending this liar, but at the end of the day, his lawless destruction of America will affect you just as much as the rest of us. No need for name calling, if you were a professional mechanic and someone said your engine was not original, you would go to a professional in order to verify, but you wouldn’t call him a whacko for stating his professional opinion, same here, I’m not a birther, just a professional advertising person who has used computer graphics for 3 decades. I never believed any of it back when it started, but a friend approached me knowing my computer background and begged for me to look at it, I said “if you promise to never bring it up again I will” so I did and I thought it would turn out real and that it would shut my friend up, but when I opened it, I knew within 5 Seconds it was fake. Be Your own judge, but judge on the facts, not on your emotions. If you don’t care that your President is a lying fraud, so be it, but calling others names just because you don’t want to see or admit the truth based on factual hard evidence is ridiculous.

    • Dave B. June 26th, 2014 at 13:14

      Why are you so ashamed of being a birther?
      All that nonsense about the digital image of the birth certificate is just a way to make technically unsophisticated persons like yourself– OBVIOUSLY technically unsophisticated persons like yourself– think they’re superduper junior forensic investigators. It has absolutely NO significance as evidence of forgery.

    • smrstrauss June 26th, 2014 at 16:26

      Re: ” I can say with 100% certainty based on downloading and opening the
      document myself in illustrator that this supposed document was NEVER a
      real document at all, but a digitally created forgery.”

      Answer: Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      And as for other “anomalies”:

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

    • PlacidAir June 26th, 2014 at 17:24

      Your revisionist history would be amusing if it weren’t so dangerous.

    • Grigori Som June 26th, 2014 at 18:06

      Ever heard of paragraphs?

    • William Carr June 26th, 2014 at 18:40

      You are MENTALLY ILL.

      The original paper Long-Form Birth Certificate was bound into a volume and kept in the Hawaiian Archives.

      The Hawaiian official in charge of their Health Department, Loretta Fuddy, verified the digital copy matches the paper copy.

      “They didn’t even have photoshop or illustrator back in 1961″

      You pitiful fool.

      The scan was done of the paper original, at the request of Barack Obama, in THIS Century !

      The Hawaiian Archivist is NOT going to cut the original document out of the 1961 Archival book.

      But they laid it on a scanner and digitized it as a PDF.

      That created a vector-based file.

      If you open it in Acrobat, there won’t be any layers because Acrobat is designed to view PDF files correctly.

      But opening a PDF in Illustrator explains the layering perfectly.

      After all, it’s not a native .ai file, it’s PDF. So the conversion process creates layers.

      If you WERE experienced at all in Computer Graphics you’d realize this.

      Face it, you ARE a Birther.

      You’re just one of the second-generation Birthers that pretends to know something about Computer Graphics.

      You started off as a narrow-minded Bigot, and you went in search of something to validate your Bigotry.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

      Your rant is so familiar… it sounds like a copy/paste job from InfoWars or The Blaze.

      • Susan Wood June 27th, 2014 at 08:13

        Isn’t it hilarious (in a depressing sort of way) to listen to these rank amateurs pose as document experts, trying to analyze a document they’ve never seen in person? When Karl Rove planted that fake memo to try to discredit Dan Rather (knowing full well that Rather had a hefty stack of absolutely valid evidence about Bush’s failure to fulfill his cushy draft-evading National Guard stint) he didn’t know what a plague he was unleashing. Now every high school dropout thinks he can analyze paperwork he’s never seen except in digital reproduction. Well, it keeps them off the streets I guess.

      • smrstrauss June 27th, 2014 at 11:35

        Actually it is slightly more complicated. The original long form was photocopied onto security paper and the current seal and signature affixed to it, and two paper copies were given to Obama’s lawyer who took them to Washington. It was the White House that put one of those paper copies on a scanner and created the PDF image that was put online by the White House. There are also images of the black and white copies of Obama’s long form, which were made by the AP using the black and while photocopies of the two documents from Hawaii (the White House passed the two official documents around, but then they had to be handed back; the press got to keep the photocopies), and there is a jpg image of one of the two originals made by the cell phone of NBC correspondent Savannah Gutherie, who also stated that she had “felt the seal.”

        And not only Fuddy but Fukino and Onaka also stated that they had seen the birth certificate in the files in Hawaii, and in court papers they also stated that all the facts on the long form put online by the White House are exactly the same—that they MATCH—the facts on the copies in the files.

        Oh, and the White House pdf images were generated using a Xerox WorkCentre station, which created most of the “anomalies” that birthers comment about. (Multiple layers are generated automatically when a complex document scanned into PDF is opened in Illustrator). Here is the Xerox WorkCentre research:

        http://www.obamaconspiracy.org

      • jezebel June 29th, 2014 at 20:45

        #LOL I love you William :)

    • jezebel June 29th, 2014 at 20:46

      Good grief how do you kooks have jobs? HOW?!? I DEMAND TO KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU DO!

    • smrstrauss October 3rd, 2014 at 14:28

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

  17. Eric Meckes June 26th, 2014 at 11:13

    What’s so crazy is not that there are so many raving Obama lovers, what is totally crazy is that even when you put visible evidence in front of their face, they still REFUSE to acknowledge that AKA Barry Soetoro is a fraud of the highest order. Back when it became appearant that George Bush was breaking with the Constitution, even his Republican base turned against him because even though they hated to admit it, the evidence was clear, and much less clear than this evidence. That’s why Bush ended his reign in the sub 20% range. But the Liberals just can’t admit that Soetoro/Obama is a fraud no matter how much evidence is produced. I’m no birther and never have been, but I’ve been in computer graphics for many years and I can say with 100% certainty based on downloading and opening the document myself in illustrator that this supposed document was NEVER a real document at all, but a digitally created forgery. If it were a copy of a real 1961 Birth Certificate, it would be one single layer, you wouldn’t be able to lift and move the Signature Stamp and State Seal completely off the page as separate layers, it would be ink embedded in the original 1961 paper document. These two items are meant to authenticate the entire document. They didn’t even have photoshop or illustrator back in 1961. It wouldn’t be caused by scanning or an OCR because if you use your brain you would know that a COPY is just that, a single layered copy period. So you liberals keep on defending this liar, but at the end of the day, his lawless destruction of America will affect you just as much as the rest of us. No need for name calling, if someone told you that your engine in your car was not original, you would go to a professional in order to verify, but you wouldn’t call him a whacko for stating his professional opinion, same here, I’m not a birther, just a professional advertising person who has used computer graphics for 3 decades. I never believed any of it back when it started, but a friend approached me knowing my computer graphics background and begged for me to look at it, I said “if you promise to never bring it up again I will” so I did and I thought it would turn out real and that it would shut my friend up, but when I opened it, I knew within 5 Seconds it was fake. Be Your own judge, but judge on the facts, not on your emotions. If you don’t care that your President is a lying fraud, so be it, but calling others names just because you don’t want to see or admit the truth based on factual hard evidence is ridiculous. And as for the birth announcements in the paper, Alan ALWAYS brings that up as proof of OBAMA’S birth, but it’s not proof of anything. And even if these announcements were authentic, it has NOTHING to do with the fact that this document is fake. The real question people should be asking is, if the birth announcements are authentic, WHY did he have to produce this fake birth certificate ???

    • Dave B. June 26th, 2014 at 13:14

      Why are you so ashamed of being a birther?
      All that nonsense about the digital image of the birth certificate is just a way to make technically unsophisticated persons like yourself– OBVIOUSLY technically unsophisticated persons like yourself– think they’re superduper junior forensic investigators. It has absolutely NO significance as evidence of forgery.

    • smrstrauss June 26th, 2014 at 16:26

      Re: ” I can say with 100% certainty based on downloading and opening the
      document myself in illustrator that this supposed document was NEVER a
      real document at all, but a digitally created forgery.”

      Answer: Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      And as for other “anomalies”:

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

    • PlacidAir June 26th, 2014 at 17:24

      Your revisionist history would be amusing if it weren’t so dangerous.

    • Grigori Som June 26th, 2014 at 18:06

      Ever heard of paragraphs?

    • William Carr June 26th, 2014 at 18:40

      You are MENTALLY ILL.

      The original paper Long-Form Birth Certificate was bound into a volume and kept in the Hawaiian Archives.

      The Hawaiian official in charge of their Health Department, Loretta Fuddy, verified the digital copy matches the paper copy.

      “They didn’t even have photoshop or illustrator back in 1961″

      You pitiful fool.

      The scan was done of the paper original, at the request of Barack Obama, in THIS Century !

      The Hawaiian Archivist is NOT going to cut the original document out of the 1961 Archival book.

      But they laid it on a scanner and digitized it as a PDF.

      That created a vector-based file.

      If you open it in Acrobat, there won’t be any layers because Acrobat is designed to view PDF files correctly.

      But opening a PDF in Illustrator explains the layering perfectly.

      After all, it’s not a native .ai file, it’s PDF. So the conversion process creates layers.

      If you WERE experienced at all in Computer Graphics you’d realize this.

      Face it, you ARE a Birther.

      You’re just one of the second-generation Birthers that pretends to know something about Computer Graphics.

      You started off as a narrow-minded Bigot, and you went in search of something to validate your Bigotry.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g

      Your rant is so familiar… it sounds like a copy/paste job from InfoWars or The Blaze.

      • Susan Wood June 27th, 2014 at 08:13

        Isn’t it hilarious (in a depressing sort of way) to listen to these rank amateurs pose as document experts, trying to analyze a document they’ve never seen in person? When Karl Rove planted that fake memo to try to discredit Dan Rather (knowing full well that Rather had a hefty stack of absolutely valid evidence about Bush’s failure to fulfill his cushy draft-evading National Guard stint) he didn’t know what a plague he was unleashing. Now every high school dropout thinks he can analyze paperwork he’s never seen except in digital reproduction. Well, it keeps them off the streets I guess.

      • smrstrauss June 27th, 2014 at 11:35

        Actually it is slightly more complicated. The original long form was photocopied onto security paper and the current seal and signature affixed to it, and two paper copies were given to Obama’s lawyer who took them to Washington. It was the White House that put one of those paper copies on a scanner and created the PDF image that was put online by the White House. There are also images of the black and white copies of Obama’s long form, which were made by the AP using the black and while photocopies of the two documents from Hawaii (the White House passed the two official documents around, but then they had to be handed back; the press got to keep the photocopies), and there is a jpg image of one of the two originals made by the cell phone of NBC correspondent Savannah Gutherie, who also stated that she had “felt the seal.”

        And not only Fuddy but Fukino and Onaka also stated that they had seen the birth certificate in the files in Hawaii, and in court papers they also stated that all the facts on the long form put online by the White House are exactly the same—that they MATCH—the facts on the copies in the files.

        Oh, and the White House pdf images were generated using a Xerox WorkCentre station, which created most of the “anomalies” that birthers comment about. (Multiple layers are generated automatically when a complex document scanned into PDF is opened in Illustrator). Here is the Xerox WorkCentre research:

        http://www.obamaconspiracy.org

      • jezebel June 29th, 2014 at 20:45

        #LOL I love you William :)

    • jezebel June 29th, 2014 at 20:46

      Good grief how do you kooks have jobs? HOW?!? I DEMAND TO KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU DO!

    • smrstrauss October 3rd, 2014 at 14:28

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

  18. Shades June 26th, 2014 at 11:43

    Sheesh, another crazy forged-bc, I’m a graphics expert because of a jail break on photoshop download I did back in the 90s, who thinks he can BS the community … and it’s not even a full moon.

  19. Shades June 26th, 2014 at 11:43

    Sheesh, another crazy forged-bc, I’m a graphics expert because of a jail break on photoshop download I did back in the 90s, who thinks he can BS the community … and it’s not even a full moon.

  20. PlacidAir June 26th, 2014 at 17:23

    Good grief, a lack of a plaque in a hospital — THAT is his “proof”? And since when are the imaginative ravings of a lunatic a “bombshell”? What a freaking nutjob.

1 2 3 4 5

Leave a Reply