Mike Vanderboegh Still Thinks There’s A Good Chance Harry Reid’s ‘Balls’ Will Be ‘Ripped Off’
Mike Vanderboegh was on radio Wednesday night declaring that a civil war is likely and that Harry Reid wants violence. Vanerboegh compared Cliven Bundy to Dred Scott, defending his law-breaking. And he doubled down on previous comments that bricks should be thrown through windows of local Democratic offices to “send a message.”
Click here for reuse options!Copyright 2014 Liberaland
Budda May 8th, 2014 at 09:40
This clown wants to start a civil war. Reid wants to have the law enforced…big difference.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:14
They need to be extra careful what they wish for. They certainly do know their audience though. Red neck idiots can be counted on to take the rock and run with it because some fool tells them to.
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 12:39
They’re always right on the verge of being a violent mob.
Chinese Democracy May 8th, 2014 at 13:22
they gotta blame Reid for something anything. The rightwing machine including the NRA have these guys so paranoid its a little dangerous . Think Murrah Federal bldg
Budda May 8th, 2014 at 09:40
This clown wants to start a civil war. Reid wants to have the law enforced…big difference.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:14
They need to be extra careful what they wish for. They certainly do know their audience though. Red neck idiots can be counted on to take the rock and run with it because some fool tells them to.
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 12:39
They’re always right on the verge of being a violent mob.
Chinese Democracy May 8th, 2014 at 13:22
they gotta blame Reid for something anything. The rightwing machine including the NRA have these guys so paranoid its a little dangerous . Think Murrah Federal bldg
William May 8th, 2014 at 09:45
bricks should be thrown through windows of local Democratic offices to “send a message.”
I assume he attended to the Earnest T. Bass school of political science.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:13
I hope a lot of them actually do start throwing rocks … it’s a good way to get them in jail for destruction of property.
I loved Ernest T Bass .. he was a brilliant man.
Chinese Democracy May 8th, 2014 at 13:17
lol .. I stole that gif
William May 8th, 2014 at 09:45
bricks should be thrown through windows of local Democratic offices to “send a message.”
I assume he attended to the Earnest T. Bass school of political science.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:13
I hope a lot of them actually do start throwing rocks … it’s a good way to get them in jail for destruction of property.
I loved Ernest T Bass .. he was a brilliant man.
Chinese Democracy May 8th, 2014 at 13:17
lol .. I stole that gif
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 10:20
of course, if someone who participated in the Occupy protests a few years ago, went on the radio and accused a Republican of trying to start a civil war, we all know how the talk radio/FOX news audience would have responded.
as always, right wingers scream loudest when they are treated the way, they want to treat everyone else.
once upon a time, in a land far far away, a long, long time ago (about 3 years), Republicans and their constituents pretended to support law and order. whether it was two black guys exercising their 2nd amendment rights in front of a polling place, or a liberal movement exercising their first amendment rights, Republicans were oh so concerned about following the law.
now that gun-toting right wing thugs are the criminals, who cares about the law.
here is how one prominent Republican referred to his fellow citizens exercising their first amendment rights back in 2011 before the Sith lords controlling the GOP finally revealed themselves. who knows what he would have said if the Occupy protesters were exercising their second amendment rights too.
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2011/10/07/8206043-cantor-says-hes-concerned-by-mobs-at-occupy-wall-street
Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor addresses the Value Voters Summit in Washington, DC, Friday. The Value Voters Summit, sponsored by the Family Research Council, is an annual gathering of the religious right; it provides Republican politicians and presidential candidates an opportunity to display their conservative bona fides.
The second-ranking House Republican castigated “Occupy Wall Street” protesters on Friday, just as Democrats begin cozying up to the weeks-old demonstrations.
House GOP Leader Eric Cantor decried the protests that started several weeks ago in New York, and have spread to major cities across the country. Cantor said in a speech at the Values Voters Summit in Washington that he is “increasingly concerned” about the “growing mobs” represented at the protests.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:12
I have always believed that the RWNJ’s all had major toilet training issues. Instead of pooping their pants, they are now pooping all over the country, which belongs to all of us.
That’s the difference … liberal left is inclusive.
Tighty whities are exclusive.
Fortunately the liberal left wants to never ever be a party with these jerks.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 10:20
of course, if someone who participated in the Occupy protests a few years ago, went on the radio and accused a Republican of trying to start a civil war, we all know how the talk radio/FOX news audience would have responded.
as always, right wingers scream loudest when they are treated the way, they want to treat everyone else.
once upon a time, in a land far far away, a long, long time ago (about 3 years), Republicans and their constituents pretended to support law and order. whether it was two black guys exercising their 2nd amendment rights in front of a polling place, or a liberal movement exercising their first amendment rights, Republicans were oh so concerned about following the law.
now that gun-toting right wing thugs are the criminals, who cares about the law.
here is how one prominent Republican referred to his fellow citizens exercising their first amendment rights back in 2011 before the Sith lords controlling the GOP finally revealed themselves. who knows what he would have said if the Occupy protesters were exercising their second amendment rights too.
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2011/10/07/8206043-cantor-says-hes-concerned-by-mobs-at-occupy-wall-street
Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor addresses the Value Voters Summit in Washington, DC, Friday. The Value Voters Summit, sponsored by the Family Research Council, is an annual gathering of the religious right; it provides Republican politicians and presidential candidates an opportunity to display their conservative bona fides.
The second-ranking House Republican castigated “Occupy Wall Street” protesters on Friday, just as Democrats begin cozying up to the weeks-old demonstrations.
House GOP Leader Eric Cantor decried the protests that started several weeks ago in New York, and have spread to major cities across the country. Cantor said in a speech at the Values Voters Summit in Washington that he is “increasingly concerned” about the “growing mobs” represented at the protests.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:12
I have always believed that the RWNJ’s all had major toilet training issues. Instead of pooping their pants, they are now pooping all over the country, which belongs to all of us.
That’s the difference … liberal left is inclusive.
Tighty whities are exclusive.
Fortunately the liberal left wants to never ever be a party with these jerks.
absolute truth May 8th, 2014 at 11:00
just a test entry to confirm my log in with this new system. Hello to all on LL.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:10
Hi back!
Chinese Democracy May 8th, 2014 at 13:16
it didnt work ..I dont see a thing :)
absolute truth May 8th, 2014 at 11:00
just a test entry to confirm my log in with this new system. Hello to all on LL.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:10
Hi back!
Chinese Democracy May 8th, 2014 at 13:16
it didnt work ..I dont see a thing :)
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:10
Nothing says “strength of position” like threatening violence to try and get your own way. Unfortunately the media is reporting on him, so it is unlikely he will shut up anytime soon.
aceofwands May 9th, 2014 at 01:12
“Nothing says “strength of position” like threatening violence to try and get your own way.”
A tactic utilized by the left on a regular basis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A1wTE3OzTE
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 18:54
since when are anarchists from the LEFT? If anything they are t baggerish
aceofwands May 10th, 2014 at 01:02
Yeah…even the anarchists in the Youtube comments are upset by
their behavior and identify them as lefties thinking they are
anarchists.
“t baggerish”…that’s funny, sounds like you have a mouth full…are you out bagging tonight?
Chinese Democracy May 10th, 2014 at 02:49
are u asking me on a date?
Yeah.. T baggers and anarchists pretty much have the same anti / no gov beliefs
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 11:10
Nothing says “strength of position” like threatening violence to try and get your own way. Unfortunately the media is reporting on him, so it is unlikely he will shut up anytime soon.
aceofwands May 9th, 2014 at 01:12
“Nothing says “strength of position” like threatening violence to try and get your own way.”
A tactic utilized by the left on a regular basis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A1wTE3OzTE
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 18:54
since when are anarchists from the LEFT? If anything they are t baggerish
aceofwands May 10th, 2014 at 01:02
Yeah…even the anarchists in the Youtube comments are upset by
their behavior and identify them as lefties thinking they are
anarchists.
“t baggerish”…that’s funny, sounds like you have a mouth full…are you out bagging tonight?
Chinese Democracy May 10th, 2014 at 02:49
are u asking me on a date?
Yeah.. T baggers and anarchists pretty much have the same anti / no gov beliefs
Dwendt44 May 8th, 2014 at 11:45
Stealing is wrong unless you are stealing from the government.
Dwendt44 May 8th, 2014 at 11:45
Stealing is wrong unless you are stealing from the government.
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 12:32
How is this not incitement to riot? And what is it with these guys and balls? Especially OTHER men’s balls?
CzarChasmIII May 8th, 2014 at 22:04
When Mr. Vanderboegh mentioned another man’s balls, it was while relating a metaphor that his salt-of-the-Earth grandfather told him at 10 years old about why he wouldn’t return to the house at Mike’s urging to continue an argument his granddad was having with his grandmother. After encouraging his grandfather to go back because Mike thought he had the “winning” argument, his granddad bent down to Mike’s level and said, paraphrasing, “Son, you don’t poke a wolverine with a sharp stick unless you want your balls ripped off!”
Men are particularly well-suited to understand unstated meanings of a metaphor about balls, either their own or others’, it makes no difference.
I only heard half the interview, so I don’t know if Mike was given a chance to repeat that story or not, but it was an attempt at a warning of the unintended consequences of turning our free republic into a tyrannical, despotic state. Harry Reid called the participants of a peaceful protest that made the BLM back down from firing the first shot of the next civil war “domestic terrorists,” yet what inspired those people to go there were four separate sniper nests trained on the Bundy family, plus another ~200 heavily armed agents who threw Cliven Bundy’s sister to the dirt, tased one of his sons multiple times in quick succession, and assaulted a pregnant woman, all caught on video and disseminated to a shocked public over an unpaid grazing fees bill. The despotism in those acts puts Mike’s warning of unintended consequences in easy-to-understand context of a poke with a sharp stick causing a wolverine to rip somebody’s balls off. The wolverine is not the sister, the son or the pregnant woman, the wolverine is our liberty. If government, whether from the right or the left, keeps poking that stick at our liberties, more than a few balls will be ripped off.
The only reason anyone on a progressive website would have to disagree with Mike Vanderboegh’s metaphor is if you have designs on our liberties. Assuming that isn’t true, then we have no issues. But if it is true, as Bunkerville proved to at least some degree, we are ready, willing, able, armed, prepared and righteously indignant to rip their balls off when our government forgets its place. No one will be immune from the unintended consequences of taking it to the next step. We aren’t your enemies. We are the protectors of liberty. We want you to live any way you choose. The only caveat is that your choices cannot infringe on anyone else’s choices of how to live. Obviously, snipers surrounding American families is a bit more infringement than we’re willing to allow.
I tried to answer your question honestly and politely, but also directly. I hope it enures to some degree of understanding rather than being taken as threatening or angry or dismissive of your concerns. We simply adhere to the law and try to predict it as best we can. The Law of Unintended Consequences is very unpredictable though, so it’s incumbent upon serious people to talk seriously with each other.
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:38
Oh pulleze…
CzarChasmIII May 9th, 2014 at 00:19
OK, so check your name off the list of serious people. And place a check next to your name on the list of people who believe that the “American Way” is now sending a paramilitary force to collect an unpaid bill.
Excuse me for mistaking you for a thoughtful, reasonable person. I assure you, it won’t happen again.
M D Reese May 9th, 2014 at 00:42
Thanks for the belly laugh!
tayronachan May 12th, 2014 at 22:47
Well said, and I agree.
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 12:32
How is this not incitement to riot? And what is it with these guys and balls? Especially OTHER men’s balls?
CzarChasmIII May 8th, 2014 at 22:04
When Mr. Vanderboegh mentioned another man’s balls, it was while relating a metaphor that his salt-of-the-Earth grandfather told him at 10 years old about why he wouldn’t return to the house at Mike’s urging to continue an argument his granddad was having with his grandmother. After encouraging his grandfather to go back because Mike thought he had the “winning” argument, his granddad bent down to Mike’s level and said, paraphrasing, “Son, you don’t poke a wolverine with a sharp stick unless you want your balls ripped off!”
Men are particularly well-suited to understand unstated meanings of a metaphor about balls, either their own or others’, it makes no difference.
I only heard half the interview, so I don’t know if Mike was given a chance to repeat that story or not, but it was an attempt at a warning of the unintended consequences of turning our free republic into a tyrannical, despotic state. Harry Reid called the participants of a peaceful protest that made the BLM back down from firing the first shot of the next civil war “domestic terrorists,” yet what inspired those people to go there were four separate sniper nests trained on the Bundy family, plus another ~200 heavily armed agents who threw Cliven Bundy’s sister to the dirt, tased one of his sons multiple times in quick succession, and assaulted a pregnant woman, all caught on video and disseminated to a shocked public over an unpaid grazing fees bill. The despotism in those acts puts Mike’s warning of unintended consequences in easy-to-understand context of a poke with a sharp stick causing a wolverine to rip somebody’s balls off. The wolverine is not the sister, the son or the pregnant woman, the wolverine is our liberty. If government, whether from the right or the left, keeps poking that stick at our liberties, more than a few balls will be ripped off.
The only reason anyone on a progressive website would have to disagree with Mike Vanderboegh’s metaphor is if you have designs on our liberties. Assuming that isn’t true, then we have no issues. But if it is true, as Bunkerville proved to at least some degree, we are ready, willing, able, armed, prepared and righteously indignant to rip their balls off when our government forgets its place. No one will be immune from the unintended consequences of taking it to the next step. We aren’t your enemies. We are the protectors of liberty. We want you to live any way you choose. The only caveat is that your choices cannot infringe on anyone else’s choices of how to live. Obviously, snipers surrounding American families is a bit more infringement than we’re willing to allow.
I tried to answer your question honestly and politely, but also directly. I hope it enures to some degree of understanding rather than being taken as threatening or angry or dismissive of your concerns. We simply adhere to the law and try to predict it as best we can. The Law of Unintended Consequences is very unpredictable though, so it’s incumbent upon serious people to talk seriously with each other.
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:38
Oh pulleze…
CzarChasmIII May 9th, 2014 at 00:19
OK, so check your name off the list of serious people. And place a check next to your name on the list of people who believe that the “American Way” is now sending a paramilitary force to collect an unpaid bill.
Excuse me for mistaking you for a thoughtful, reasonable person. I assure you, it won’t happen again.
M D Reese May 9th, 2014 at 00:42
Thanks for the belly laugh!
tayronachan May 12th, 2014 at 22:47
Well said, and I agree.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 14:08
To emphasize my earlier point, who wants to bet that the right wing media and politicians will express the same level of outrage over this incident as they did with two black guys standing in front of a polling place in a predominately black neighborhood, exercising their second amendment rights and holding doors open for women.
I will take that bet.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57917374-78/wrangler-blm-reid-pickup.html.csp
With anti-government sentiments roiling in the aftermath of Cliven Bundy’s Nevada standoff, government workers in western Utah are stripping BLM logos from their vehicles after two motorists brandished a gun and displayed a threatening sign at a federal wrangler who was driving Tuesday in Juab County.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:19
That would be anti-BIG, UNCONSTITUTIONAL government sentiments. Most folks I know are not against government entirely; only the bloated, constitution-shredding government given us by leftists of BOTH halves of the ruling big government party. That includes BOTH R’s and D’s. The best president we’ve had since Jefferaon was “Silent Cal” Coolidge, back in the 1920s. Under him, the debt was reduced, spending was cut and the (quite real) depression of 1920 died a’borning. Now that’s REAL accomplishment!!!
D.C. Wright
USMC Retired
Constitutional Restorationist
III/OK
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:11
The presidency of Calvin Coolidge was from August 1923 until March 1929.
Wall Street crashed November 1929.
Want to try again? According to you, the depression died in 1920.
Facts Mr. Wright … you are even wrong about the Fall of Wall Street and the Great Depression.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:25
Tho Depression that Herbert Hoover and FDR ran into the ground started in 1929, true enough. The depression of 1920-21 is the one that Coolidge had a hand in eradicating. See http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-depression-youve-never-heard-of-1920-1921 for details
aceofwands May 9th, 2014 at 01:16
They sure do take the bait when properly prodded.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 14:08
To emphasize my earlier point, who wants to bet that the right wing media and politicians will express the same level of outrage over this incident as they did with two black guys standing in front of a polling place in a predominately black neighborhood, exercising their second amendment rights and holding doors open for women.
I will take that bet.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57917374-78/wrangler-blm-reid-pickup.html.csp
With anti-government sentiments roiling in the aftermath of Cliven Bundy’s Nevada standoff, government workers in western Utah are stripping BLM logos from their vehicles after two motorists brandished a gun and displayed a threatening sign at a federal wrangler who was driving Tuesday in Juab County.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:19
That would be anti-BIG, UNCONSTITUTIONAL government sentiments. Most folks I know are not against government entirely; only the bloated, constitution-shredding government given us by leftists of BOTH halves of the ruling big government party. That includes BOTH R’s and D’s. The best president we’ve had since Jefferaon was “Silent Cal” Coolidge, back in the 1920s. Under him, the debt was reduced, spending was cut and the (quite real) depression of 1920 died a’borning. Now that’s REAL accomplishment!!!
D.C. Wright
USMC Retired
Constitutional Restorationist
III/OK
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:11
The presidency of Calvin Coolidge was from August 1923 until March 1929.
Wall Street crashed November 1929.
Want to try again? According to you, the depression died in 1920.
Facts Mr. Wright … you are even wrong about the Fall of Wall Street and the Great Depression.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:25
Tho Depression that Herbert Hoover and FDR ran into the ground started in 1929, true enough. The depression of 1920-21 is the one that Coolidge had a hand in eradicating. See http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/the-depression-youve-never-heard-of-1920-1921 for details
aceofwands May 9th, 2014 at 01:16
They sure do take the bait when properly prodded.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:09
Since there seems to be pretty strong evidence (I would call it conclusive, but Ballless Hairy Reid’s a progressive liberal democrat) that Ballless Hairy Reid owns over 90 acres in close proximity to Mr. Bundy’s ranch and wants a bigger parcel (Mr. Bundy’s land) to sell to Chinese interests, that would indicate that Ballless Hairy Reid WOULD send violent men to wreak havoc on Mr. Bundy, absent the Oath Keepers and militia men and women currently stationed there.
And the evidence has been presented on numerous websites AND documented. Sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com has links to much of it. I know y’all are leftwing rant kings and queens, not much given to the Founders,civility, the Constitution (as the contract which We, the People, entered into with the Several States, which created Fedgov and granted it certain LAID-OUT and LIMITED powers to act on, as an agent of the States and the People), or even simple truths, but perhaps if I try to use small words, even YOU might understand what’s at stake here.
D.C. Wright
USMC Retired
Constitutional Restorationist
III/OK
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 19:19
you talk about not being given to civility and you use terms like “ballless” and make condescending statements about small words.
your post is a perfect paradigm of cognitive dissonance.
I will defend my beliefs and opinions in Constitutional terms anytime.
a blog is not an objective source of information. would you accept this blog as an irrefutable source of information? when your “proof” appears in the Wall St Journal, let me know.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:26
I only echo the tone I see in many other posters here and on other “tolerant” leftist sites. In that, I am a mirror of what I see, saving for foul language.
As to blogs, no, but the links and cites are on Sipsey Street, for anyone’s perusal. I also did listen to the entire audio of Alan’s conversation with Mike. So I take his comments with a LARGE grain of salt.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 19:30
at least at this site, opposing viewpoints are presented. try doing the same thing at a right wing site where you disagree with the views of the publisher, and see how quickly your account is terminated. you likely will not need a calendar to measure the interval. a stopwatch will probably be sufficient.
so before you go putting tolerant in quotation marks, why not take a look at your own side of the political aisle and see what intolerance really looks like, no quotation marks necessary
http://www.redstate.com/posting-rules/
13. The dissemination of talking points from the Democrat Party, or its politicians and allies, is not allowed
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:35
Redstate is not on my list to visit, never has been. As to tolerance, look at DU and most of the other leftie sites. This is a model of what COULD be, in comparison. Of course when you and your choir use terms like RWNJ and similar derogatory terms, expect that I, at least, will fire back kind for kind. Ya gotta give to get. Cool?
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 19:42
I am not a member of any choir. My point is that regardless of what sites you frequent, I see no reason why this or any other leftist site needs to adhere to a standard that is not only absent from right wing sites, but in some cases written into the rules.
Personally, I give the level of respect that I receive. Having said that, after 5 years of noise about forged birth certificates, secret Muslims, death panels, socialism, child re-education camps and so-called strict constructionists advocating denial of article 6 and first amendment rights to Muslims, I fail to see how anyone who holds those views is not deserving of the label RWNJ.
I respect you and your beliefs to the same extent you respect me and my beliefs.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:59
Your beliefs are what they are. When you try to grow government to IMPLEMENT them, we’ll have some serious issues. MY beliefs treat Americans as grownups and SHRINK government to its Constitutional limits, leaving you to live your beliefs without impacting others who are not so minded.
Stop trying to get government involved in every aspect of other folks’ lives and we’ll have NO problems, OK?
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:06
Really? You apparently are trying to tell us how to live and what to believe – based upon??? You say you speak for veterans? I call bullsh*t. You do not have the ability to speak for veterans – they can very well speak for themselves. And they do.
“Stop trying to get government involved in every aspect of other folks’ lives and we’ll have NO problems, OK?”
Careful now … that sounds a bit threatening doesn’t it? Kind of like “shut up or I’ll shut you up”? Is your mouth writing checks your body can’t cash?
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:13
Oh, perish forbid that I would EVER tell you and yours what to believe. It’s only when you try to force YOUR beliefs on others THROUGH GOVERNMENT that we have “issues.” Your right to believe is guaranteed (but not GRANTED) by the First Amendment. You possess it by reason of being human.
I would never even WANT to shut you up. I might ridicule you, but that’s OK. You see, I have renounced the INITIATION of force and would give you the first shot. BUT I WILL shoot back. Guaranteed.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:22
Mr. Wright how am I forcing my views onto you? You have free choice to visit or not visit blogs that disagree with you. That is your right.
I would never tell you to shut up either.
It is important that people see what you think and how you feel, in order to form an opinion of you. We can only judge you based upon how you present yourself.
I have already proven you are wrong about Calvin Coolidge based upon your post below. Accuracy is important – and when you are seriously incorrect with facts, it doesn’t drive your point home. A simple Google would have told you the accurate dates for the Coolidge Presidency and the Fall of Wall Street. As it was, you made a big point that was completely wrong.
I can call you out when you are wrong with facts which you just were.
And I can and will call you out when you attempt to link your views with veterans in general. You really do not have a right to speak for others.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:26
Read my response below before congratulating yourself.
tayronachan May 10th, 2014 at 02:24
DW, check out theburningplatform blog by James Quinn, The Fourth Turning.
William May 12th, 2014 at 22:20
“When you try to grow government to IMPLEMENT “…
Bad news cupcake. The last republican president increased the government payroll by over 3/4 of a million employees. This president has shrunk the government parole by 2/3 of a million. Time to get new Limbaugh bumper sticker eh?
Shades May 8th, 2014 at 19:55
Here’s an idea DW. Why don’t you start your own blog and set your own rules, instead of telling other people to do it your way? If you don’t like it here, don’t let the door hit ya …
Chinese Democracy May 10th, 2014 at 02:46
I want to go to there
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:57
So far all you have is “I don’t go there” …
In other words, no one else listens to you either?
dert connaly May 8th, 2014 at 21:29
I can’t verify what you say about account terminations for comments on the Right blogs but I do see I lot of vicious stuff coming from the liberal posts. I’ve got no problem with that since the 1st applies to everyone. However, I’ve got to say this is the 1st liberal blog I’ve commented on where my comment wasn’t pending.
Good for you Alan. Maybe S.H. gave you some good tips ;)
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 21:36
I provided a link to redstate’s posting rules so I do not see what else there is to verify. the words “not allowed” are pretty darn clear. If you want to see an example of “vicious” posts, go over to redstate, create an account and in the most civil, intelligent manner you can muster, say something positive about the President. I do not think Alan needs tips from his former broadcast partner.
If anything, it is right wing blogs who need some tips on recognizing that opposing opinions do exist.
tayronachan May 10th, 2014 at 02:20
You have something positive to say about Pres Obama? Or Bush? Please post it. For me, Dems and Repubs and just different sides of the same coin. It took BOTH of them to saddle us with 17+ trillion in debt and a warfare/welfare state.
What is the definition of insanity?
Chinese Democracy May 12th, 2014 at 02:13
Liberals and conservatives are not the same and to think there is any parity is of course a sign of insanity
tayronachan May 12th, 2014 at 22:03
Again, It took BOTH of them to saddle us with 17+ trillion in debt, 40+ million on food stamps, our industrial base shipped overseas, and a warfare/welfare state. And they both print money ( QE ). I guess that is where the Dems and Repubs get money, because there are now more people in the wagon riding than there are pulling.
William May 12th, 2014 at 22:14
LOL, Suddenly conservatives are worried about “fiscal responsibility”.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 17:50
Since Ive been posting here Ive seen a thousand comments by t baggers and RWNJs that prove you wrong.
Many posters here thrive on rightie posts . Its a feeding frenzy
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:03
You are very welcome to your views however when you attempt to speak for others, you cross the line and you will get called out. My husband is a veteran and he would think you are a babbling moron.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:50
Of course he would, IF he were a veteran in the mold of John “Swiftboat” Kerry or Al “Climate changer” Gore. If he’s a normal combat vet, let’s say of my era (67-93), then he might just think otherwise. Ask him.
Does he remember his oath? Has he read the document he swore to protect from ALL its enemies? Was he a draftee? I know many of them also eventually took pride in their service, even though during the war they weren’t real happy. It’s entirely possible your husband and I might have more in common than you think.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:52
You have no idea how wrong you are. But I’ll just leave it at that.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:57
I’ve been mistaken before. You’re not getting a cherry boy here. However, as long as he’s not an incarnation of the late, unlamented John Murtha, I can respect the fact that he had the stones to put it all out there and serve.
dert connaly May 8th, 2014 at 21:20
Nobody cares what you clam your “husband” is. I think you’re liar and a bold faced hypocritical inferior leftist of the highest order.
What I just posted is as relevant as all the blathering pointless ANGRY posts you’ve planted here…………just say’n.
mea_mark May 8th, 2014 at 21:25
If you want to contribute to the discussion clean it up or be gone, comments like this are not welcome.
dert connaly May 8th, 2014 at 21:37
Really? I see BanditBasheet is a shining example of civility. Keep you’re purification on you coward. I’m gone.
tayronachan May 10th, 2014 at 02:14
I’m not a vet, but don’t think for a second David W. is alone in the way he thinks and feels. I live in small town USA, where most of the vets come from. And the vets I know are not liking the direction the country is going, and how invasive Washington has become in everyday life. 17+ trillion in debt (impossible to pay off), 40+ million on food stamps, real unemployment around 20% (using real, pre ’94 measurements), bailouts for criminals on Wall Street, all the scandals (not just Obama, but Bush too), all the spying, all the hypocrisy, all the foreign intervention, all the “free trade” that is supposed to make us all more prosperous but enriches only a few.
It’s been 80 years since the last big cirsis, and that was the Great Depression/WWII. What will this turning bring? Do TPTB have time to focus the people on an external threat, before they focus on them?
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 19:35
You realize nobody believes your redstate b/s right? Exhibit A: ”
A VETERANS%u2019 PETITION FOR REDRESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION author: D.C. Wright USMC Retired target: Congress, the Executive and the Judicial
signatures: 0! ->we’ve got 0 signatures, help us get to 100,000 by January 22, 2010″-teabagging Limbaugh kills braincells.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:54
Limbaugh isn’t on my list either. He’s a conceited windbag.
No, my FR post got no PUBLIC takers, but then I wasn’t expecting much there. Many FReepers are big government addicts, like the left. They only differ in what they want to outlaw, or they’d be right here with you.
MY kinda folks don’t advertise very much. We know who we are, because we’ve served together or know a friend of a friend. Public displays are not our big thing. I speak up because I can’t leave your folks thinking they have no real opposition to your dreams of total government.
Others are waiting silently…
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:56
You know, you take a lot for granted. You may be a vet, but you are not the ONLY vet out there … and you do not speak for anyone but yourself.
Go live in the shadows, but you are in for an extremely rude awakening. It is not wise to assume that the Veterans will support your little idiocy. You are out in wackadoodle land .. and you seem to know it.
All you apparently have is name calling.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:06
Of COURSE I’m not the only vet out there. But most of us do take our oaths seriously. And have bothered to READ the Constitution we swore to protect.
Nor do I EVER INITIATE name-calling. I have, however, learned to return fire when fired upon. And I did read the whole comment section, including YOURS before putting fingers to keyboard. As a “mod,’ you’re one of the WORST name-callers here. Why is THAT???
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:08
So now you imply that if a veteran disagrees with you, they are NOT taking their oath seriously?
You have some serious issues Mr. Wright … beyond just the usual arrogance people like you employ. Bullies never win – particularly on a blog like this.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:54
Limpballs does kill braincells. He already killed his with his oxycontin drug addiction. I can only assume that he also killed his Ball Cells.
He has no brains, no balls and a big mouth.
Mr. Wright believes he is the only veteran here. He does not speak for my family – and he needs to figure that out. It’s why he has “0” signatures,
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:52
“Constitutional Restorationist”?
Not that you have noticed, but WE are the people too. You are not the only person here with an opinion, however you do like to shoot off your mouth.
Your ideas/plans/thoughts are insane. That tells me you are insane. Therefore I think you need to be filed under Right Wing Troll.
If the image fits …
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 22:31
Exactly WHAT would be “insane” about cutting fedgov to its Constitutional size and restoring the freedoms ALL of us are guaranteed by it? The Founders fully intended for the Constitution to be a LIMIT ON GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY, not a limit on what We, the People, can rightly do.
Which, by the way, includes owning the arms of your choice or ingesting the herbs or whatever of your choice, residing where and with whom you care to, driving/flying the vehicle of your choice whereever your heart desires to go, whenever YOU decide.
NONE of these things are properly the business of ANY level of government, nor is what you do with property YOU own (respecting the fact that your whatevers ENDD at your property line). Your rights are unlimited, subject ONLY to respecting the equal rights of others.
I understand this might seem like crazy talk to some of you, but that’s what FREEDOM is all about. I have a sister who was (and still speaks up for others) a “sex worker” in L.A. I can’t say that I like that, but I fully respect her RIGHT to make her own choices, and I support her, as my sister. I also think that her former profession should be decriminalized soonest, so that those in it can have the protection of the law, instead of hiding from it. Is THAT “crazy talk” to you?
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:51
In a word?
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:50
Constitution restorationist? That’s a new one. But I’ll bet it’s the same old agenda including going back to being 3/5 of a man for African-Americans and of course women will go back to being the property of their fathers until they (of course!) get married, at which time they will become the property of their husbands. Voting will be restricted to white male christian (and only the RIGHT kind of christian) property owners…
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:39
I like your idea of progressive. Anyone to the left of Ghengis Kahn I guess.
Where in the constitution does it say that armed nutballs can confront the Gov because some welfare cowboy doesnt want to pay what he owes?
Is it the 14th amendment :)
The only thing u got right so far is that Im a big ole queen
William May 12th, 2014 at 22:40
“Hairy Reid owns over 90 acres in close proximity to Mr. Bundy’s ranch and wants a bigger parcel (Mr. Bundy’s land) to sell to Chinese interests”,
You of course have some sort of credible proof that you want to share with us right?
We’ll wait
W.G. Britting
USN retired
Ford Ranger Restorationist. (fixing those rusty quarter panels).
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:09
Since there seems to be pretty strong evidence (I would call it conclusive, but Ballless Hairy Reid’s a progressive liberal democrat) that Ballless Hairy Reid owns over 90 acres in close proximity to Mr. Bundy’s ranch and wants a bigger parcel (Mr. Bundy’s land) to sell to Chinese interests, that would indicate that Ballless Hairy Reid WOULD send violent men to wreak havoc on Mr. Bundy, absent the Oath Keepers and militia men and women currently stationed there.
And the evidence has been presented on numerous websites AND documented. Sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com has links to much of it. I know y’all are leftwing rant kings and queens, not much given to the Founders,civility, the Constitution (as the contract which We, the People, entered into with the Several States, which created Fedgov and granted it certain LAID-OUT and LIMITED powers to act on, as an agent of the States and the People), or even simple truths, but perhaps if I try to use small words, even YOU might understand what’s at stake here.
D.C. Wright
USMC Retired
Constitutional Restorationist
III/OK
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 19:19
you talk about not being given to civility and you use terms like “ballless” and make condescending statements about small words.
your post is a perfect paradigm of cognitive dissonance.
I will defend my beliefs and opinions in Constitutional terms anytime.
a blog is not an objective source of information. would you accept this blog as an irrefutable source of information? when your “proof” appears in the Wall St Journal, let me know.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:26
I only echo the tone I see in many other posters here and on other “tolerant” leftist sites. In that, I am a mirror of what I see, saving for foul language.
As to blogs, no, but the links and cites are on Sipsey Street, for anyone’s perusal. I also did listen to the entire audio of Alan’s conversation with Mike. So I take his comments with a LARGE grain of salt.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 19:30
at least at this site, opposing viewpoints are presented. try doing the same thing at a right wing site where you disagree with the views of the publisher, and see how quickly your account is terminated. you likely will not need a calendar to measure the interval. a stopwatch will probably be sufficient.
so before you go putting tolerant in quotation marks, why not take a look at your own side of the political aisle and see what intolerance really looks like, no quotation marks necessary
http://www.redstate.com/posting-rules/
13. The dissemination of talking points from the Democrat Party, or its politicians and allies, is not allowed
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:35
Redstate is not on my list to visit, never has been. As to tolerance, look at DU and most of the other leftie sites. This is a model of what COULD be, in comparison. Of course when you and your choir use terms like RWNJ and similar derogatory terms, expect that I, at least, will fire back kind for kind. Ya gotta give to get. Cool?
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 19:42
I am not a member of any choir. My point is that regardless of what sites you frequent, I see no reason why this or any other leftist site needs to adhere to a standard that is not only absent from right wing sites, but in some cases written into the rules.
Personally, I give the level of respect that I receive. Having said that, after 5 years of noise about forged birth certificates, secret Muslims, death panels, socialism, child re-education camps and so-called strict constructionists advocating denial of article 6 and first amendment rights to Muslims, I fail to see how anyone who holds those views is not deserving of the label RWNJ.
I respect you and your beliefs to the same extent you respect me and my beliefs.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:59
Your beliefs are what they are. When you try to grow government to IMPLEMENT them, we’ll have some serious issues. MY beliefs treat Americans as grownups and SHRINK government to its Constitutional limits, leaving you to live your beliefs without impacting others who are not so minded.
Stop trying to get government involved in every aspect of other folks’ lives and we’ll have NO problems, OK?
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:06
Really? You apparently are trying to tell us how to live and what to believe – based upon??? You say you speak for veterans? I call bullsh*t. You do not have the ability to speak for veterans – they can very well speak for themselves. And they do.
“Stop trying to get government involved in every aspect of other folks’ lives and we’ll have NO problems, OK?”
Careful now … that sounds a bit threatening doesn’t it? Kind of like “shut up or I’ll shut you up”? Is your mouth writing checks your body can’t cash?
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:13
Oh, perish forbid that I would EVER tell you and yours what to believe. It’s only when you try to force YOUR beliefs on others THROUGH GOVERNMENT that we have “issues.” Your right to believe is guaranteed (but not GRANTED) by the First Amendment. You possess it by reason of being human.
I would never even WANT to shut you up. I might ridicule you, but that’s OK. You see, I have renounced the INITIATION of force and would give you the first shot. BUT I WILL shoot back. Guaranteed.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:22
Mr. Wright how am I forcing my views onto you? You have free choice to visit or not visit blogs that disagree with you. That is your right.
I would never tell you to shut up either.
It is important that people see what you think and how you feel, in order to form an opinion of you. We can only judge you based upon how you present yourself.
I have already proven you are wrong about Calvin Coolidge based upon your post below. Accuracy is important – and when you are seriously incorrect with facts, it doesn’t drive your point home. A simple Google would have told you the accurate dates for the Coolidge Presidency and the Fall of Wall Street. As it was, you made a big point that was completely wrong.
I can call you out when you are wrong with facts which you just were.
And I can and will call you out when you attempt to link your views with veterans in general. You really do not have a right to speak for others.
You apparently seem to mention “the use of force” and “shooting” … and shooting back. Mr. Wright … you need to be very careful … not all of us are gun nuts.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:26
Read my response below before congratulating yourself.
tayronachan May 10th, 2014 at 02:24
DW, check out theburningplatform blog by James Quinn, The Fourth Turning.
William May 12th, 2014 at 22:20
“When you try to grow government to IMPLEMENT “…
Bad news cupcake. The last republican president increased the government payroll by over 3/4 of a million employees. This president has shrunk the government parole by 2/3 of a million. Time to get new Limbaugh bumper sticker eh?
Shades May 8th, 2014 at 19:55
Here’s an idea DW. Why don’t you start your own blog and set your own rules, instead of telling other people to do it your way? If you don’t like it here, don’t let the door hit ya …
Chinese Democracy May 10th, 2014 at 02:46
I want to go to there
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:57
So far all you have is “I don’t go there” …
In other words, no one else listens to you either?
dert connaly May 8th, 2014 at 21:29
I guess this blog can’t handle free speech unless I’m a leftist attacking a conservative. Prove me wrong A.C. and put the comment back.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 21:36
I provided a link to redstate’s posting rules so I do not see what else there is to verify. the words “not allowed” are pretty darn clear. If you want to see an example of “vicious” posts, go over to redstate, create an account and in the most civil, intelligent manner you can muster, say something positive about the President. I do not think Alan needs tips from his former broadcast partner.
If anything, it is right wing blogs who need some tips on recognizing that opposing opinions do exist.
tayronachan May 10th, 2014 at 02:20
You have something positive to say about Pres Obama? Or Bush? Please post it. For me, Dems and Repubs and just different sides of the same coin. It took BOTH of them to saddle us with 17+ trillion in debt and a warfare/welfare state.
What is the definition of insanity?
Chinese Democracy May 12th, 2014 at 02:13
Liberals and conservatives are not the same and to think there is any parity is of course a sign of insanity
tayronachan May 12th, 2014 at 22:03
Again, It took BOTH of them to saddle us with 17+ trillion in debt, 40+ million on food stamps, our industrial base shipped overseas, and a warfare/welfare state. And they both print money ( QE ). I guess that is where the Dems and Repubs get money, because there are now more people in the wagon riding than there are pulling.
William May 12th, 2014 at 22:14
LOL, Suddenly conservatives are worried about “fiscal responsibility”.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 17:50
Since Ive been posting here Ive seen a thousand comments by t baggers and RWNJs that prove you wrong.
Many posters here thrive on rightie posts . Its a feeding frenzy
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:03
You are very welcome to your views however when you attempt to speak for others, you cross the line and you will get called out. My husband is a veteran and he would think you are a babbling moron.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:50
Of course he would, IF he were a veteran in the mold of John “Swiftboat” Kerry or Al “Climate changer” Gore. If he’s a normal combat vet, let’s say of my era (67-93), then he might just think otherwise. Ask him.
Does he remember his oath? Has he read the document he swore to protect from ALL its enemies? Was he a draftee? I know many of them also eventually took pride in their service, even though during the war they weren’t real happy. It’s entirely possible your husband and I might have more in common than you think.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:52
You have no idea how wrong you are. But I’ll just leave it at that.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:57
I’ve been mistaken before. You’re not getting a cherry boy here. However, as long as he’s not an incarnation of the late, unlamented John Murtha, I can respect the fact that he had the stones to put it all out there and serve.
mea_mark May 8th, 2014 at 21:25
If you want to contribute to the discussion clean it up or be gone, comments like this are not welcome.
dert connaly May 8th, 2014 at 21:37
Really? I see BanditBasheet is a shining example of civility. Keep you’re purification on you coward. I’m gone.
tayronachan May 10th, 2014 at 02:14
I’m not a vet, but don’t think for a second David W. is alone in the way he thinks and feels. I live in small town USA, where most of the vets come from. And the vets I know are not liking the direction the country is going, and how invasive Washington has become in everyday life. 17+ trillion in debt (impossible to pay off), 40+ million on food stamps, real unemployment around 20% (using real, pre ’94 measurements), bailouts for criminals on Wall Street, all the scandals (not just Obama, but Bush too), all the spying, all the hypocrisy, all the foreign intervention, all the “free trade” that is supposed to make us all more prosperous but enriches only a few.
It’s been 80 years since the last big cirsis, and that was the Great Depression/WWII. What will this turning bring? Do TPTB have time to focus the people on an external threat, before they focus on them?
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 19:35
You realize nobody believes your “Free Republic” b/s right? Exhibit A: “A VETERANS PETITION FOR REDRESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION author: D.C. Wright USMC Retired target: Congress, the Executive and the Judicial
Signatures: 0! ->we’ve got 0 signatures, help us get to 100,000 by January 22, 2010”-Teabagging Limbaugh kills braincells. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:dcwusmc/index?tab=articles
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:54
Limbaugh isn’t on my list either. He’s a conceited windbag.
No, my FR post got no PUBLIC takers, but then I wasn’t expecting much there. Many FReepers are big government addicts, like the left. They only differ in what they want to outlaw, or they’d be right here with you.
MY kinda folks don’t advertise very much. We know who we are, because we’ve served together or know a friend of a friend. Public displays are not our big thing. I speak up because I can’t leave your folks thinking they have no real opposition to your dreams of total government.
Others are waiting silently…
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:56
You know, you take a lot for granted. You may be a vet, but you are not the ONLY vet out there … and you do not speak for anyone but yourself.
Go live in the shadows, but you are in for an extremely rude awakening. It is not wise to assume that the Veterans will support your little idiocy. You are out in wackadoodle land .. and you seem to know it.
All you apparently have is name calling.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:06
Of COURSE I’m not the only vet out there. But most of us do take our oaths seriously. And have bothered to READ the Constitution we swore to protect.
Nor do I EVER INITIATE name-calling. I have, however, learned to return fire when fired upon. And I did read the whole comment section, including YOURS before putting fingers to keyboard. As a “mod,’ you’re one of the WORST name-callers here. Why is THAT???
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:08
So now you imply that if a veteran disagrees with you, they are NOT taking their oath seriously?
You have some serious issues Mr. Wright … beyond just the usual arrogance people like you employ. Bullies never win – particularly on a blog like this.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:54
Limpballs does kill braincells. He already killed his with his oxycontin drug addiction. I can only assume that he also killed his Ball Cells.
He has no brains, no balls and a big mouth.
Mr. Wright believes he is the only veteran here. He does not speak for my family – and he needs to figure that out. It’s why he has “0” signatures,
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 19:52
“Constitutional Restorationist”?
Not that you have noticed, but WE are the people too. You are not the only person here with an opinion, however you do like to shoot off your mouth.
Your ideas/plans/thoughts are insane. That tells me you are insane. Therefore I think you need to be filed under Right Wing Troll.
If the image fits …
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 22:31
Exactly WHAT would be “insane” about cutting fedgov to its Constitutional size and restoring the freedoms ALL of us are guaranteed by it? The Founders fully intended for the Constitution to be a LIMIT ON GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY, not a limit on what We, the People, can rightly do.
Which, by the way, includes owning the arms of your choice or ingesting the herbs or whatever of your choice, residing where and with whom you care to, driving/flying the vehicle of your choice whereever your heart desires to go, whenever YOU decide.
NONE of these things are properly the business of ANY level of government, nor is what you do with property YOU own (respecting the fact that your whatevers ENDD at your property line). Your rights are unlimited, subject ONLY to respecting the equal rights of others.
I understand this might seem like crazy talk to some of you, but that’s what FREEDOM is all about. I have a sister who was (and still speaks up for others) a “sex worker” in L.A. I can’t say that I like that, but I fully respect her RIGHT to make her own choices, and I support her, as my sister. I also think that her former profession should be decriminalized soonest, so that those in it can have the protection of the law, instead of hiding from it. Is THAT “crazy talk” to you?
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:51
In a word?
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:50
Constitution restorationist? That’s a new one. But I’ll bet it’s the same old agenda including going back to being 3/5 of a man for African-Americans and of course women will go back to being the property of their fathers until they (of course!) get married, at which time they will become the property of their husbands. Voting will be restricted to white male christian (and only the RIGHT kind of christian) property owners…
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:39
I like your idea of progressive. Anyone to the left of Ghengis Kahn I guess.
Where in the constitution does it say that armed nutballs can confront the Gov because some welfare cowboy doesnt want to pay what he owes?
Is it the 14th amendment :)
The only thing u got right so far is that Im a big ole queen
William May 12th, 2014 at 22:40
“Hairy Reid owns over 90 acres in close proximity to Mr. Bundy’s ranch and wants a bigger parcel (Mr. Bundy’s land) to sell to Chinese interests”,
You of course have some sort of credible proof that you want to share with us right?
We’ll wait
W.G. Britting
USN retired
Ford Ranger Restorationist. (fixing those rusty quarter panels).
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 19:29
Mike Vanderboegh is far more likely to be teabagging 25 years to life for baseless threats having no evidence whatsoever. Leader Reid’s annual financial statements accurately debunk the dittoshitheads.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:38
And you know this because…???
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 19:52
“because…???” i’m not an idiot and I preemptively READ my news instead of believing always errant Fantasy Noise Casters e.g. 1) http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/foxs-pirro-pushes-debunked-conspiracy-reid 2) http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/14/spurious-cattle-conspiracy-dodges-facts-but-sti/198880 Strike 3) http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/nevada.asp FALSE
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:01
I think all of us are going to be getting into cartoons more and more to emphasize our point of view. I find it fascinating that RWNJ’s love to fly in and spam their small brains out and then huff away offended when they are called out. Knowing where to take your story is a matter of intelligence. If he doesn’t like the sandbox, he is welcome to return to the pond scum that he apparently idolizes. I am sure his Wingers will love his point of view.
The concept that HE speaks for veterans is disgusting – which is why he has ZERO signatures for his dream petition.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:41
Au contraire, Mr. Mod. I am NOT “slinking” anywhere. I am in this for the long haul. But thanks for thinking of me. ‘Preciate it.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:50
In the interest of accuracy, the word “slinking” is yours.
We don’t agree. We will not agree. I just question why you come here hating everything we believe in, trying to change us when it isn’t going to work? There really isn’t any point in arguing.
Shades May 9th, 2014 at 07:58
He’s just another lonely soul with no friends whose only personal interactions come from trolling liberals. No one else will pay attention to him.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:36
on a 1998 e machine
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 21:06
Mr. Wright what LL ID did you previously post with? Are you an Oklahoman and/or a truck driver?
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 21:42
None of the above. Drove THROUGH Oklahoma back in ’72, but in my POV, not a truck. This is my first time coming here.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:33
LOL or wayout?
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:33
you are only in it for as long as they want. This isnt a Democracy this is a modocracy. And please dont slink away. But try to do more research u are way to easy to best
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 22:09
I just went back and looked up that petition. There is NO WAY you can possibly state that there are no signers on it, since it has been CLOSED by The Petition Site and is no longer available. I don’t recall, now, how many veteran signers there were, but I KNOW it was a number quite a bit higher than zero. The FR post showed dozens who said they had.
Were you folks lying or just taking advantage of its goneness?
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:34
Do you how know Far Bundy’s 1/2 Sq Mile Ranch is from Laughlin, NV? You know welfare rancher Bundy’s teeny-tiny mini-ranch that his family first bought in 1948? -And y’all know cattle would ROAST in Laughlin right? Because it’s frequently the hottest place in the USA!
-Oh, and the Chinese project was canceled in 2013 anyway. But the fact that the associated web pages were taken are just “proof” that it’s a conspiracy man. Via C & L Linking Embedded Link http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/17/facts-disprove-conspiracy-theory-about-sen-harry-r/
PS Google David Wright,etc & see for yourself “0 Signers”:)
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:43
Just as an aside, yesterday I followed a link and ended up at one of those places. I had to take a shower after! The right wing echo machine is incredible.
Dana King May 8th, 2014 at 21:33
LOL, so you post links to crap to validate your premise? Media matter? Really? Might as well say aliens live in your closet and assert anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot. Media matters and snopes is properly vetting your sources? HAHA!!! What a maroon!
mea_mark May 8th, 2014 at 21:36
It is around here. If you don’t like it, you can leave anytime you want.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 21:37
please post a single example where MediaMatters was wrong on the facts.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:31
/starts the Jeopardy music waiting… druming fingers still waiting… AND still waiting
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:11
Did you READ Snopes? Crooks & Liars? And as arc99 says “please post a single example where MediaMatters was wrong on the facts.”
Ms. King is obviously allergic to honesty as verified by factbased reality:-ALL ABOOOOOAAAARRD HAHAHAHAHAHA… AY AY AY AY AY… Crazy! But that’s how most on FNC ‘blows… http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x11e2y_ozzy-osbourne-crazy-train_music
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:30
LOL just because you dont agree with Media Matters doesnt mean they are crap. They always PROVE what they post usually with VIDEO. So sad to bad . Try reality sometime it can be fun!
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 21:50
So you read all the left wing stuff that suits YOUR viewpoint. Much of what’s there has been debunked by actual facts, but I won’t burst your balloon by pointing that out to you. I do hate seeing folks cry when they learn there is no Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:39
Do you how know Far Bundy’s 1/2 Sq Mile Ranch is from Laughlin, NV? (3 Hours!) You know welfare rancher Bundy’s teeny-tiny mini-ranch that his family first bought in 1948? -And y’all know cattle would ROAST in Laughlin right? Because it’s frequently the hottest place in the USA!
-Oh, and the Chinese project was canceled in 2013 anyway. But the fact that the associated web pages were taken are just “proof” that it’s a conspiracy man. Via C & L Linking Embedded Link http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/17/facts-disprove-conspiracy-theory-about-sen-harry-r/
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:02
Because like most boisterous big mouths, they get 15 minutes of fame and then the bottom drops out.
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 19:29
Mike Vanderboegh is far more likely to be teabagging 25 years to life for baseless threats having no evidence whatsoever. Leader Reid’s annual financial statements accurately debunk the dittoshitheads.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 19:38
And you know this because…???
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 19:52
“because…???” i’m not an idiot and I preemptively READ my news instead of believing always errant Fantasy Noise Casters e.g. 1) http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/foxs-pirro-pushes-debunked-conspiracy-reid 2) http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/14/spurious-cattle-conspiracy-dodges-facts-but-sti/198880 Strike 3) http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/nevada.asp FALSE
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:01
I think all of us are going to be getting into cartoons more and more to emphasize our point of view. I find it fascinating that RWNJ’s love to fly in and spam their small brains out and then huff away offended when they are called out. Knowing where to take your story is a matter of intelligence. If he doesn’t like the sandbox, he is welcome to return to the pond scum that he apparently idolizes. I am sure his Wingers will love his point of view.
The concept that HE speaks for veterans is disgusting – which is why he has ZERO signatures for his dream petition.
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 20:41
Au contraire, Mr. Mod. I am NOT “slinking” anywhere. I am in this for the long haul. But thanks for thinking of me. ‘Preciate it.
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:50
In the interest of accuracy, the word “slinking” is yours.
We don’t agree. We will not agree. I just question why you come here hating everything we believe in, trying to change us when it isn’t going to work? There really isn’t any point in arguing.
Shades May 9th, 2014 at 07:58
He’s just another lonely soul with no friends whose only personal interactions come from trolling liberals. No one else will pay attention to him.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:36
on a 1998 e machine
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 21:06
Mr. Wright what LL ID did you previously post with? Are you an Oklahoman and/or a truck driver?
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 21:42
None of the above. Drove THROUGH Oklahoma back in ’72, but in my POV, not a truck. This is my first time coming here.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:33
LOL or wayout?
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:33
you are only in it for as long as they want. This isnt a Democracy this is a modocracy. And please dont slink away. But try to do more research u are way to easy to best
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 22:09
I just went back and looked up that petition. There is NO WAY you can possibly state that there are no signers on it, since it has been CLOSED by The Petition Site and is no longer available. I don’t recall, now, how many veteran signers there were, but I KNOW it was a number quite a bit higher than zero. The FR post showed dozens who said they had.
Were you folks lying or just taking advantage of its goneness?
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:34
Google David Wright,etc & see for yourself “0 Signers”:)
M D Reese May 8th, 2014 at 23:43
Just as an aside, yesterday I followed a link and ended up at one of those places. I had to take a shower after! The right wing echo machine is incredible.
Dana King May 8th, 2014 at 21:33
LOL, so you post links to crap to validate your premise? Media matter? Really? Might as well say aliens live in your closet and assert anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot. Media matters and snopes is properly vetting your sources? HAHA!!! What a maroon!
mea_mark May 8th, 2014 at 21:36
It is around here. If you don’t like it, you can leave anytime you want.
arc99 May 8th, 2014 at 21:37
please post a single example where MediaMatters was wrong on the facts.
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:31
/starts the Jeopardy music waiting… druming fingers still waiting… AND still waiting
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:11
Did you READ Snopes? Crooks & Liars? And as arc99 says “please post a single example where MediaMatters was wrong on the facts.”
Ms. King is obviously allergic to honesty as verified by factbased reality:-ALL ABOOOOOAAAARRD HAHAHAHAHAHA… AY AY AY AY AY… Crazy! But that’s how most Cons travel on their FNC fueled Crazy Train! http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x11e2y_ozzy-osbourne-crazy-train_music
Chinese Democracy May 9th, 2014 at 16:30
LOL just because you dont agree with Media Matters doesnt mean they are crap. They always PROVE what they post usually with VIDEO. So sad to bad . Try reality sometime it can be fun!
David Wright May 8th, 2014 at 21:50
So you read all the left wing stuff that suits YOUR viewpoint. Much of what’s there has been debunked by actual facts, but I won’t burst your balloon by pointing that out to you. I do hate seeing folks cry when they learn there is no Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.
Obewon May 8th, 2014 at 22:39
Do you know how Far Bundy’s 1/2 Sq Mile Ranch is from Laughlin, NV? (3 Hours!) You know welfare rancher Bundy’s teeny-tiny mini-ranch that his family first bought in 1948? -And y’all know cattle would ROAST in Laughlin right? Because it’s frequently the hottest place in the USA!
-Oh, and the Chinese project was canceled in 2013 anyway. But the fact that the associated web pages were taken are just “proof” that it’s a conspiracy man. Via C & L Linking Embedded Link http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/17/facts-disprove-conspiracy-theory-about-sen-harry-r/
BanditBasheert May 8th, 2014 at 20:02
Because like most boisterous big mouths, they get 15 minutes of fame and then the bottom drops out.