On Thursday’s Radio Show…

Posted by | June 19, 2014 07:00 | Filed under: Radio Show

Republish
Reprint


• Growing up with Dr. Dyer. Ever wonder what life would be like if Dr. Wayne Dyer was your father? His daughter, Serena Dyer, details growing up with spiritual parents.

• Why is Bunny Ranch mogul Dennis Hof suing the city of Oakland? He will detail his lawsuit after the city took down his billboard.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Liberaland
By: Mary Rydzeski

2 responses to On Thursday’s Radio Show…

  1. Tom Ward June 19th, 2014 at 17:02

    US gov making my skin crawl:

    “Chinese site in signal-jammer sting could pay record $34.9M FCC fine”
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/2365780/chinese-site-in-signaljammer-sting-could-pay-record-349m-fcc-fine.html

    “The agency also ordered CTS, based in Shenzhen, China, to stop marketing illegal jammers to U.S. consumers and identify the buyer of each jammer it sold in the U.S.”

    This is the part that makes my skin crawl: “identify the buyer of each jammer it sold in the U.S.”

    #1 The FCC does not have jurisdiction over companies in China. Sorry, FCC.
    #2 I almost bought one of these puppies a year or 2 ago. Almost. If I wanted to use such a device in a legal manner, off on the wilderness on my own property, for reasons that only pertain to me and no one else, then that is my own mother f***ing business. If I use it in an illegal manner, then I go to jail. But don’t target me for buying such a device just because you assume the only way it can be used is in an illegal manner. UGHHH, US government, just ugh.

  2. Tom Ward June 19th, 2014 at 17:02

    US gov making my skin crawl:

    “Chinese site in signal-jammer sting could pay record $34.9M FCC fine”
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/2365780/chinese-site-in-signaljammer-sting-could-pay-record-349m-fcc-fine.html

    “The agency also ordered CTS, based in Shenzhen, China, to stop marketing illegal jammers to U.S. consumers and identify the buyer of each jammer it sold in the U.S.”

    This is the part that makes my skin crawl: “identify the buyer of each jammer it sold in the U.S.”

    #1 The FCC does not have jurisdiction over companies in China. Sorry, FCC.
    #2 I almost bought one of these puppies a year or 2 ago. Almost. If I wanted to use such a device in a legal manner, off on the wilderness on my own property, for reasons that only pertain to me and no one else, then that is my own mother f***ing business. If I use it in an illegal manner, then I go to jail. But don’t target me for buying such a device just because you assume the only way it can be used is in an illegal manner. UGHHH, US government, just ugh.

Leave a Reply